Revision rates and time to revision following endoscopic sinus surgery: A large database analysis
- PMID: 28688189
- PMCID: PMC6743487
- DOI: 10.1002/lary.26741
Revision rates and time to revision following endoscopic sinus surgery: A large database analysis
Abstract
Objectives/hypothesis: Endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) is performed for patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) that have failed maximal medical therapy. This study seeks to determine the prevalence of revision surgery and factors predicting the need for revision after ESS using a large statewide surgery database.
Study design: Large retrospective cohort study using the State Ambulatory Surgery Database for the state of California between 2005 and 2011.
Methods: We identified over 61,000 patients with CRS who underwent ESS, determined by Current Procedural Terminology code. We identified which patients underwent a repeat surgery, and performed multivariable modeling to determine which factors (nasal polyps, age, gender, insurance, hospital setting, ethnicity) predicted the need for revision. Adjusted odds ratios (AOR) and 95% confidence intervals are presented.
Results: Of 61,339 patients who underwent ESS, 4,078 (6.65%) returned for revision ESS during the time period investigated. In a multivariable logistic regression model, positive predictors of revision were a diagnosis of nasal polyps (AOR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.11-1.29, P < .001) and female gender (AOR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.11-1.29, P < .001); public insurance was marginally predictive of increased reoperation (AOR: 1.10, 95% CI: 1.00-1.21, P = .048). Patients of Hispanic ethnicity were less likely to have revision surgery (AOR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.77-0.97, P = .011). Age, income, and hospital setting were not significant predictors.
Conclusions: A minority of patients with CRS who undergo ESS will have a revision surgery. This likelihood is increased in female patients and those with nasal polyps, and decreased in patients of Hispanic ethnicity, even when controlling for income, insurance, and hospital setting.
Level of evidence: 4. Laryngoscope, 128:31-36, 2018.
Keywords: Endoscopic sinus surgery; chronic rhinosinusitis; nasal polyps; revision.
© 2017 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
Potential Conflicts of Interest: None
Figures
References
-
- DeConde AS, Soler ZM. Chronic rhinosinusitis: Epidemiology and burden of disease. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2016;30(2):134–9. - PubMed
-
- Van Oene CM, van Reij EJ, Sprangers MA. Quality-assessment of disease-specific quality of life questionnaires for rhinitis and rhinosinusitis: a systematic review. Allergy. 2007;62(12):1359–71. - PubMed
-
- Bhattacharyya N. Ambulatory sinus and nasal surgery in the United States: demographics and perioperative outcomes. Laryngoscope. 2010;120:635–638. - PubMed
-
- Gliklich RE, Metson R. Effects of sinus surgery on quality of life. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997;117:12–17. - PubMed
-
- Wu AW, Ting JY, Platt MP, Tierney HT, Metson R. Factors affecting time to revision sinus surgery for nasal polyps: a 25-year experience. Laryngoscope. 2014;124:29–33. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
