Automated morphological analysis of clinical language samples
- PMID: 28691122
- PMCID: PMC5499995
Automated morphological analysis of clinical language samples
Abstract
Quantitative analysis of clinical language samples is a powerful tool for assessing and screening developmental language impairments, but requires extensive manual transcription, annotation, and calculation, resulting in error-prone results and clinical underutilization. We describe a system that performs automated morphological analysis needed to calculate statistics such as the mean length of utterance in morphemes (MLUM), so that these statistics can be computed directly from orthographic transcripts. Estimates of MLUM computed by this system are closely comparable to those produced by manual annotation. Our system can be used in conjunction with other automated annotation techniques, such as maze detection. This work represents an important first step towards increased automation of language sample analysis, and towards attendant benefits of automation, including clinical greater utilization and reduced variability in care delivery.
References
-
- Allauzen Cyril, Riley Michael, Schalkwyk Johan, Skut Wojciech, Mohri Mehryar. OpenFst: A general and efficient weighted finite-state transducer library. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Implementation and Application of Automata; 2007. pp. 11–23.
-
- Aram Dorothy M, Morris Robin, Hall Nancy E. Clinical and research congruence in identifying children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research. 1993;36(3):580–591. - PubMed
-
- Brown Roger. A first language: The early stages. Harvard University Press; Cambridge: 1973.
-
- Collins Michael. Discriminative training methods for hidden Markov models: Theory and experiments with perceptron algorithms. EMNLP. 2002:1–8.
-
- Conti-Ramsden Gina, Durkin Kevin. Postschool educational and employment experiences of young people with specific language impairment. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools. 2012;43(4):507–520. - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources