Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2019 Feb;28(1):77-87.
doi: 10.1017/S2045796017000336. Epub 2017 Jul 10.

Evaluating feasibility and acceptability of a group WHO trans-diagnostic intervention for women with common mental disorders in rural Pakistan: a cluster randomised controlled feasibility trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Evaluating feasibility and acceptability of a group WHO trans-diagnostic intervention for women with common mental disorders in rural Pakistan: a cluster randomised controlled feasibility trial

M N Khan et al. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2019 Feb.

Erratum in

Abstract

Aims: The aim of this feasibility trial was to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the locally adapted Group Problem Management Plus (PM+) intervention for women in the conflict affected settings in Swat, Pakistan.

Methods: This mixed-methods study incorporated a quantitative component consisting of a two arm cluster randomised controlled feasibility trial, and qualitative evaluation of the acceptability of the Group PM+ to a range of stakeholder groups. For the quantitative component, on average from each of the 20 Lady Health Workers (LHWs) catchment area (20 clusters), six women were screened and recruited for the trial with score of >2 on the General Health Questionnaire and score of >16 on the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule. These LHW clusters were randomised on a 1 : 1 allocation ratio using a computer-based software through a simple randomisation method to the Group PM+ intervention or Enhanced Usual Care. The Group PM+ intervention consisted of five weekly sessions of 2 h duration delivered by local non-specialist females under supervision. The primary outcome was individual psychological distress, measured by levels of anxiety and depression on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale at 7th week after baseline. Secondary outcomes include symptoms of depression, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), general psychological profile, levels of functioning and generalised psychological distress. Intervention acceptability was explored through in-depth interviews.

Results: The results show that lay-helpers with no prior mental health experience can be trained to achieve the desired competency to successfully deliver the intervention in community settings under supervision. There was a good intervention uptake, with Group PM+ considered useful by participants, their families and lay-helpers. The outcome evaluation, which was not based on a large enough study to identify statistically significant results, indicated statistically significant improvements in depression, anxiety, general psychological profile and functioning. The PTSD symptoms and depressive disorder scores showed a trend in favour of the intervention.

Conclusion: This trial showed robust acceptance in the local settings with delivery by non-specialists under supervision by local trained females. The trial paves the way for further adaptation and exploration of the outcomes through larger-scale implementation and definitive randomised controlled trials in the local settings.

Keywords: Depression; group therapy; other psychosocial techniques/treatments; randomised controlled trials; women.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Consort flow diagram of the feasibility trial.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ahmer S, Faruqui RA, Aijaz A (2007). Psychiatric rating scales in Urdu: a systematic review. BMC Psychiatry 7, 1. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Allden K, Poole C, Chantavanich S, Ohmar K, Aung NN, Mollica RF (1996). Burmese political dissidents in Thailand: trauma and survival among young adults in exile. American Journal of Public Health 86, 1561–1569. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andrews G, Kemp A, Sunderland M, Von Korff M, Ustun TB (2009). Normative data for the 12 item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0. PLoS ONE 4, e8343. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Applied Mental Health Research Group (2013). Design, Implementation, Monitoring, and Evaluation of Mental Health and Psychosocial Assistance Programs for Trauma Survivors in Low Resource Countries; A User's Manual for Researchers and Program Implementers. John Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health: Baltimore, MA.
    1. Ashworth M, Shepherd M, Christey J, Matthews V, Wright K, Parmentier H, Robinson S, Godfrey E (2004). A client-generated psychometric instrument: the development of ‘PSYCHLOPS’. Counselling and Psychotheraphy Research 4, 27–31.

Publication types

MeSH terms