Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Mar;36(1):19-24.

Integrated care of muscular dystrophies in Italy. Part 1. Pharmacological treatment and rehabilitative interventions

Affiliations

Integrated care of muscular dystrophies in Italy. Part 1. Pharmacological treatment and rehabilitative interventions

Luisa Politano et al. Acta Myol. 2017 Mar.

Erratum in

  • ERRATA.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] Acta Myol. 2017 Sep 1;36(3):182. eCollection 2017 Sep. Acta Myol. 2017. PMID: 29774308 Free PMC article.

Abstract

This paper describes the pharmacological therapies and rehabilitative interventions received by 502 patients with Muscular Dystrophies, evaluated in relation to patient's socio-demographic and clinical variables, and geographical areas. Data were collected by the MD-Socio-Demographic and Clinical Schedule (MD-SC-CS) and by the Family Problems Questionnaire (FPQ). The most part of the enrolled patients were in drug treatment. The number of the medications increased in relation to patient's age, disability degree and duration of illness and was higher among patients with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD) compared with Becker (BMD) or Limb-Girdle Muscular Dystrophies (LGMD). Steroids (deflazacort or prednisone) were the drug most frequently used, followed by cardiologic and bone metabolism drugs. In general, patients using steroids were younger and had a shorter duration of illness; patients using cardiac drugs and dietary supplements were older and had a longer duration of illness. Rehabilitative interventions were provided to about 70% (351/502) of patients, mainly DMD. Of these, physiotherapy was the more frequent treatment (96.6%) and was prevalently performed in rehabilitative centres (about 70% of patients) and at home in only 30%. Hydrokinetic-therapy was practiced by 6.8% of patients. Respiratory rehabilitation was provided to 47.0% of patients (165/351) and assisted mechanical ventilaventilation to 13.1% (46). The amount of rehabilitative interventions increased in relation to the patient's age, level of disability and duration of illness. Compared to Central and Northern Italy, in Southern Italy there was a higher attention to cardiological impairment as shown by a higher number of patients receiving heart drugs. No statistically significant differences concerning the possibility to have access to rehabilitative interventions were noted among the three geographical areas. However, patient living in Southern Italy tend to receive rehabilitation more often at home.

Keywords: integrated care; muscular dystrophies; pharmacological treatment; rehabilitative intervention.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Emery AEH. The muscular dystrophies. Lancet. 2002;359:687–695. - PubMed
    1. Emery A. Heritability of common neuromuscular diseases. Neuromuscul Disord. 2010;20:476–476. - PubMed
    1. Monaco A, Neve R, Colletti-Feener C, et al. Isolation of candidate cDNAs for portions of the Duchenne muscular dystrophy gene. Nature. 1986;323:646–650. - PubMed
    1. Hoffman E, Brown R, Kunkel L. Dystrophin: the protein product of the Duchene muscular dystrophy locus. 1987. Biotechnology. 1992;24:457–466. - PubMed
    1. Rahimov F, Kunkel LM. The cell biology of disease: cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying muscular dystrophy. J Cell Biol. 2013;201:499–510. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms