Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2017 Oct;147(1):158-166.
doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.07.002. Epub 2017 Jul 6.

Is hormonal therapy effective in advanced endometrial cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Is hormonal therapy effective in advanced endometrial cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Josee-Lyne Ethier et al. Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Hormonal therapy (HT) is used commonly in the treatment of advanced endometrial cancer (EC). However, a 2010 Cochrane Review did not show a survival benefit for HT. Here, we quantify its effects and explore the influence of clinico-pathologic factors and hormone receptor (HR) status on overall response rates (ORR).

Methods: A systematic search of electronic databases identified publications of HT in advanced EC. Data from individual studies reporting ORR, median progression-free (PFS) or overall survival (OS) were weighted by individual study sample size and pooled in a meta-analysis. Outcomes of estrogen (ER) and progesterone receptor (PgR) subgroups were collected. Studies of first- and second-line HT were analyzed independently. Mixed studies were included if subgroup data based on previous HT exposure were provided. Meta-regression was performed to evaluate the influence of clinico-pathologic factors on outcomes.

Results: Thirty-nine studies were included, with seven providing subgroup data based on HR status. First-line HT was associated with a mean ORR of 21.6% and clinical benefit rate (CBR) of 36.7%. Median PFS and OS were 2.8 and 10.2months respectively. ORR was 20.4% in clinical trials and 25.3% in observational studies. Magnitude of ORR was lower in older age, adenosquamous histology and high grade. ORR was higher in ER+ (26.5%) and PgR+ (35.5%) disease, and lower in ER- (9.2%) or PgR- (12.1%) tumors. Second-line ORR was 18.5%. CBR was 35.8%, but was significantly associated with timing of stable disease assessments in first- and second-line. Meta-regression performed in mixed and second-line studies showed an association between previous HT and greater ORR (β 0.561; p=0.024), suggesting potential confounding by indication (re-treatment of good responders to first-line HT).

Conclusion: HT is associated with modest ORR in advanced EC, and is greatest in HR+ tumors. Response rates in second-line are likely dependent on response to previous HT.

Keywords: Endometrial cancer; Estrogen receptor; Hormone therapy; Progesterone receptor; Response rate; Survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources