Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2017 Jul 6;7(1):4817.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-04976-z.

Interspecific comparison of allometry between body weight and chest girth in domestic bovids

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Interspecific comparison of allometry between body weight and chest girth in domestic bovids

Hiroki Anzai et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

The sizes of body parts often co-vary through exponential scaling, known as allometry. The evolution of allometry is central to the generation of morphological diversity. To make inferences regarding the evolved responses in allometry to natural and artificial selection, we compared allometric parameters (slope and intercept) among seven species and breeds of domestic bovids using cross-sectional ontogenetic data and attempted to interpret the differences in these parameters. The allometric slopes were not different among some species, whereas those between breeds within species were, indicating that the slopes were typically invariant but could be changed under strong, specific selection. With the exception of yak, the differences in the intercept independent of the slopes (the alternative intercept) among species might better correspond to their divergence times than the differences in allometric slope, and the remarkably higher alternative intercept found in yaks can be explained by their unique morphological evolution. These findings provide evidence that differences in the alternative intercept can retain traces of the phylogenetic changes derived from differentiation and evolution.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Conceptual description of the allometric intercept independent of the slope (the alternative intercept, log(a’)).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Estimated allometry with scatter plots of observations by species and breed. (A) Allometric lines on logarithmic scale. (B) Allometric curves on arithmetic scale.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Scatter plots of allometric parameters across species and breeds. (A) Slopes (b) and intercepts (log(a)). (B) Slopes and alternative intercepts (log(a’)).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Relationships between allometric parameters and species divergence time. (A) Slopes (b) and divergence time. (B) Alternative intercepts (log(a’)) and divergence time. For buffalo and zebu, the mean values of the two breeds of each species are shown. The numbers under the branch points indicate divergence times (millions of years ago), which were derived from analyses of molecular phylogeny, .

References

    1. Huxley JS. Constant differential growth-ratios and their significance. Nature. 1924;114:895–896. doi: 10.1038/114895a0. - DOI
    1. Huxley, J. S. Problems of relative growth. (Methuen, 1932).
    1. White JF, Gould SJ. Interpretation of the coefficient in the allometric equation. Am. Nat. 1965;99:5–18. doi: 10.1086/282344. - DOI
    1. Halley AC. Prenatal Brain-Body Allometry in Mammals. Brain Behav. Evol. 2016;88:14–24. doi: 10.1159/000447254. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McMahon T. Size and shape in biology. Science. 1973;179:1201–1204. doi: 10.1126/science.179.4079.1201. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types