Did the 2011 AAP recommendations on youth HIV testing change practice? Trends from a large urban adolescent program
- PMID: 28694707
- PMCID: PMC5490436
- DOI: 10.2147/HIV.S128558
Did the 2011 AAP recommendations on youth HIV testing change practice? Trends from a large urban adolescent program
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine whether there is adherence to the October 2011 American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommendations for HIV screening in a large urban adolescent program with availability of a publicly funded program providing free, confidential, sexually transmitted infection (STI) and HIV counseling and testing (then rapid or third generation HIV testing), nested in the same adolescent clinic.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of HIV screening trends among 13- to 24-year-old patients tested for HIV during periods of January 2010 to June 2011 (18 months pre-AAP recommendations period) and July 2011 to December 2012 (18-month period, which included 15 months after the AAP recommendations).
Results: During the period of January 2010 to June 2011, there were 22 tests/1,000 medical visits (N = 824 of 37,520 medical visits), and during the period of July 2011 to December 2012, there were 27 tests/1,000 medical visits (N = 1,068 of 38,763 medical visits) (p < 0.0001, odds ratio [OR] 1.26). The number of 13- to 18-year-old patients screened in the pre-AAP period was 150, compared to 297 in the second 18-month period (X 2 = 43.3, df = 1, p < 0.0001). A summative risk profile score of 0-9 was created in the form of a continuous variable, with a risk score of 0 for those with no risk factor identified and 1 point for each risk behavior identified. The proportion of HIV test clients with zero-specified risk (a risk score of "0") increased from 2010 to 2012.
Conclusion: Release of the 2011 AAP HIV testing guidelines was associated with a modest increase in HIV screening and a shift toward testing younger people and away from risk-based screening.
Keywords: 2011 AAP HIV recommendations; HIV risk factors; HIV screening; adolescents; risk-based HIV screening.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
Figures
References
-
- Committee on Pediatric AIDS. Emmanuel PJ, Martinez J. Adolescents and HIV infection: the pediatrician’s role in promoting routine testing. Pediatrics. 2011;128(5):1023–1029. - PubMed
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention HIV Surveillance in Adolescents and Young Adults. 2011. [Accessed January 12, 2016]. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/statistics_surveillance_Adolescents.pdf.
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [webpage on the Internet] [Accessed February 12, 2016];Estimated HIV Incidence in the United States, 2007–2010. HIV Surveillance Supplemental Report 2012. 2012 17(4) Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/surveillance/resources/reports/#supplemental.
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [webpage on the Internet] [Accessed February 12, 2016];Monitoring Selected National HIV Prevention and Care Objectives by Using HIV Surveillance Data – United States and 6 Dependent Areas – 2013 HIV Surveillance Supplemental Report 2015. 2015 20(2) Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/library/reports/surveillance/
-
- Lyles RH, Munoz A, Yamashita TE, et al. Natural history of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 viremia after seroconversion and proximal to AIDS in a large cohort of homosexual men. Multicenter AIDS cohort study. J Infect Dis. 2000;181(3):872–880. - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous
