Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jul 10;11(7):e0005648.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005648. eCollection 2017 Jul.

Congenital toxoplasmosis in Austria: Prenatal screening for prevention is cost-saving

Affiliations

Congenital toxoplasmosis in Austria: Prenatal screening for prevention is cost-saving

Andrea-Romana Prusa et al. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. .

Abstract

Background: Primary infection of Toxoplasma gondii during pregnancy can be transmitted to the unborn child and may have serious consequences, including retinochoroiditis, hydrocephaly, cerebral calcifications, encephalitis, splenomegaly, hearing loss, blindness, and death. Austria, a country with moderate seroprevalence, instituted mandatory prenatal screening for toxoplasma infection to minimize the effects of congenital transmission. This work compares the societal costs of congenital toxoplasmosis under the Austrian national prenatal screening program with the societal costs that would have occurred in a No-Screening scenario.

Methodology/principal findings: We retrospectively investigated data from the Austrian Toxoplasmosis Register for birth cohorts from 1992 to 2008, including pediatric long-term follow-up until May 2013. We constructed a decision-analytic model to compare lifetime societal costs of prenatal screening with lifetime societal costs estimated in a No-Screening scenario. We included costs of treatment, lifetime care, accommodation of injuries, loss of life, and lost earnings that would have occurred in a No-Screening scenario and compared them with the actual costs of screening, treatment, lifetime care, accommodation, loss of life, and lost earnings. We replicated that analysis excluding loss of life and lost earnings to estimate the budgetary impact alone. Our model calculated total lifetime costs of €103 per birth under prenatal screening as carried out in Austria, saving €323 per birth compared with No-Screening. Without screening and treatment, lifetime societal costs for all affected children would have been €35 million per year; the implementation costs of the Austrian program are less than €2 million per year. Calculating only the budgetary impact, the national program was still cost-saving by more than €15 million per year and saved €258 million in 17 years.

Conclusions/significance: Cost savings under a national program of prenatal screening for toxoplasma infection and treatment are outstanding. Our results are of relevance for health care providers by supplying economic data based on a unique national dataset including long-term follow-up of affected infants.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Decision tree before calculation.
Tree with societal cost formulas at terminal nodes.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Decision tree after calculation.
Tree showing results for societal costs.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Decision tree for budget impact.
Tree showing results, budget impact.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Incremental tornado sensitivity analysis, societal perspective.
Fig 5
Fig 5. One-way sensitivity analysis on value of statistical life.
Fig 6
Fig 6. Incremental tornado sensitivity analysis (budget impact).

References

    1. Remington JS, McLeod R, Thulliez P, Desmonts G (2010) Toxoplasmosis In: Remington JS, Klein G, Wilson C, Baker C, editors. Infectious Disease of the Fetus and Newborn Infant. 6th ed Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; pp. 947–1091.
    1. Isaac-Renton J, Bowie WR, King A, Irwin GS, Ong CS, et al. (1998) Detection of Toxoplasma gondii oocysts in drinking water. Appl Environ Microbiol 64: 2278–2280. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boyer KM, Holfels E, Roizen N, Swisher C, Mack D, et al. (2005) Risk factors for Toxoplasma gondii infection in mothers of infants with congenital toxoplasmosis: Implications for prenatal management and screening. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 192: 564–571. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.07.031 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boyer K, Hill D, Mui E, Wroblewski K, Karrison T, et al. (2011) Unrecognized ingestion of Toxoplasma gondii oocysts leads to congenital toxoplasmosis and causes epidemics in North America. Clin Infect Dis 53: 1081–1089. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir667 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vaudaux JD, Muccioli C, James ER, Silveira C, Magargal SL, et al. (2010) Identification of an atypical strain of Toxoplasma gondii as the cause of a waterborne outbreak of toxoplasmosis in Santa Isabel do Ivai, Brazil. Journal of Infectious Diseases 202: 1226–1233. doi: 10.1086/656397 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources