Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Oct;44(10):5010-5019.
doi: 10.1002/mp.12455. Epub 2017 Aug 12.

Multistage stereotactic radiosurgery for large cerebral arteriovenous malformations using the Gamma Knife platform

Affiliations

Multistage stereotactic radiosurgery for large cerebral arteriovenous malformations using the Gamma Knife platform

Chuxiong Ding et al. Med Phys. 2017 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: Radiosurgery is an established technique to treat cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). Obliteration of larger AVMs (> 10-15 cm3 or diameter > 3 cm) in a single session is challenging with current radiosurgery platforms due to toxicity. We present a novel technique of multistage stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for large intracranial arteriovenous malformations (AVM) using the Gamma Knife system.

Materials/methods: Eighteen patients with large (> 10-15 cm3 or diameter > 3 cm) AVMs, which were previously treated using a staged SRS technique on the Cyberknife platform, were retrospectively selected for this study. The AVMs were contoured and divided into 3-8 subtargets to be treated sequentially in a staged approach at half to 4 week intervals. The prescription dose ranged from 15 Gy to 20 Gy, depending on the subtarget number, volume, and location. Gamma Knife plans using multiple collimator settings were generated and optimized. The coordinates of each shot from the initial plan covering the total AVM target were extracted based on their relative positions within the frame system. The shots were regrouped based on their location with respect to the subtarget contours to generate subplans for each stage. The delivery time of each shot for a subtarget was decay corrected with 60 Co for staging the treatment course to generate the same dose distribution as that planned for the total AVM target. Conformality indices and dose-volume analysis were performed to evaluate treatment plans.

Results: With the shot redistribution technique, the composite dose for the multistaged treatment of multiple subtargets is equivalent to the initial plan for total AVM target. Gamma Knife plans resulted in an average PTV coverage of 96.3 ± 0.9% and a PITV of 1.23 ± 0.1. The resulting Conformality indices, V12Gy and R50 dose spillage values were 0.76 ± 0.05, 3.4 ± 1.8, and 3.1 ± 0.5 respectively.

Conclusion: The Gamma Knife system can deliver a multistaged conformal dose to treat large AVMs when correcting for translational setup errors of each shot at each staged treatment.

Keywords: Gamma Knife; arteriovenous malformation; stereotactic radiosurgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Multistage SRS of large AVM using Gamma Knife. (a) Shots are divided among two stages depending on the center location of each shot. (b) Example dose distribution for each staged treatment of individual sub‐targets.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Simulation of Gamma Knife treatment by combining an image of the Gamma Knife frame and an MRI image for a Cyberknife treatment. (a) Gamma Knife frame MRI image. (b) Patient MRI image. (c) Combined Gamma Knife frame and patient MRI images.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Shots repositioned to compensate for translational setup errors. (a) Original plan for entire AVM target. (b) Setup error after repositioning the patient in the next staged treatment. Shots are repositioned to compensate for translational setup errors depending on the image registration.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Phantom study of the ICON system. (a) Irradiation with the ICON frameless system. (b) Anthropomorphic phantom with film. (c) Irradiation for entire AVM target to be used as the reference dose distribution. (d) First stage irradiation (e) Cumulative dose distribution from the first and second stages with random setup errors. (f) Cumulative dose distribution from all stages with random setup errors.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Residual rotational errors after compensation of translational setup errors depending on a rotation angle of ±1°, ±3°, and ±5° in (a), (b), and (c) respectively. [Color figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

References

    1. Lunsford LD, Niranjan A, Kondziolka D, Sirin S, Flickinger JC. Arteriovenous malformation radiosurgery: a twenty year perspective. Clin Neurosurg. 2008;55:108–119. - PubMed
    1. Flickinger JC, Kondziolka D, Maitz AH, Lunsford LD. An analysis of the dose‐response for arteriovenous malformation radiosurgery and other factors affecting obliteration. Radiother Oncol. 2002;63:347–354. - PubMed
    1. Friedman WA, Bova FJ. Radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations. Neurol Res. 2011;33:803–819. - PubMed
    1. Kano H, Kondziolka D, Flickinger JC, et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations, part 6: multistaged volumetric management of large arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg. 2012;116:54–65. - PubMed
    1. Zabel A, Milker‐Zabel S, Huber P, Schulz‐Ertner D, Schlegel W, Debus J. Treatment outcome after linac‐based radiosurgery in cerebral arteriovenous malformations: retrospective analysis of factors affecting obliteration. Radiother Oncol. 2005;77:105–110. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources