Professionals' preferences in prenatal counseling at the limits of viability: a nationwide qualitative Dutch study
- PMID: 28687856
- PMCID: PMC5511326
- DOI: 10.1007/s00431-017-2952-6
Professionals' preferences in prenatal counseling at the limits of viability: a nationwide qualitative Dutch study
Abstract
Prenatal counseling practices at the limits of viability do vary, and constructing a counseling framework based on guidelines, professional and parental preferences, might achieve more homogeneity. We aimed to gain insight into professionals' preferences on three domains of counseling, particularly content, organization, and decision making and their influencing factors. A qualitative, nationwide in-depth exploration among Dutch perinatal professionals by semi-structured interviews in focus groups was performed. Regarding content of prenatal counseling, preparing parents on the short-term situation (delivery room care) and revealing their perspectives on "quality of life" were considered important. Parents should be informed on the kind of decision, on the difficulty of individual outcome predictions, on survival and mortality figures, short- and long-term morbidity, and the burden of hospitalization. For organization, the making of and compliance with agreements between professionals may promote joint counseling by neonatologists and obstetricians. Supportive materials were considered useful but only when up-to-date, in addition to the discussion and with opportunity for personalization. Regarding decision making, it is not always clear to parents that a prenatal decision needs to be made and they can participate, influencing factors could be, e.g., unclear language, directive counseling, overload of information, and an immediate delivery. There is limited familiarity with shared decision making although it is the preferred model.
Conclusion: This study gained insight into preferred content, organization, and decision making of prenatal counseling at the limits of viability and their influencing factors from a professionals' perspective. What is Known: • Heterogeneity in prenatal counseling at the limits of viability exists • Differences between preferred counseling and actual practice also exists What is New: • Insight into preferred content, organization, and decision making of prenatal periviability counseling and its influencing factors from a professionals' perspective. Results should be taken into account when performing counseling. • Particularly the understanding of true shared decision making needs to be improved. Furthermore, implementation of shared decision making in daily practice needs more attention.
Keywords: Decision making; Extreme prematurity; Limits of viability; Prenatal counseling.
Conflict of interest statement
Funding source
Fonds Nuts Ohra provided funding for this study.
Financial disclosure
All authors have indicated that they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.
Conflict of interest
All authors have indicated that they have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Preferred prenatal counselling at the limits of viability: a survey among Dutch perinatal professionals.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Jan 3;18(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1644-6. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018. PMID: 29298669 Free PMC article.
-
Various experiences and preferences of Dutch parents in prenatal counseling in extreme prematurity.Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Dec;101(12):2179-2185. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.07.003. Epub 2018 Jul 4. Patient Educ Couns. 2018. PMID: 30029812
-
Prenatal counseling in extreme prematurity - Insight into preferences from experienced parents.Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Aug;102(8):1541-1549. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.03.016. Epub 2019 Mar 23. Patient Educ Couns. 2019. PMID: 30948203
-
Limits of viability: dilemmas, decisions, and decision makers.Am J Perinatol. 2001 May;18(3):117-28. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-14530. Am J Perinatol. 2001. PMID: 11414521 Review.
-
An evidence-based overview of prenatal consultation with a focus on infants born at the limits of viability.Pediatrics. 2010 Apr;125(4):e931-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-1473. Epub 2010 Mar 1. Pediatrics. 2010. PMID: 20194275 Review.
Cited by
-
"It feels like you have to choose one or the other": a qualitative analysis of obstetrician focus groups on periviability counseling.J Perinat Med. 2024 Jun 18;52(7):696-705. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2023-0322. Print 2024 Sep 25. J Perinat Med. 2024. PMID: 38884418
-
Decision-making in imminent extreme premature births: perceived shared decision-making, parental decisional conflict and decision regret.J Perinatol. 2021 Sep;41(9):2201-2207. doi: 10.1038/s41372-021-01159-7. Epub 2021 Jul 20. J Perinatol. 2021. PMID: 34285357
-
Differences in the attitudes towards resuscitation of extremely premature infants between neonatologists and obstetricians: a survey study in China.Front Pediatr. 2023 Dec 13;11:1308770. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1308770. eCollection 2023. Front Pediatr. 2023. PMID: 38152648 Free PMC article.
-
The Edge of Perinatal Viability: Understanding the Dutch Position.Front Pediatr. 2021 Feb 1;9:634290. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.634290. eCollection 2021. Front Pediatr. 2021. PMID: 33598441 Free PMC article.
-
Joint periviability counseling between neonatology and obstetrics is a rare occurrence.J Perinatol. 2020 Dec;40(12):1789-1796. doi: 10.1038/s41372-020-00796-8. Epub 2020 Aug 28. J Perinatol. 2020. PMID: 32859941
References
-
- Caeymaex L, Jousselme C, Vasilescu C, Danan C, Falissard B, Bourrat MM, Garel M, Speranza M. Perceived role in end-of-life decision making in the NICU affects long-term parental grief response. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2013;98(1):F26–F31. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2011-301548. - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical