Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2017 Jul 11;18(1):4.
doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4548-5.

Impact of large-scale distribution and subsequent use of free nicotine patches on primary care physician interaction

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Impact of large-scale distribution and subsequent use of free nicotine patches on primary care physician interaction

Vladyslav Kushnir et al. BMC Public Health. .

Erratum in

  • Erratum to: BMC Public Health, Vol. 18.
    [No authors listed] [No authors listed] BMC Public Health. 2017 Sep 22;17(1):736. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4709-6. BMC Public Health. 2017. PMID: 28938882 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Abstract

Background: Large-scale distribution efforts of free nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) have been documented to be cost-effective interventions for increasing smoking quit rates. However, despite nearly a dozen studies evaluating their effectiveness, none have examined whether free NRT provision promotes further primary care help-seeking and the impact that it may have on cessation efforts.

Methods: In the context of a randomized controlled trial, a secondary analysis was conducted on 1000 adult regular smokers randomized to be mailed a 5-week supply of nicotine patches or to a no intervention control group. Recipients and users of free nicotine patches at an 8 week follow-up were successfully case matched to controls based on age, gender, baseline level of nicotine dependence and intent to quit (n = 201 per group). Differences in physician interaction between the two groups were evaluated at both 8 week and 6 month follow-ups. The impact of physician interaction on self-reported smoking abstinence at each follow-up was also examined.

Results: Although no differences in physician interaction were noted between groups at the 8 week follow-up, at the 6 month follow-up, nicotine patch users reported greater frequency of discussing smoking with their physician (43.9%), as compared to the control group (30.3%) (p = 0.011). Across both groups, over 90% of those that discussed smoking with a physician were encouraged to quit and approximately 70% were provided with additional support. Separate ANOVAs revealed no significant impact of physician interaction on cessation (p > 0.05), regardless of group or follow-up period, however, at the 6 month follow-up, nicotine patch users who discussed cessation with a physician had made serious quit attempts at significantly greater rates (72.6%), compared to controls (49.1%) (p = 0.007).

Conclusions: Irrespective of group, the majority of smokers in the present study did not discuss cessation with their physician. Recipients and users of nicotine patches however, were more likely to discuss smoking with their physician, suggesting that the provision of free NRT particularly to those who are likely to use it may facilitate opportunities for benefits beyond the direct pharmacological effects of the medication.

Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov , NCT01429129 . Registered: 2 September 2011.

Keywords: Health professionals; Nicotine replacement therapy; Primary care physicians; Smoking cessation; Tobacco.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This research was approved by the Ethics Review Board at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (No. 192/2012). All participants provided verbal, over-the-phone consent to participate prior to the start of the baseline interview.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Physician assistance offered between 8 week and 6 month follow-ups. Note: NP, nicotine patch

References

    1. Davis RM. Uniting physicians against smoking: the need for a coordinated national strategy. JAMA. 1988;259:2900–2901. doi: 10.1001/jama.1988.03720190068035. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Leatherdale ST, Shields M. Smoking cessation: intentions, attempts and techniques. Health Rep. 2009;20:31–39. - PubMed
    1. Stead LF, Bergson G, Lancaster T. Physician advice for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008:CD000165. - PubMed
    1. Aveyard P, Begh R, Parsons A, West R. Brief opportunistic smoking cessation interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare advice to quit and offer of assistance. Addiction. 2012;107:1066–1073. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03770.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fiore M, Jaen C, Baker T, Bailey W, Benowitz N, Curry S, Dorfman S, Froelicher E. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2008. Treating tobacco use and dependence: 2008 update. Clinical practice guidelines.

Publication types

Associated data