Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Jun 16:6:926.
doi: 10.12688/f1000research.10703.1. eCollection 2017.

Dietary assessment methods in epidemiological research: current state of the art and future prospects

Affiliations
Review

Dietary assessment methods in epidemiological research: current state of the art and future prospects

Androniki Naska et al. F1000Res. .

Abstract

Self-reported dietary intake is assessed by methods of real-time recording (food diaries and the duplicate portion method) and methods of recall (dietary histories, food frequency questionnaires, and 24-hour dietary recalls). Being less labor intensive, recall methods are more frequently employed in nutritional epidemiological investigations. However, sources of error, which include the participants' inability to fully and accurately recall their intakes as well as limitations inherent in the food composition databases applied to convert the reported food consumption to energy and nutrient intakes, may limit the validity of the generated information. The use of dietary biomarkers is often recommended to overcome such errors and better capture intra-individual variability in intake; nevertheless, it has its own challenges. To address measurement error associated with dietary questionnaires, large epidemiological investigations often integrate sub-studies for the validation and calibration of the questionnaires and/or administer a combination of different assessment methods (e.g. administration of different questionnaires and assessment of biomarker levels). Recent advances in the omics field could enrich the list of reliable nutrition biomarkers, whereas new approaches employing web-based and smart phone applications could reduce respondent burden and, possibly, reporting bias. Novel technologies are increasingly integrated with traditional methods, but some sources of error still remain. In the analyses, food and nutrient intakes always need to be adjusted for total daily energy intake to account for errors related to reporting.

Keywords: dietary intake assessment; dietary questionnaire; nutritional epidemiological investigation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.No competing interests were disclosed.No competing interests were disclosed.Competing interests: Dr. Allison discloses that he has published on this topic.

References

    1. Hu FB: Dietary pattern analysis: a new direction in nutritional epidemiology. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2002;13(1):3–9. 10.1097/00041433-200202000-00002 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Knoops KT, de Groot LC, Kromhout D, et al. : Mediterranean diet, lifestyle factors, and 10-year mortality in elderly European men and women: the HALE project. JAMA. 2004;292(12):1433–9. 10.1001/jama.292.12.1433 - DOI - PubMed
    2. F1000 Recommendation

    1. Freedman LS, Schatzkin A, Midthune D, et al. : Dealing with dietary measurement error in nutritional cohort studies. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103(14):1086–92. 10.1093/jnci/djr189 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shim JS, Oh K, Kim HC, et al. : Dietary assessment methods in epidemiologic studies. Epidemiol Health. 2014;36:e2014009. 10.4178/epih/e2014009 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    2. F1000 Recommendation

    1. Walter Willett: Nutritional Epidemiology. Third Edition. New York: Oxford University Press;2013; 40 Reference Source

LinkOut - more resources