Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Aug;54(4):1277-1304.
doi: 10.1007/s13524-017-0587-x.

Influence of Proximity to Kin on Residential Mobility and Destination Choice: Examining Local Movers in Metropolitan Areas

Affiliations

Influence of Proximity to Kin on Residential Mobility and Destination Choice: Examining Local Movers in Metropolitan Areas

Amy Spring et al. Demography. 2017 Aug.

Abstract

A growing body of research has examined how family dynamics shape residential mobility, highlighting the social-as opposed to economic-drivers of mobility. However, few studies have examined kin ties as both push and pull factors in mobility processes or revealed how the influence of kin ties on mobility varies across sociodemographic groups. Using data on local residential moves from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID) from 1980 to 2013, we find that location of noncoresident kin influences the likelihood of moving out of the current neighborhood and the selection of a new destination neighborhood. Analyses of out-mobility reveal that parents and young adult children living near each other as well as low-income adult children living near parents are especially deterred from moving. Discrete-choice models of neighborhood selection indicate that movers are particularly drawn to neighborhoods close to aging parents, white and higher-income households tend to move close to parents and children, and lower-income households tend to move close to extended family. Our results highlight the social and economic trade-offs that households face when making residential mobility decisions, which have important implications for broader patterns of inequality in residential attainment.

Keywords: Discrete choice; Family dynamics; Neighborhood; Residential mobility.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Odds of out-mobility by age, income, and proximity to kin. Graphs for age are based on coefficients from Table 4, Model 3. Depicted odds are in reference to a baseline of 18 years and no kin of that type within 1 mile. Graphs for family income are based on coefficients from Table 4, Model 5. Depicted odds are in reference to a baseline of zero income and no kin of that type within 1 mile. Family income is standardized to year 2000 dollars
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Odds of destination tract choice among movers by age, income, and proximity to kin. Graphs for age are based on coefficients from Table 6, Model 3. Depicted odds are in reference to a baseline of 18 years and no kin of that type within 1 mile. Graphs for family income are based on coefficients from Table 6, Model 6. Depicted odds are in reference to a baseline of zero income and no kin of that type within 1 mile. Family income is standardized to year 2000 dollars

References

    1. Alba RD, Logan JR. Analyzing locational attainments: constructing individual-level regression models using aggregate data. Social Methods Research. 1992;20:367–397.
    1. Alba RD, Logan JR. Minority proximity to whites in suburbs: An individual-level analysis of segregation. American Journal of Sociology. 1993;98:1388–1427.
    1. Allen WR. Class, culture, and family organization: The effects of class and race on family structure in urban America. Journal of Comparative Family Studies. 1979;10:301–313.
    1. American Housing Survey. Public use file (version 1.1) Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development; 2011.
    1. Bach RL, Smith J. Community satisfaction, expectations of moving, and migration. Demography. 1977;14:147–167. - PubMed