Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Dec;88(6):581-586.
doi: 10.1080/17453674.2017.1344459. Epub 2017 Jul 6.

Artificial intelligence for analyzing orthopedic trauma radiographs

Affiliations

Artificial intelligence for analyzing orthopedic trauma radiographs

Jakub Olczak et al. Acta Orthop. 2017 Dec.

Abstract

Background and purpose - Recent advances in artificial intelligence (deep learning) have shown remarkable performance in classifying non-medical images, and the technology is believed to be the next technological revolution. So far it has never been applied in an orthopedic setting, and in this study we sought to determine the feasibility of using deep learning for skeletal radiographs. Methods - We extracted 256,000 wrist, hand, and ankle radiographs from Danderyd's Hospital and identified 4 classes: fracture, laterality, body part, and exam view. We then selected 5 openly available deep learning networks that were adapted for these images. The most accurate network was benchmarked against a gold standard for fractures. We furthermore compared the network's performance with 2 senior orthopedic surgeons who reviewed images at the same resolution as the network. Results - All networks exhibited an accuracy of at least 90% when identifying laterality, body part, and exam view. The final accuracy for fractures was estimated at 83% for the best performing network. The network performed similarly to senior orthopedic surgeons when presented with images at the same resolution as the network. The 2 reviewer Cohen's kappa under these conditions was 0.76. Interpretation - This study supports the use for orthopedic radiographs of artificial intelligence, which can perform at a human level. While current implementation lacks important features that surgeons require, e.g. risk of dislocation, classifications, measurements, and combining multiple exam views, these problems have technical solutions that are waiting to be implemented for orthopedics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
2 images from the dataset. The area within the red box is the section presented to the network in order to classify the image. The left image is of a wrist fracture while the right image is without any apparent fracture.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Performance of the 5 networks. An epoch is 1 pass over all images.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Andersen D J, Blair W F, Stevers C M, Adams B D, El-Khouri G Y, Brandser E A.. Classification of distal radius fractures: An analysis of interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility. J Hand Surg. 1996; 21 (4): 574–82. - PubMed
    1. Audigé L, Bhandari M, Hanson B, Kellam J.. A concept for the validation of fracture classifications. J Orthop Trauma. 2005; 19 (6): 404–9. - PubMed
    1. Automation and anxiety. The Economist [Internet]. 2016 Jun 25 [cited 2016 Nov 22]; Available from: http://www.economist.com/news/special-report/21700758-will-smarter-machi....
    1. Bar Y, Diamant I, Wolf L, Greenspan H. Deep learning with non-medical training used for chest pathology identification. 2015. [cited 2016 Jun 2]. p. 94140V–94140V–7. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.2083124 - DOI
    1. Beck A H, Sangoi A R, Leung S, Marinelli R J, Nielsen T O, van de Vijver M J, West R B, van de Rijn M, Koller D.. Systematic analysis of breast cancer morphology uncovers stromal features associated with survival. Sci Transl Med 2011; 3 (108): 108ra113–108ra113. - PubMed