Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Aug;176(8):1107-1119.
doi: 10.1007/s00431-017-2952-6. Epub 2017 Jul 7.

Professionals' preferences in prenatal counseling at the limits of viability: a nationwide qualitative Dutch study

Affiliations

Professionals' preferences in prenatal counseling at the limits of viability: a nationwide qualitative Dutch study

Rosa Geurtzen et al. Eur J Pediatr. 2017 Aug.

Abstract

Prenatal counseling practices at the limits of viability do vary, and constructing a counseling framework based on guidelines, professional and parental preferences, might achieve more homogeneity. We aimed to gain insight into professionals' preferences on three domains of counseling, particularly content, organization, and decision making and their influencing factors. A qualitative, nationwide in-depth exploration among Dutch perinatal professionals by semi-structured interviews in focus groups was performed. Regarding content of prenatal counseling, preparing parents on the short-term situation (delivery room care) and revealing their perspectives on "quality of life" were considered important. Parents should be informed on the kind of decision, on the difficulty of individual outcome predictions, on survival and mortality figures, short- and long-term morbidity, and the burden of hospitalization. For organization, the making of and compliance with agreements between professionals may promote joint counseling by neonatologists and obstetricians. Supportive materials were considered useful but only when up-to-date, in addition to the discussion and with opportunity for personalization. Regarding decision making, it is not always clear to parents that a prenatal decision needs to be made and they can participate, influencing factors could be, e.g., unclear language, directive counseling, overload of information, and an immediate delivery. There is limited familiarity with shared decision making although it is the preferred model.

Conclusion: This study gained insight into preferred content, organization, and decision making of prenatal counseling at the limits of viability and their influencing factors from a professionals' perspective. What is Known: • Heterogeneity in prenatal counseling at the limits of viability exists • Differences between preferred counseling and actual practice also exists What is New: • Insight into preferred content, organization, and decision making of prenatal periviability counseling and its influencing factors from a professionals' perspective. Results should be taken into account when performing counseling. • Particularly the understanding of true shared decision making needs to be improved. Furthermore, implementation of shared decision making in daily practice needs more attention.

Keywords: Decision making; Extreme prematurity; Limits of viability; Prenatal counseling.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Funding source

Fonds Nuts Ohra provided funding for this study.

Financial disclosure

All authors have indicated that they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.

Conflict of interest

All authors have indicated that they have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Domain: content of prenatal counseling—quotes on several themes associated with preferred content
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Domain: organization of prenatal counseling—quotes on several themes associated with preferred organization of counseling
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Domain: decision making of prenatal counseling—quotes on several themes associated with preferred decision making

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bastek TK, Richardson DK, Zupancic JA, Burns JP. Prenatal consultation practices at the border of viability: a regional survey. Pediatrics. 2005;116(2):407–413. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1427. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Batton DG. Clinical report—antenatal counseling regarding resuscitation at an extremely low gestational age. Pediatrics. 2009;124(1):422–427. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-1060. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boss RD, Hutton N, Sulpar LJ, West AM, Donohue PK. Values parents apply to decision-making regarding delivery room resuscitation for high-risk newborns. Pediatrics. 2008;122(3):583–589. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-1972. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brunkhorst J, Weiner J, Lantos J. Infants of borderline viability: the ethics of delivery room care. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;19(5):290–295. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2014.08.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Caeymaex L, Jousselme C, Vasilescu C, Danan C, Falissard B, Bourrat MM, Garel M, Speranza M. Perceived role in end-of-life decision making in the NICU affects long-term parental grief response. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2013;98(1):F26–F31. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2011-301548. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources