Association of delay of urgent or emergency surgery with mortality and use of health care resources: a propensity score-matched observational cohort study
- PMID: 28694308
- PMCID: PMC5505757
- DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.160576
Association of delay of urgent or emergency surgery with mortality and use of health care resources: a propensity score-matched observational cohort study
Abstract
Background: Delay of surgery for hip fracture is associated with increased risk of morbidity and mortality, but the effects of surgical delays on mortality and resource use in the context of other emergency surgeries is poorly described. Our objective was to measure the independent association between delay of emergency surgery and in-hospital mortality, length of stay and costs.
Methods: We identified all adult patients who underwent emergency noncardiac surgery between January 2012 and October 2014 at a single tertiary care centre. Delay of surgery was defined as the time from surgical booking to operating room entry exceeding institutionally defined acceptable wait times, based on a standardized 5-level priority system that accounted for surgery type and indication. Patients with delayed surgery were matched to those without delay using propensity scores derived from variables that accounted for details of admission and the hospital stay, patient characteristics, physiologic instability, and surgical urgency and risk.
Results: Of 15 160 patients, 2820 (18.6%) experienced a delay. The mortality rates were 4.9% (138/2820) for those with delay and 3.2% (391/12 340) for those without delay (odds ratio [OR] 1.59, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.30-1.93). Within the propensity-matched cohort, delay was significantly associated with mortality (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.18-2.06), increased length of stay (incident rate ratio 1.07, 95% CI 1.01-1.11) and higher total costs (incident rate ratio 1.06, 95% CI 1.01-1.11).
Interpretation: Delayed operating room access for emergency surgery was associated with increased risk of inhospital mortality, longer length of stay and higher costs. System issues appeared to underlie most delays and must be addressed to improve the outcomes of emergency surgery.
© 2017 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Figures


Comment in
-
Delivering timely surgery in Canadian hospitals.CMAJ. 2017 Jul 10;189(27):E903-E904. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.170172. CMAJ. 2017. PMID: 28694307 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Urgent care access: finding solutions that match causation.CMAJ. 2018 Jan 15;190(2):E56. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.733536. CMAJ. 2018. PMID: 29335266 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Haider AH, Obirieze A, Velopulos CG, et al. Incremental cost of emergency versus elective surgery. Ann Surg 2015;262:260–6. - PubMed
-
- Fleisher LA, Beckman JA, Brown KA, et al. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery); American Society of Echocardiography; American Society of Nuclear Cardiology; Heart Rhythm Society; Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists; Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions; Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology; Society for Vascular Surgery. ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and care for noncardiac surgery: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery). Anesth Analg 2008;106:685–712. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources