Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2017 Jul 7;7(7):CD006396.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006396.pub4.

Interventions to prevent occupational noise-induced hearing loss

Christina Tikka  1 , Jos H Verbeek, Erik Kateman, Thais C Morata, Wouter A Dreschler, Silvia Ferrite
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Interventions to prevent occupational noise-induced hearing loss

Christina Tikka et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: This is the second update of a Cochrane Review originally published in 2009. Millions of workers worldwide are exposed to noise levels that increase their risk of hearing disorders. There is uncertainty about the effectiveness of hearing loss prevention interventions.

Objectives: To assess the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions for preventing occupational noise exposure or occupational hearing loss compared to no intervention or alternative interventions.

Search methods: We searched the CENTRAL; PubMed; Embase; CINAHL; Web of Science; BIOSIS Previews; Cambridge Scientific Abstracts; and OSH UPDATE to 3 October 2016.

Selection criteria: We included randomised controlled trials (RCT), controlled before-after studies (CBA) and interrupted time-series (ITS) of non-clinical interventions under field conditions among workers to prevent or reduce noise exposure and hearing loss. We also collected uncontrolled case studies of engineering controls about the effect on noise exposure.

Data collection and analysis: Two authors independently assessed study eligibility and risk of bias and extracted data. We categorised interventions as engineering controls, administrative controls, personal hearing protection devices, and hearing surveillance.

Main results: We included 29 studies. One study evaluated legislation to reduce noise exposure in a 12-year time-series analysis but there were no controlled studies on engineering controls for noise exposure. Eleven studies with 3725 participants evaluated effects of personal hearing protection devices and 17 studies with 84,028 participants evaluated effects of hearing loss prevention programmes (HLPPs). Effects on noise exposure Engineering interventions following legislationOne ITS study found that new legislation in the mining industry reduced the median personal noise exposure dose in underground coal mining by 27.7 percentage points (95% confidence interval (CI) -36.1 to -19.3 percentage points) immediately after the implementation of stricter legislation. This roughly translates to a 4.5 dB(A) decrease in noise level. The intervention was associated with a favourable but statistically non-significant downward trend in time of the noise dose of -2.1 percentage points per year (95% CI -4.9 to 0.7, 4 year follow-up, very low-quality evidence). Engineering intervention case studiesWe found 12 studies that described 107 uncontrolled case studies of immediate reductions in noise levels of machinery ranging from 11.1 to 19.7 dB(A) as a result of purchasing new equipment, segregating noise sources or installing panels or curtains around sources. However, the studies lacked long-term follow-up and dose measurements of workers, and we did not use these studies for our conclusions. Hearing protection devicesIn general hearing protection devices reduced noise exposure on average by about 20 dB(A) in one RCT and three CBAs (57 participants, low-quality evidence). Two RCTs showed that, with instructions for insertion, the attenuation of noise by earplugs was 8.59 dB better (95% CI 6.92 dB to 10.25 dB) compared to no instruction (2 RCTs, 140 participants, moderate-quality evidence). Administrative controls: information and noise exposure feedbackOn-site training sessions did not have an effect on personal noise-exposure levels compared to information only in one cluster-RCT after four months' follow-up (mean difference (MD) 0.14 dB; 95% CI -2.66 to 2.38). Another arm of the same study found that personal noise exposure information had no effect on noise levels (MD 0.30 dB(A), 95% CI -2.31 to 2.91) compared to no such information (176 participants, low-quality evidence). Effects on hearing loss Hearing protection devicesIn two studies the authors compared the effect of different devices on temporary threshold shifts at short-term follow-up but reported insufficient data for analysis. In two CBA studies the authors found no difference in hearing loss from noise exposure above 89 dB(A) between muffs and earplugs at long-term follow-up (OR 0.8, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.03 ), very low-quality evidence). Authors of another CBA study found that wearing hearing protection more often resulted in less hearing loss at very long-term follow-up (very low-quality evidence). Combination of interventions: hearing loss prevention programmesOne cluster-RCT found no difference in hearing loss at three- or 16-year follow-up between an intensive HLPP for agricultural students and audiometry only. One CBA study found no reduction of the rate of hearing loss (MD -0.82 dB per year (95% CI -1.86 to 0.22) for a HLPP that provided regular personal noise exposure information compared to a programme without this information.There was very-low-quality evidence in four very long-term studies, that better use of hearing protection devices as part of a HLPP decreased the risk of hearing loss compared to less well used hearing protection in HLPPs (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.69). Other aspects of the HLPP such as training and education of workers or engineering controls did not show a similar effect.In three long-term CBA studies, workers in a HLPP had a statistically non-significant 1.8 dB (95% CI -0.6 to 4.2) greater hearing loss at 4 kHz than non-exposed workers and the confidence interval includes the 4.2 dB which is the level of hearing loss resulting from 5 years of exposure to 85 dB(A). In addition, of three other CBA studies that could not be included in the meta-analysis, two showed an increased risk of hearing loss in spite of the protection of a HLPP compared to non-exposed workers and one CBA did not.

Authors' conclusions: There is very low-quality evidence that implementation of stricter legislation can reduce noise levels in workplaces. Controlled studies of other engineering control interventions in the field have not been conducted. There is moderate-quality evidence that training of proper insertion of earplugs significantly reduces noise exposure at short-term follow-up but long-term follow-up is still needed.There is very low-quality evidence that the better use of hearing protection devices as part of HLPPs reduces the risk of hearing loss, whereas for other programme components of HLPPs we did not find such an effect. The absence of conclusive evidence should not be interpreted as evidence of lack of effectiveness. Rather, it means that further research is very likely to have an important impact.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Christina Tikka: None known.

Jos Verbeek: None known.

Erik Kateman: None known.

Thais Morata: None known.

Wouter Dreschler: None known.

Silvia Ferrite: None known.

Figures

1
1
PRISMA Study flow diagram
2
2
Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies. Please note that the blank space corresponds to the studies that have an ITS study design.
3
3
Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study. Please note that the blank spaces correspond to the studies that have an ITS study design.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Update of

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

References to studies included in this review

Adera 1993 {published data only}
    1. Adera T, Donahue AM, Malit BD, Gaydos JC. An epidemiologic method for assessing the effectiveness of hearing conservation programs using audiometric data. Military Medicine 1993;158(11):698‐701. - PubMed
Adera 2000 {published data only}
    1. Adera T, Amir C, Anderson L. Use of comparison populations for evaluating the effectiveness of hearing loss prevention programs. American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal 2000;61(1):11‐5. - PubMed
Berg 2009 {published data only}
    1. Berg RL, Pickett W, Fitz‐Randolph M, Broste SK, Knobloch MJ, Wood DJ, et al. Hearing conservation program for agricultural students: short‐term outcomes from a cluster‐randomised trial with planned long‐term follow‐up. Preventive Medicine 2009;49(6):546‐52. - PubMed
    1. Marlenga B, Linneman JG, Pickett W, Wood DJ, Kirkhorn SR, Broste SK, et al. Randomized trial of a hearing conservation intervention for rural students: long‐term outcomes. Pediatrics 2011;128(5):e1139‐46. - PubMed
Brink 2002 {published data only}
    1. Brink LL, Talbott EO, Burks JA, Palmer CV. Changes over time in audiometric thresholds in a group of automobile stamping and assembly workers with a hearing conservation program. American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal 2002;63(4):482‐7. - PubMed
Davies 2008 {published data only}
    1. Davies H, Marion S, Teschke K. The impact of hearing conservation programs on incidence of noise‐induced hearing loss in Canadian workers. American Journal of Industrial Medicine 2008;51:923‐31. - PubMed
Erlandsson 1980 {published data only}
    1. Erlandsson B, Hakanson H, Ivarsson A, Nilsson P. The difference in protection efficiency between earplugs and earmuffs. An investigation performed at a workplace. Scandinavian Audiology 1980;9(4):215‐21. - PubMed
Gosztonyi 1975 {published data only}
    1. Gosztonyi RE. The effectiveness of hearing protective devices. Journal of Occupational Medicine 1975;17(9):569‐80. - PubMed
Hager 1982 {published data only}
    1. Hager WL, Hoyle ER, Hermann ER. Efficacy of enforcement in an industrial hearing conservation program. American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal 1982;43(6):455‐65. - PubMed
Heyer 2011 {published data only}
    1. Heyer N, Morata TC, Pinkerton LE, Brueck SE, Stancescu D, Panaccio MP, et al. Use of historical data and a novel metric in the evaluation of the effectiveness of hearing conservation program components. Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2011;68(7):510‐7. [DOI: 10.1136/oem.2009.053801] - DOI - PubMed
Horie 2002 {published data only}
    1. Horie S. Improvement of occupational noise‐induced temporary threshold shift by active noise control earmuff and bone conduction microphone. Journal of Occupational Health 2002;44(6):414‐20.
Huttunen 2011 {published data only}
    1. Huttunen KH, Sivonen VP, Poykko VT. Symphony orchestra musicians' use of hearing protection and attenuation of custom‐made hearing protectors as measured with two different real‐ear attenuation at threshold methods. Noise & Health 2011;13(51):176‐88. - PubMed
Joy 2007 {published data only}
    1. Joy G, Middendorf PJ. Noise exposure and hearing conservation in US coal mines, a surveillance report. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene 2007;4:26‐35. - PubMed
Lee‐Feldstein 1993 {published data only}
    1. Lee‐Feldstein A. Five‐year follow‐up study of hearing loss at several locations within a large automobile company. American Journal of Industrial Medicine 1993;24(1):41‐54. - PubMed
Meyer 1993 {published data only}
    1. Meyer GD, Wirth DB. An evaluation of the U.S. Air Force's detailed follow‐up audiometric examination program. Military Medicine 1993;158(9):603‐5. - PubMed
Moshammer 2015 {published and unpublished data}
    1. Moshammer H, Kundi M, Wallner P, Herbst A, Feuerstein A, Hutter HP. Author response: comments on TTS as a predictor of noise‐induced hearing loss. Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2015;72(2):160‐1. - PubMed
    1. Moshammer H, Kundi M, Wallner P, Herbst A, Feuerstein A, Hutter HP. Early prognosis of noise‐induced hearing loss. Occupational & Environmental Medicine 2015;72(2):85‐9. - PubMed
Muhr 2006 {published data only}
    1. Muhr P, Månsson B, Hellström PA. A study of hearing changes among military conscripts in the Swedish army. International Journal of Audiology 2006;45:247‐51. - PubMed
Muhr 2016 {published and unpublished data}
    1. Muhr P, Johnson A‐C, Skoog B, Rosenhall U. A demonstrated positive effect of a hearing conservation program in the Swedish armed forces. International Journal of Audiology 2016;55(3):168‐72. - PubMed
Nilsson 1980 {published data only}
    1. Nilsson R, Lindgren F. The effect of long term use of hearing protectors in industrial noise. Scandinavian Audiology 1980;Suppl 12:204‐11. - PubMed
Pääkkönen 1998 {published data only}
    1. Pääkkönen R, Lehtomaki K, Savolainen S. Noise attenuation of communication hearing protectors against impulses from assault rifle. Military Medicine 1998;163(1):40‐3. - PubMed
Pääkkönen 2001 {published data only}
    1. Pääkkönen R, Kuronen P, Korteoja M. Active noise reduction in aviation helmets during a military jet trainer test flight. Scandinavian Audiology Supplementum 2001;52:177‐9. - PubMed
Park 1991a instructions {published data only}
    1. Park MY, Casali JG. A controlled investigation of in‐field attenuation performance of selected insert, earmuff, and canal cap hearing protectors. Human Factors 1991;33(6):693‐714. - PubMed
Park 1991b protection {published data only}
    1. Park MY, Casali JG. A controlled investigation of in‐field attenuation performance of selected insert, earmuff, and canal cap hearing protectors. Human Factors 1991;33(6):693‐714. - PubMed
Pell 1973 {published data only}
    1. Pell S. An evaluation of hearing conservation program ‐ a five‐year longitudinal study. American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal 1973;34(2):82‐91. - PubMed
Rabinowitz 2011 {published data only}
    1. Rabinowitz PM, Galusha D, Kirsche SR, Cullen MR, Slade MD, Dixon‐Ernst C. Effect of daily noise exposure monitoring on annual rates of hearing loss in industrial workers. Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2011;68(6):414‐8. - PMC - PubMed
Reynolds 1990a {published data only}
    1. Reynolds JL, Royster LH, Pearson RG. Hearing conservation programs (HCPs): the effectiveness of one company's HCP in a 12‐hr work shift environment. American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal 1990;51(8):437‐46. - PubMed
Royster 1980 {published data only}
    1. Royster LH. An evaluation of the effectiveness of two different insert types of ear protection in preventing TTS in an industrial environment. American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal 1980;41(3):161‐9. - PubMed
Salmani 2014 {published data only}
    1. Salmani Nodoushan M, Mehrparvar AH, Torab Jahromi M, Safaei S, Mollasadeghi A. Training in using earplugs or using earplugs with a higher than necessary noise reduction rating? A randomized clinical trial. International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2014;5:187‐93. - PMC - PubMed
Seixas 2011 {published data only}
    1. Seixas NS, Neitzel R, Stover B, Sheppard L, Daniell B, Edelson J. A multi‐component intervention to promote hearing protector use among construction workers. International Journal of Audiology 2011; Vol. 50:s46‐s56. - PMC - PubMed
Simpson 1994 {published data only}
    1. Simpson TH, Stewart M, Kaltenbach JA. Early indicators of hearing conservation program performance. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 1994;5:300‐6. - PubMed

References to studies excluded from this review

Aybek 2010 {published data only}
    1. Aybek A, Kamer HA, Arslan S. Personal noise exposures of operators of agricultural tractors. Applied Ergonomics 2010;41:274‐81. - PubMed
Bealko 2009 {published data only}
    1. Bealko SB. Mining haul truck cab noise: an evaluation of three acoustical environments. Mining Engineering 2009;61(10):36‐42.
Bockstael 2008 {published data only}
    1. Bockstael A, Keppler H, Dhooge I, D'haenens W, Maes L, Philips B, et al. Effectiveness of hearing protector devices in impulse noise verified with transiently evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions. International Journal of Audiology 2008;47:119‐33. - PubMed
Bowes 1990 {published data only}
    1. Bowes SM, Corn M. Noise exposure reduction aboard an oceangoing hopper dredge. American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal 1990;51(9):469‐4. - PubMed
Brueck 2009 {published data only}
    1. Brueck L. Real world use and performance of hearing protection. Health and Safety Executive, 2009.
Brühl 1994 {published data only}
    1. Bruhl P, Ivarsson A. Noise‐exposed male sheet‐metal workers using hearing protectors. A longitudinal study of hearing threshold shifts covering fifteen years. Scandinavian Audiology 1994;23(2):123‐8. - PubMed
Byrne 2011 {published data only}
    1. Byrne DC, Davis RR, Shaw PB, Specht BM, Holl AN. Relationship between comfort and attenuation measurements for two types of earplugs. Noise & Health 2011;13(51):86‐92. - PubMed
Casali 2009 {published data only}
    1. Casali JG, Ahroon WA, Lancaster JA. A field investigation of hearing protection and hearing enhancement in one device: for soldiers whose ears and lives depend upon it. Noise & Health 2009;11(42):69‐90. - PubMed
Chou 2009 {published data only}
    1. Chou YF, Lai JS, Kuo HW. Effects of shift work on noise‐induced hearing loss. Noise & Health 2009;11(45):185‐8. - PubMed
Franks 2000 {published data only}
    1. Franks JR, Murphy WJ, Johnson JL, Harris DA. Four earplugs in search of a rating system. Ear and Hearing 2000;21(3):218‐26. - PubMed
Giardino 1996 {published data only}
    1. Giardino DA, Durkt G. Evaluation of muff‐type hearing protectors as used in a working environment. American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal 1996;57(3):264‐71. - PubMed
Golmohammadi 2010 {published data only}
    1. Golmohammadi R, Monazzam MR, Nourollahi M, Nezafat A, Fard SMB. Evaluation of noise propagation characteristics of compressors in Tehran oil refinery centre and presenting control methods. Journal of Research in Health Sciences 2010;10(1):22‐30. - PubMed
Griest 2008 {published data only}
    1. Griest S. Evaluation of a hearing‐loss prevention program. Seminars in Hearing 2008;29(1):122‐36.
Groothoff 1999 {published data only}
    1. Groothoff B. Incorporating effective noise control in music entertainment venues? Yes, it can be done. Journal of Occupational Health & Safety ‐ Australia & New Zealand 1999;15(6):543‐50.
Jelinic 2005 {published data only}
    1. Jelinic JD, Mustajbegovic J, Zuskin E, Lukic J, Cavar V, Ivankovic A. Managing occupational safety and health in aluminium production: case study of aluminium production factory, Mostar, Bosnia and Herzegovina. Croatian Medical Journal 2005;46(5):838‐47. - PubMed
Kardous 2003 {published data only}
    1. Kardous CA, Willson RD, Hayden CS, Szlapa P, Murphy WJ, Reeves EF. Noise exposure assessment and abatement strategies at an indoor firing range. Applied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene 2003;18:629‐36. - PubMed
Karlsmose 2001 {published data only}
    1. Karlsmose B, Lauritzen T, Engberg M, Parving A. A randomised controlled trial of screening for adult hearing loss during preventive health checks. British Journal of General Practice 2001;51(466):351‐5. - PMC - PubMed
Kavraz 2009 {published data only}
    1. Kavraz M, Abdulrahimov R. A study comparing the noise reduction behavior of variously shaped barriers of limited size in indoor spaces. Indoor and Built Environment 2009;18(6):541‐52.
Knothe 1999 {published data only}
    1. Knothe E, Busche H‐J. Noise reduction in scrap treatment facilities. Zeitschrift fur Larmbekampfung 1999;46(6):210‐3.
Kotarbinska 2009 {published data only}
    1. Kotarbinska E, Kozlowski E. Measurement of Effective Noise Exposure of Workers Wearing Ear‐Muffs. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics 2009;15(2):193‐200. - PubMed
Lempert 1983 {published data only}
    1. Lempert B, Edwards R. Field investigations of noise reduction afforded by insert‐type hearing protectors. American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal 1983;44(12):894‐902. - PubMed
Lutz 2015 {published data only}
    1. Lutz EA, Reed RJ, Turner D, Littau SR, Lee V, Hu CC. Effectiveness evaluation of existing noise controls in a deep shaft underground mine. Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene 2015;12(5):287‐93. - PubMed
Mechfske 2002 {published data only}
    1. Mechefske CK, Geris R, Gati JS, Rutt BK. Acoustic noise reduction in a 4 T MRI scanner. MAGMA 2002;13(3):172‐6. - PubMed
Merry 1992 {published data only}
    1. Merry CJ, Sizemore CW, Franks JR. The effect of fitting procedure on hearing protector attenuation. Ear & Hearing 1992;13(1):11‐8. - PubMed
Monazzam 2011 {published data only}
    1. Monazzam MR, Golmohammadi R, Nourollahi M, Fard SMB. Assessment and control design for steam vent noise in an oil refinery. Journal of Research in Health Sciences 2011;1(1):14‐9. - PubMed
Mrena 2008 {published data only}
    1. Mrena R, Ylikoski J, Kiukaanniemi H, Makitie AA, Savolainen S. The effect of improved hearing protection regulations in the prevention of military noise‐induced hearing loss. Acta Oto‐Laryngologica 2008;128(9):997‐1003. - PubMed
Murphy 2011 {published data only}
    1. Murphy WJ, Stephenson MR, Byrne DC, Witt B, Duran J. Effects of training on hearing protector attenuation. Noise & Health 2011;13(51):132‐41. - PubMed
Nair 2009 {published data only}
    1. Nair S, Kashyap RC. Prevalence of noise induced hearing loss in Indian Air Force personnel. Medical Journal Armed Forces India 2009;65(3):247‐51. - PMC - PubMed
Neitzel 2005 {published data only}
    1. Neitzel R, Seixas N. The effectiveness of hearing protection among construction workers. Journal of Occupational & Environmental Hygiene 2005;2(4):227‐38. - PubMed
Neitzel 2008 {published data only}
    1. Neitzel R, Meischke H, Daniell W, Trabeau M, Somers S, Seixas NS. Development and pilot test of hearing conservation training for construction workers. American Journal of Industrial Medicine 2008;51(2):120‐9. - PubMed
Niskanen 2001 {published data only}
    1. Niskanen J, Anttonen H. Ways to promote a noise control programme. Scandinavian Audiology 2001;30(52):174‐6. - PubMed
Oestenstad 2008 {published data only}
    1. Oestenstad RK, Norman MW, Borton TE. Efficacy of the US Army Policy on Hearing Conservation Programs. Military Medicine 2008;173(10):992‐8. - PubMed
Pääkkönen 2005 {published data only}
    1. Paakkonen R, Lehtomaki K. Protection efficiency of hearing protectors against military noise from handheld weapons and vehicles. Noise & Health 2005;7(26):11‐20. - PubMed
Pearlman 2009 {published data only}
    1. Pearlman RT, Sandidge O. Noise characteristics of surgical space suits. Orthopedics 2009;32(11):825. - PubMed
Pingle 2006 {published data only}
    1. Pingle S, Shanbag S. CASH ‐ an innovative approach to sustainable OSH improvement at workplace. Medicina del Lavoro 2006;97(2):358‐67. - PubMed
Randolph 2008 {published data only}
    1. Randolph RF, Kissell FN, NIOSH. The effect of an insertion lubricant on the noise attenuation of foam earplugs. NOISE‐CON. Institute of Noise Control Engineering 2008:1‐4.
Reeves 2009 {published data only}
    1. Reeves ER, Randolph RF, Yantek DS, Peterson JS, NIOSH. Noise control in underground metal mining. Information circular 2009; Vol. IC 9518:1‐62.
Reynolds 1990b {published data only}
    1. Reynolds JL, Royster LH, Pearson RG. Hearing conservation programs (HCPs): the effectiveness of one company's HCP in a 12‐hr work shift environment. American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal 1990;51(8):437‐46. - PubMed
Sataloff 2010 {published data only}
    1. Sataloff J, Hawkshaw MJ, Sataloff RT. "Gun‐shooting hearing loss": A pilot study. Ear, Nose and Throat Journal 2010;89(1):E15‐E19. - PubMed
Scannell 1998 {published data only}
    1. Scannell K. Low‐cost methods of noise control at source which increase production and reduce the risk of hearing damage. Journal of Occupational Health & Safety ‐ Australia & New Zealand 1998;14(5):493‐503.
Schaefer 1992 {published data only}
    1. Schaefer PD. Successful noise abatement program relies on engineering controls. Occupational Health & Safety 1992;61(10):82‐6. - PubMed
Smith 2006 {published data only}
    1. Smith AK, Spencer ER, Alcorn LA, Kovalchik PG. Underground evaluation of coated flight bars for a continuous mining machine [The 35th International Congress and Exposition on Noise Control Engineering, 3‐6 December 2006]. International Institute of Noise Control Engineering. Honolulu, Hawaii. West Lafayette, 2006 Dec:1‐8.
Smith 2009 {published data only}
    1. Smith AK, Kovalchik PG, Alcorn LA, Matetic RJ. A dual sprocket chain as a noise control for a continuous mining machine. Noise Control Engineering Journal 2009;57(5):413‐9.
Smith 2011 {published data only}
    1. Smith AK, Zimmerman JJ, Michael R, Kovalchik PG. Modified tail section reduces noise on a continuous mining machine. Mining Engineering 2011;63(7):83‐5.
Stone 1971 {published data only}
    1. Stone GF, Freman TW, Craig RL. Noise control and hearing conservation in large steam‐electric generating stations. American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal 1971;32(2):123‐30. - PubMed
Toivonen 2002 {published data only}
    1. Toivonen M, Pääkkönen R, Savolainen S, Lehtomäki K. Noise attenuation and proper insertion of earplugs into ear canals. Annals of Occupational Hygiene 2002;46(6):527‐30. - PubMed
Tsukada 2008 {published data only}
    1. Tsukada T, Sakakibara H. A trail of individual education for hearing protection with an instrument that measures the noise attenuation effect of wearing earplugs. Industrial Health 2008;46(4):393‐6. - PubMed
Walter 2009 {published data only}
    1. Walter JS. Sound exposure levels experienced by university wind band members. Medical Problems of Performing Artists 2009;24(2):63‐70.
Waugh 1990 {published data only}
    1. Waugh R, Forcier L. Research workshop paper: sense of sound. Australian Deafness Council project. Journal of Occupational Health and Safety 1990;6(5):399‐401.
Williams 2004 {published data only}
    1. Williams W. Instruction and the improvement of hearing protector performance. Noise & Health 2004;7(25):41‐7. - PubMed
Wu 2009 {published data only}
    1. Wu CC, Young YH. Ten‐year longitudinal study of the effect of impulse noise exposure from gunshot on inner ear function. International Journal of Audiology 2009;48(9):655‐60. - PubMed

Additional references

ANSI/ASA 2007
    1. ANSI/ASA. American national standard methods of estimating effective A‐weighted sound pressure levels when hearing protectors are worn. ANSI S12.68‐2007. Melville, NY: Acoustical Society of America 2007.
ANSI/ASA 2008
    1. ANSI/ASA. American national standard methods for measuring the real‐ear attenuation of hearing protectors. ANSI S12.6‐2008 (Revision of ANSI S12.6‐1997). Melville, NY: Acoustical Society of America 2008.
Azman 2012
    1. Azman AS, Yantek DS, Alcorn LA. Evaluations of a noise control for roof bolting machines. Mining Engineering 2012;64(12):64‐70. - PMC - PubMed
Berger 1996
    1. Berger EH, Franks JR, Lindgren F. International Review of Feld Studies of Hearing Protector Attenuation. In: Axlesson A, Borchgrevink H, Hamernik RP, Hellstrom P, Henderson D, Salvi RJ editor(s). Scientific Basis of Noise‐induced Hearing Loss. New York: Thieme Medical Publishing, 1996:361‐77.
Berger 1998
    1. Berger EH, Franks JR, Behar A, Casali JG, Dixon‐Ernst C, Kieper RW, et al. Development of a new standard laboratory protocol for estimating the field attenuation of hearing protection devices. Part III. The validity of subject‐fit data. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America 1998;103:665‐72. - PubMed
Borchgrevink 2003
    1. Borchgrevink HM. Does health promotion work in relation to noise?. Noise & Health 2003;5(18):25‐30. - PubMed
Caillet 2012
    1. Caillet J, Marrot F, Unia Y, Aubourg PA. Comprehensive approach for noise reduction in helicopter cabins. Aerospace Science and Technology 2012;23(1):17‐25.
Chinn 2000
    1. Chinn S. A simple method for converting an odds ratio to effect size for use in meta‐analysis. Statistics in Medicine 2000;19:3127‐31. - PubMed
Cockrell 2015
    1. Cockrell TW, Balanay JAG, Dawkins W. Engineering control of noise from 4‐roll calender operations in tire manufacturing. Journal of Occupational & Environmental Hygiene 2015;12(9):D193‐200. - PubMed
Daniell 2006
    1. Daniell WE, Swan SS, McDaniel MM, Camp JE, Cohen MA, Stebbins JG. Noise exposure and hearing loss prevention programmes after 20 years of regulations in the United States. Occupational & Environmental Medicine 2006;63(5):343‐51. - PMC - PubMed
Deeks 2011
    1. Deeks JJ, Higgins JPT, Altman DG (editors). Chapter 9: Analysing data and undertaking meta‐analyses. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from handbook.cochrane.org.
Dobie 1995
    1. Dobie RA. Prevention of noise‐induced hearing loss. Archives of Otolaryngology ‐ Head and Neck Surgery 1995;121(4):385‐91. - PubMed
Downs 1998
    1. Downs SH, Black N. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non‐randomised studies of health care interventions. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 1998;52(6):377‐84. - PMC - PubMed
Ellenbecker 1996
    1. Ellenbecker MJ. Engineering controls as an intervention to reduce worker exposure. American Journal of Industrial Medicine 1996;29(4):303‐7. - PubMed
EPOC 2012
    1. Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) Review Group. The data collection checklist. www.epoc.cochrane.org (accessed 10 March 2012).
EU 2003
    1. EU. Directive 2003/10/EC on the minimum health and safety requirements regarding exposure of workers to the risks arising from physical agents (noise). EU 2003.
EU‐OSHA 2009
    1. European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. Combined exposure to noise and ototoxic substances. European Risk Observatory Literature Review 2009:1‐62.
Glasziou 2007
    1. Glasziou P, Chalmers I, Rawlins M, McCulloch P. When are randomised trials unnecessary? Picking signal from noise. BMJ 2007;334:349‐51. - PMC - PubMed
Golmohammadi 2014
    1. Golmohammadi R, Giahi O, Aliabadi M, Darvishi E. An intervention for noise control of blast furnace in steel industry. Journal of Research in Health Sciences 2014;14(4):287‐90. - PubMed
Haron 2009
    1. Haron Z, Yahya K, Mohamad MI. Probability approach for prediction of construction site noise. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering 2009;8(2):571‐7.
Helleman 2010
    1. Helleman HW, Jansen EJM, Dreschler WA. Otoacoustic emissions in a hearing conservation program: general applicability in longitudinal monitoring and the relation to changes in pure‐tone thresholds. International Journal of Audiology 2010;49(6):410‐19. - PubMed
Higgins 2003
    1. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta‐analyses. BMJ 2003;327:557‐60. - PMC - PubMed
Higgins 2011a
    1. Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Sterne JAC (editors). Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from handbook.cochrane.org.
Higgins 2011b
    1. Higgins JPT, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (editors). Chapter 16: Special topics in statistics. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors), Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from handbook.cochrane.org.
Hozo 2005
    1. Hozo S Djulbegovic B, Hozo I. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range and the size of a sample. BMC Medical Research Methodology 2005;5:13. - PMC - PubMed
HSE 2013
    1. HSE. Sound solutions for the food and drink industries: reducing noise in food and drink manufacture. HSG232. 2nd Edition. Health and safety executive, 2013:77.
HSE 2015
    1. HSE. A recipe for safety: health and safety in food and drink manufacture. HSG252. 2nd Edition. Health and safety executive, 2015.
ISO 1990
    1. ISO ‐ International Standard Organisation. ISO 1999: Acoustics ‐ Determination of occupational noise exposure and estimation of noise‐induced hearing impairment. Geneva: ISO, 1990.
ISO 1999b
    1. ISO International Standard Organisation. ISO 4869‐1: Acoustics ‐ Hearing Protectors ‐ Part 1: Subjective method for the measurement of sound attenuation. Geneva: ISO 1990.
ISO 2006
    1. ISO, International Standard Organisation. ISO 4869‐5: Acoustics ‐ Hearing Protectors ‐ Part 5: Method for estimation of noise reduction using fitting by inexperienced test subjects. Geneva: ISO 2006.
John 2012
    1. John AB, Kreisman BM, Pallett S. Validity of hearing impairment calculation methods for prediction of self‐reported hearing handicap. Noise Health 2012;14:13‐20. - PubMed
Johnson 2010
    1. Johnson AC, Morata TC. Occupational exposure to chemicals and hearing impairment. Arbete och Halsa 2010;44:1‐177. [https://gupea.ub.gu.se/bitstream/2077/23240/1/gupea_2077_23240_1.pdf]
Kirchner 2012
    1. Kirchner DB, Evenson E, Dobie RA, Rabinowitz P, Crawford J, Kopke R, et al. Occupational noise‐induced hearing loss: ACOEM Task Force on Occupational Hearing Loss. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2012;54(1):106‐8. - PubMed
Küpper 2013
    1. Küpper T, Jansing P, Schöffl V, Giet S. Does modern helicopter construction reduce noise exposure in helicopter rescue operations?. Annals of Occupational Hygiene 2013;57(1):34‐42. - PubMed
Le Prell 2012
    1. Prell CG, Bao J. Prevention of Noise‐induced Hearing Loss: Potential Therapeutic Agents. In: Prell CG, Henderson D, Fay RR, Popper AN editor(s). Noise‐Induced Hearing Loss: Scientific Advances. New York: Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, 2012:285‐338.
Leigh 1999
    1. Leigh J, Macaskill P, Kuosma E, Mandryk J. Global burden of disease and injury due to occupational factors. Epidemiology 1999;10(5):626‐31. - PubMed
Lynch 2005
    1. Lynch ED, Kil J. Compounds for the prevention and treatment of noise‐induced hearing loss. Drugs Discovery Today 2005;10:1291‐8. - PubMed
Maling 2016
    1. Maling GC Jr, Wood EW, Lotz G, Lang WW. Reducing employee noise exposure in manufacturing: best practices, innovative techniques, and the workplace of the future. Institute of Noise Control Engineering of the USA 2016.
Martinson 1999
    1. Martinson BC, Murray DM, Jeffery RW, Hennrikus DJ. Intraclass correlations for measures from a work site health promotion study: estimates, correlates and applications. American Journal of Health Promotion 1999;13(6):347‐57. - PubMed
Masterson 2015
    1. Masterson EA, Deddens JA, Themann CL, Bertke S, Calvert GM. Trends in worker hearing loss by industry sector, 1981‐2010. American Journal of Industrial Medicine 2015;58(4):392‐401. [DOI: 10.1002/ajim.22429] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Masterson 2016a
    1. Masterson EA, Themann CL, Luckhaupt SE, Li J, Calvert GM. Hearing difficulty and tinnitus among U.S. workers and non‐workers in 2007. American Journal of Industrial Medicine 2016;59(4):290‐300. [DOI: 10.1002/ajim.22565] - DOI - PubMed
Masterson 2016b
    1. Masterson EA, Bushnell PT, Themann CL, Morata TC. Hearing impairment among noise‐exposed workers ‐ United States, 2003‐2012. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 2016;65(15):389‐94. [DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6515a2] - DOI - PubMed
May 2000
    1. May JJ. Occupational hearing loss. American Journal of Occupational Medicine 2000;37:112‐20. - PubMed
McBride 2004
    1. McBride DI. Noise‐induced hearing loss and hearing conservation in mining. Occupational Medicine 2004;54(5):290‐6. - PubMed
Morata 2015
    1. Morata T, Hayden C, Driscoll D, Stephenson CM, Clegg PM, Afanuh S. Preventing hazardous noise and hearing loss during project design and operation. Workplace design solutions, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health 2015.
Murphy 2008
    1. Murphy WJ. How to assess hearing protection evaluation effectiveness: what is new in ANSI/ASA S12.68. Acoustics Today 2008;4:40‐2.
Neitzel 2011
    1. Neitzel RL, Stover B, Seixas NS. Longitudinal assessment of noise exposure in a cohort of construction workers. Annals of Occupational Hygiene 2011;55(8):906‐16. - PMC - PubMed
Nelson 2005
    1. Nelson DI, Nelson RY, Concha‐Barrientos M, Fingerhut M. The global burden of occupational noise‐induced hearing loss. American Journal of Industrial Medicine 2005;48(6):446‐58. - PubMed
NIOSH 1997
    1. Cohen AL, Gjessing CC, Fine LJ, Bernard BP, McGlothin JD. Elements of ergonomics programs, a primer based on workplace evaluations of musculoskeletal disorders. Publication No. 97–117. Cincinnati OH: Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), 1997.
NIOSH 1998
    1. NIOSH. Criteria for a recommended standard: occupational noise exposure, revised criteria 1998. Publication no 98‐126. Cincinnati OH: NIOSH 1998.
Pan 2016
    1. Pan J, Paurobally R, Qiu XJ. Active noise control in workplaces. Acoustics Australia 2016;44(1):45‐50.
Piaggio 2006
    1. Piaggio G, Elbourne DR, Altman DG, Pocock SJ, Evans SJW. Reporting of non‐inferiority and equivalence randomised trials. JAMA 2006;295:1152‐60. - PubMed
Prince 1997
    1. Prince MM, Stayner LT, Smith RJ, Gilbert SJ. A re‐examination of risk estimates from the NIOSH Occupational Noise and Hearing Survey (ONHS). Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1997;101(2):950‐63. - PubMed
Rabinowitz 2007
    1. Rabinowitz PM, Galusha D, Dixon‐Ernst, Slade MD. Audiometric early flags for occupational hearing loss. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2007;12:1310‐6. - PubMed
Ramsay 2003
    1. Ramsay CR, Matowe L, Grilli R, Grimshaw JM, Thomas RE. Interrupted time series designs in health technology assessment: lessons from two systematic reviews of behavior change strategies. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 2003;19(4):613‐23. - PubMed
RevMan 2014 [Computer program]
    1. Nordic Cochrane Centre. The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager 5 (RevMan 5). Version 5.3. Copenhagen: Nordic Cochrane Centre. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014.
Royster 1996
    1. Royster JD, Berger EH, Merry CJ, Nixon CW, Franks JR, Behar A, et al. Development of a new standard laboratory protocol for estimating the field attenuation of hearing protection devices. Part I. Research of Working Group 11, Accredited Standards Committee S12, Noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1996;99:1506‐26. - PubMed
Seixas 2001
    1. Seixas NS, Ren K, Neitzel R, Camp J, Yost M. Noise exposure among construction electricians. American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal 2001;62(5):615‐21. - PubMed
Sulkowski 2007
    1. Sulkowski WJ. Occupational Noise. In: Luxon LM, Prasher D editor(s). Noise and its effects. West Sussex, England: Whurr Publisher Limited, 2007:397‐434.
Suter 2002
    1. Suter AH. Construction noise: exposure, effects, and the potential for remediation; a review and analysis. American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal 2002;63(6):768‐89. - PubMed
Suter 2009
    1. Suter AH. The hearing conservation amendment: 25 years later. Noise & Health 2009;11(42):2‐7. - PubMed
Tak 2009
    1. Tak SW. Noise, hearing protector use, and hearing loss in American workers. The Newsletter of the Council for Accreditation in Occupational Hearing Conservation 2009;21(2):5‐6.
Thompson 2015
    1. Thompson J K. Noise control of large mining machines. inter.noise The 44th International Congress and Exposition on Noise Control Engineering, August 9‐12, 2015, San Francisco, California. 2015.
Trabeau 2008
    1. Trabeau M, Neitzel R, Meischke H, Daniel WE, Seixas NS. A comparison of "Train‐the‐Trainer" and expert training modalities for hearing protection use in construction. American Journal of Industrial Medicine 2008;51(2):130‐7. - PubMed
Verbeek 2005
    1. Verbeek J, Salmi J, Pasternack I, Jauhiainen M, Laamanen I, Schaafsma F, et al. A search strategy for occupational health intervention studies. Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2005;62(10):682‐7. - PMC - PubMed
WHO 2002
    1. WHO ‐ World Health Organization. The World Health Report (Chapter 4) Selected occupational risks. www.who.int/wht/2002/chapter 4/en/index8.html. WHO, 2002.
Wilson 2016
    1. Wilson P. Top 10 Noise Control Techniques: 2015. Acoustics Australia 2016;44:33‐43.

References to other published versions of this review

Verbeek 2014
    1. Verbeek JH, Kateman E, Morata TC, Dreschler WA, Mischke C. Interventions to prevent occupational noise‐induced hearing loss: a Cochrane systematic review. International Journal of Audiology 2014;53(Suppl 2):84‐96. [DOI: 10.3109/14992027.857436] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Verbeek 2015
    1. Verbeek JH, Kateman E, Morata TC, Dreschler WA, Mischke C. The effectiveness of interventions to prevent occupational noise‐induced hearing loss: a Cochrane systematic review [Efetividade das intervenções para prevenção de perda auditiva ocupacional induzida por ruído: uma Revisão Sistemática Cochrane]. In: Boéchat E, Menezes PL, Couto CM, Frizzo ACF, Scharlach RC, Anastacio ART editor(s). Tratado de Audiologia. 2nd Edition. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Coogan Ltda, 2015:211‐224. [ISBN 978‐85‐277‐2732‐7]

Publication types

MeSH terms