Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017;8(3):223-227.
doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2017.03.010.

Validation of different pediatric triage systems in the emergency department

Kanokwan Aeimchanbanjong  1 , Uthen Pandee  1
Affiliations

Validation of different pediatric triage systems in the emergency department

Kanokwan Aeimchanbanjong et al. World J Emerg Med. 2017.

Abstract

Background: Triage system in children seems to be more challenging compared to adults because of their different response to physiological and psychosocial stressors. This study aimed to determine the best triage system in the pediatric emergency department.

Methods: This was a prospective observational study. This study was divided into two phases. The first phase determined the inter-rater reliability of five triage systems: Manchester Triage System (MTS), Emergency Severity Index (ESI) version 4, Pediatric Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS), Australasian Triage Scale (ATS), and Ramathibodi Triage System (RTS) by triage nurses and pediatric residents. In the second phase, to analyze the validity of each triage system, patients were categorized as two groups, i.e., high acuity patients (triage level 1, 2) and low acuity patients (triage level 3, 4, and 5). Then we compared the triage acuity with actual admission.

Results: In phase I, RTS illustrated almost perfect inter-rater reliability with kappa of 1.0 (P<0.01). ESI and CTAS illustrated good inter-rater reliability with kappa of 0.8-0.9 (P<0.01). Meanwhile, ATS and MTS illustrated moderate to good inter-rater reliability with kappa of 0.5-0.7 (P<0.01). In phase II, we included 1 041 participants with average age of 4.7±4.2 years, of which 55% were male and 45% were female. In addition 32% of the participants had underlying diseases, and 123 (11.8%) patients were admitted. We found that ESI illustrated the most appropriate predicting ability for admission with sensitivity of 52%, specificity of 81%, and AUC 0.78 (95%CI 0.74-0.81).

Conclusion: RTS illustrated almost perfect inter-rater reliability. Meanwhile, ESI and CTAS illustrated good inter-rater reliability. Finally, ESI illustrated the appropriate validity for triage system.

Keywords: Emergency department; Pediatric; Triage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest: The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest related to the publication of this paper.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
ROC curves of five triage systems.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Morris ZS, Boyle A, Beniuk K, Robinson S. Emergency department crowding:towards an agenda for evidence-based intervention. Emerg Med J. 2012;29(6):460–6. - PubMed
    1. Cain P, Waldrop RD, Jones J. Improved pediatric patient flow in a general emergency department by altering triage criteria. Acad Emerg Med. 1996;3(1):65–71. - PubMed
    1. Fernandes CMB, Tanabe P, Gilboy N, Johnson LA, McNair RS, Rosenau AM, et al. Five-level triage:a report from the ACEP/ENA five-level triage task force. J Emerg Nurs. 2005;31(1):39–50. - PubMed
    1. Christ M, Grossmann F, Winter D, Bingisser R, Platz E. Modern triage in the emergency department. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2010;107(50):892–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. van Veen M, Moll HA. Reliability and validity of triage systems in paediatric emergency care. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2009;17:38. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources