Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jun 20;3(2):137-140.
doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2017.05.003. eCollection 2017 Jun.

Infection burden in total hip and knee arthroplasties: an international registry-based perspective

Affiliations

Infection burden in total hip and knee arthroplasties: an international registry-based perspective

Bryan D Springer et al. Arthroplast Today. .

Abstract

Background: Infection remains a leading cause of failure of hip and knee replacements. Infection burden is the ratio of implants revised for infection to the total number of arthroplasties in a specific period, measuring the steady state of infection in a registry. We hypothesized infection burden would be similar among arthroplasty registries.

Methods: We evaluated publicly reported data from 6 arthroplasty registries (Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry [AOANJRR], New Zealand Joint Registry, Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register, Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register, National Joint Registry of England, Wales, Northern Ireland, and the Isle of Man, and the American Joint Replacement Registry) for revisions performed with an infection diagnosis over the last 6 years.

Results: The 2015 hip infection burden varied between registries from 0.76% (AOANJRR) to 1.24% (Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register), and the unweighted overall average for hip infection burden was 0.97%. In 2012, 2013, and 2014, average hip infection burden held steady at 0.87%, 0.93%, and 0.94%, respectively, higher than the preceding 2 years. The 2015 knee infection burden varied from 0.88% (AOANJRR) to 1.28% (Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register), and the unweighted average was 1.03%. In 2012, 2013, and 2014, knee infection burden was 1.04%, 1.11%, and 1.02%, respectively. These numbers were also higher than the preceding 2 years.

Conclusions: Infection burden may be one measure of the overall success in registry populations as well as monitoring the steady state of infection worldwide. Despite global efforts to reduce postoperative infection, infection burden has actually increased in the selected registries over time.

Keywords: Infection burden; Joint replacement registry; Revision; Revision burden; Total joint arthroplasty.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ranawat C.S., Flynn W.F., Jr., Saddler S., Hansraj K.K., Maynard M.J. Long-term results of the total condylar knee arthroplasty: a 15-year survivorship study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;286:94. - PubMed
    1. Berry D.J., Harmsen W.S., Cabanela M.E., Morrey B.F. Twenty-five-year survivorship of two thousand consecutive primary Charnley total hip replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84(2):171. - PubMed
    1. Verra W., Kernkamp W., van Hilten J. Patient satisfaction and quality of life at least 10 years after total hip or knee arthroplasty. Int J Orthop. 2016;2(2):05.
    1. Kurtz S., Ong K., Lau E., Mowat F., Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(4):780. - PubMed
    1. Bozic K.J., Kurtz S.M., Lau E. The epidemiology of revision total knee arthroplasty in the United States. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:45. - PMC - PubMed