Simplifying Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System classification of mammograms with pure suspicious calcifications
- PMID: 28691862
- PMCID: PMC5956567
- DOI: 10.1177/0969141317715281
Simplifying Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System classification of mammograms with pure suspicious calcifications
Abstract
Objectives To investigate the risk of malignancy following stereotactic breast biopsy of calcifications classified as Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 3, 4, and 5. Methods The study included women with pure calcifications (not associated with masses or architectural distortions) who underwent stereotactic breast biopsy at the Dutch Cancer Institute between January 2011 and October 2013. Suspicious calcifications (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System 3, 4, or 5) detected on mammography were biopsied. All lesions were assessed by breast radiologists and classified according to the BI-RADS lexicon. Results Overall, 473 patients underwent 497 stereotactic breast biopsies. Sixty-six percent (326/497) of calcifications were classified B4, 30% (148/497) B3, and 4% (23/497) B5. Of the 226 (45%) malignant lesions, there were 182 pure ductal carcinoma in situ, 22 mixed ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive carcinomas (ductal or lobular), 21 pure invasive carcinomas, and one angiosarcoma. Malignancy was found in 32% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.24 to 0.39) of B3, 49% (95% CI 0.43 to 0.54) of B4, and 83% (95% CI 0.61 to 0.95) of B5 calcifications. Conclusions Considering the high predictive value for malignancy in B3 calcifications, we propose that these lesions should be classified as suspicious (B4), especially in a screening setting.
Keywords: BI-RADS; breast cancer; calcifications; mammography; screening.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Suspicious breast calcifications undergoing stereotactic biopsy in women ages 70 and over: Breast cancer incidence by BI-RADS descriptors.Eur Radiol. 2017 Jun;27(6):2275-2281. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4617-7. Epub 2016 Oct 17. Eur Radiol. 2017. PMID: 27752832
-
Surgical biopsy is still necessary for BI-RADS 4 calcifications found on digital mammography that are technically too faint for stereotactic core biopsy.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015 Dec;154(3):557-61. doi: 10.1007/s10549-015-3640-8. Epub 2015 Nov 20. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015. PMID: 26589316
-
Stereotactic and sonographic large-core biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: results of the Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group V study.Acad Radiol. 2004 Mar;11(3):293-308. doi: 10.1016/s1076-6332(03)00510-5. Acad Radiol. 2004. PMID: 15035520 Clinical Trial.
-
Mammographic features and correlation with biopsy findings using 11-gauge stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (SVABB).Ann Oncol. 2004 Mar;15(3):450-4. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdh088. Ann Oncol. 2004. PMID: 14998847 Review.
-
Stereotactic 14 gauge core-biopsy of the breast: results from 101 patients.Aust N Z J Surg. 1996 Sep;66(9):585-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1996.tb00824.x. Aust N Z J Surg. 1996. PMID: 8859155 Review.
Cited by
-
Microcalcifications Drive Breast Cancer Occurrence and Development by Macrophage-Mediated Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transition.Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Nov 11;20(22):5633. doi: 10.3390/ijms20225633. Int J Mol Sci. 2019. PMID: 31718020 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Latest world cancer statistics Global cancer burden rises to 14.1 million new cases in 2012: marked increase in breast cancers must be addressed. World Health Organization, www.iarc.fr/en/media-centre/pr/2013/pdfs/pr223_E.pdf (2013, accessed 10 October 2016).
-
- Euhus D, Di Carlo PA, Khouri NF. Breast cancer screening. Surg Clin North Am 2015; 95: 991–1011. - PubMed
-
- Coleman MP, Quaresma M, Berrino F, et al. Cancer survival in five continents: a worldwide population-based study (CONCORD). Lancet Oncol 2008; 9: 730–56. - PubMed
-
- Humphrey LL, Helfand M, Chan BK, et al. Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2002; 137: 347–360. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical