Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Feb;16(2):200-208.
doi: 10.2450/2017.0176-16. Epub 2017 May 30.

Enhanced opsonisation of Rhesus D-positive human red blood cells by recombinant polymeric immunoglobulin G anti-G antibodies

Affiliations

Enhanced opsonisation of Rhesus D-positive human red blood cells by recombinant polymeric immunoglobulin G anti-G antibodies

Dylana Díaz-Solano et al. Blood Transfus. 2018 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Anti-RhD antibodies (anti-D) are important in the prophylaxis of haemolytic disease of the foetus and newborn (HDFN) due to RhD incompatibility. Current preparations of anti-D are sourced from hyperimmune human plasma, so its production carries a risk of disease and is dependent on donor availability. Despite the efforts to develop a monoclonal preparation with similar prophylactic properties to the plasma-derived anti-D, no such antibody is yet available. Here we studied the agglutinating, opsonic and haemolytic activities of two recombinant polymeric immunoglobulins (Ig) against the G antigen of the Rh complex.

Materials and methods: Recombinant polymeric anti-G IgG1 (IgG1μtp) and IgG3 (IgG3μtp) were produced in vitro, purified by protein G-affinity chromatography, and analysed by gel electrophoresis. Their agglutinating, opsonic and haemolytic activities were evaluated using haemagglutination, erythrophagocytosis, and complement activation assays.

Results: The recombinant IgG1μtp and IgG3μtp anti-G antibodies ranged from 150,000 to 1,000,000 Da in molecular weight, indicating the formation of polymeric IgG. No complement activation or haemolytic activity was detected upon incubation of RhD-positive red-blood cells with the polymeric anti-G IgG. Both polymers were better opsonins than a prophylactic preparation of plasma-derived anti-D.

Discussion: The enhanced opsonic properties of the polymeric anti-G IgG1μtp and IgG3μtp could allow them to mediate the clearance of RhD-positive red blood cells from circulation more efficiently than natural or other synthetic prophylactic anti-D options. Their inability to induce complement-mediated haemolysis would be prophylactically convenient and is comparable in vitro to that of the available plasma-derived polyclonal anti-D preparations. The described properties suggest that polymeric antibodies like these (but with anti-D specificity) may be testable candidates for prophylaxis of HDFN caused by anti-D.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The Authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Anti-G IgGμtp molecules form polymers. The SDS-PAGE analysis of the recombinant anti-G antibodies was performed using purified proteins. Samples were analysed under (A) non-reducing and (B) reducing conditions, and stained with (A) AgNO3 or (B) Coomasie blue. Lane 1: monomeric IgG1; lane 2: polymeric IgG1μtp; lane 3: monomeric IgG3; lane 4: polymeric IgG3μtp; lane 5: commercial IgM. Positions of the molecular weight protein standards are indicated. “H” and “L” refer to Ig heavy and light chains, respectively. Ig: immunoglobulin.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Polymeric anti-G IgGμtp antibodies induce direct haemagglutination. Aliquots of 30 μL of a 2% v/v suspension of group O RhD-positive RBC were mixed and incubated in a U-bottomed 96-well microplate with 50 μL of serial double-dilutions (from undiluted [column 1] up to a 1:1,024 dilution [column 11]) of purified anti-G antibodies: monomeric IgG1 (row A) or IgG3 (row B); or polymeric IgG1μtp (row C) or IgG3μtp (row D). The pattern of spontaneous sedimentation was visually assessed as a measure of haemagglutination. A commercial monoclonal anti-D IgG/IgM blend (P: positive) and plasma-derived anti-D Ig (N: negative) were used as controls. Ig: immunoglobulin.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Microscopic evaluation of the erythrophagocytosis induced by polymeric anti-G IgGμtp antibodies. Group O RhD-positive RBC (targets) were sensitised with the different opsonins at a concentration of 3 μg/mL and added to monolayers of thioglycolate-elicited mouse peritoneal macrophages (effectors) at a 5 to 1 target-to-effector ratio. The target and effector cells were examined by light microscopy after incubation at 37 °C for 3 hours. Frame “A” shows a representative image of the control condition (phagocytic cells exposed to unsensitised RBC). The other frames contain representative images taken from samples in which the RBC were sensitised with (B) plasma-derived polyclonal anti-D, (C) monomeric anti-G IgG1, (D) monomeric anti-G IgG3, (E) polymeric anti-G IgG1μtp, or (F) polymeric anti-G IgG3μtp. The images shown (x200) are representative of three independent experiments, in which each condition was tested in triplicate. Ig: immunoglobulin; RBC: red blood cell.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Polymeric anti-G IgGμtp antibodies are better opsonins than plasma-derived polyclonal anti-D. Phagocytic cells and sensitised group O Rh-positive RBC were mixed and incubated as indicated in the legend of Figure 3. After lysing and washing off the non-phagocytosed erythrocytes, the remaining cells (macrophages containing ingested RBC) were lysed and the haemoglobin released was quantified at 630 nm. A standard curve of haemoglobin versus optical density was used to equate absorbance values to RBC numbers, which were converted to a percentage of phagocytosis. Data shown are the arithmetic mean ± standard deviation of three independent experiments, each performed in triplicate. “IgG1μtp=IgG3μtp” means a blend containing equal amounts of each polymeric antibody; “IgG1μtp>IgG3μtp” means a blend containing 75% polymeric IgG1μtp and 25% polymeric IgG3μtp. Statistically significant differences were calculated after Bonferroni’s correction (n= 16) and are indicated with one (p<0.0001) or two asterisks (p<0.001). Ig: immunoglobulin; RBC: red blood cell.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Polymeric anti-G IgGμtp antibodies do not induce complement-mediated haemolysis. Group A RhD-positive (empty bars) or O RhD-positive (black-filled bars) RBC were sensitised with the antibodies indicated in the figure, and then mixed and incubated with autologous plasma as a source of complement. The haemolysis was quantified and normalised to a percentage as detailed in the text and in the online supplementary document. Data shown are the arithmetic mean ± standard deviation of three independent experiments, each performed in triplicate. “IgG1μtp=IgG3μtp” and “IgG1μtp>IgG3μtp” mean the same as indicated in the legend of Figure 4. Statistically significant differences were calculated after Bonferroni’s correction (n= 16) and are indicated with one asterisk (p<0.0001). RBC: red blood cell.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Polymeric anti-G IgGμtp antibodies do not induce C3d deposition on the membrane of RhD-positive RBC. Group A RhD-positive RBC were suspended in HBS-BSA buffer containing (A) no antibody, (B) monoclonal anti-A IgM (a culture supernatant diluted at 1:262,144), (C) monomeric anti-G IgG3 (80 ng/mL), (D) polymeric anti-G IgG1μtp (9 ng/mL), or (E) polymeric anti-G IgG3μtp (9 ng/mL). The sensitised RBC were then incubated with autologous plasma, and finally with an IgM anti-C3d agglutinating reagent. The images shown (X 200) are representative of three independent experiments, in which each condition was tested in triplicate. RBC: red blood cell; HBS-BSA: hepes-buffered saline containing 0.1% bovine serum albumin.

Similar articles

References

    1. Anstee DJ, Tanner MJA. Biochemical aspects of the blood group Rh (Rhesus) antigens. Baillieres Clin Haematol. 1993;6:401–22. - PubMed
    1. Mollison PL, Engelfriet CP, Contreras M. The Rh blood group system (and LW) In: Klein HG, Anstee DJ, editors. Mollison’s Blood Transfusion in Clinical Medicine. 11th ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2005. pp. 163–208.
    1. Kumpel BM. Efficacy of Rh(D) monoclonal antibodies in clinical trials as replacement therapy for prophylactic anti-D immunoglobulin: more questions than answers. Vox Sang. 2007;93:99–111. - PubMed
    1. Bowman J. Rh-immunoglobulin: Rh prophylaxis. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2006;19:27–34. - PubMed
    1. Kent J, Farrel AM, Soothill P. Routine administration of Anti-D: the ethical case for offering pregnant women fetal RHD genotyping and a review of policy and practice. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:87. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms