Evolution of the Reactor Antineutrino Flux and Spectrum at Daya Bay
Affiliations
- 1 Institute of Modern Physics, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai.
- 2 University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706.
- 3 Wright Laboratory and Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520.
- 4 Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973.
- 5 Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei.
- 6 National United University, Miao-Li.
- 7 Nanjing University, Nanjing.
- 8 Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing.
- 9 Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
- 10 Shandong University, Jinan.
- 11 Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing.
- 12 North China Electric Power University, Beijing.
- 13 Shenzhen University, Shenzhen.
- 14 Sun Yat-Sen (Zhongshan) University, Guangzhou.
- 15 Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Moscow Region.
- 16 Siena College, Loudonville, New York 12211.
- 17 Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801.
- 18 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720.
- 19 Department of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai Laboratory for Particle Physics and Cosmology, Shanghai.
- 20 Beijing Normal University, Beijing.
- 21 Department of Nuclear Science and Technology, School of Energy and Power Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an.
- 22 Department of Physics, University of Houston, Houston, Texas 77204.
- 23 China Institute of Atomic Energy, Beijing.
- 24 Center for Neutrino Physics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061.
- 25 University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei.
- 26 Institute of Physics, National Chiao-Tung University, Hsinchu.
- 27 School of Physics, Nankai University, Tianjin.
- 28 Department of Physics, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221.
- 29 Department of Physics, College of Science and Technology, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122.
- 30 Dongguan University of Technology, Dongguan.
- 31 Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720.
- 32 Department of Physics, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong.
- 33 Charles University, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Prague.
- 34 Department of Physics, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois 60616.
- 35 Joseph Henry Laboratories, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544.
- 36 Instituto de Física, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago.
- 37 California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125.
- 38 College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia 23187.
- 39 Department of Physics, Applied Physics, and Astronomy, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York 12180.
- 40 China General Nuclear Power Group, Shenzhen.
- 41 College of Electronic Science and Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha.
- 42 Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011.
- 43 Chongqing University, Chongqing.
- PMID: 28696753
- DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.251801
Evolution of the Reactor Antineutrino Flux and Spectrum at Daya Bay
Authors
Affiliations
- 1 Institute of Modern Physics, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai.
- 2 University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706.
- 3 Wright Laboratory and Department of Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520.
- 4 Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973.
- 5 Department of Physics, National Taiwan University, Taipei.
- 6 National United University, Miao-Li.
- 7 Nanjing University, Nanjing.
- 8 Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing.
- 9 Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
- 10 Shandong University, Jinan.
- 11 Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing.
- 12 North China Electric Power University, Beijing.
- 13 Shenzhen University, Shenzhen.
- 14 Sun Yat-Sen (Zhongshan) University, Guangzhou.
- 15 Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Moscow Region.
- 16 Siena College, Loudonville, New York 12211.
- 17 Department of Physics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801.
- 18 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720.
- 19 Department of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai Laboratory for Particle Physics and Cosmology, Shanghai.
- 20 Beijing Normal University, Beijing.
- 21 Department of Nuclear Science and Technology, School of Energy and Power Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an.
- 22 Department of Physics, University of Houston, Houston, Texas 77204.
- 23 China Institute of Atomic Energy, Beijing.
- 24 Center for Neutrino Physics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061.
- 25 University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei.
- 26 Institute of Physics, National Chiao-Tung University, Hsinchu.
- 27 School of Physics, Nankai University, Tianjin.
- 28 Department of Physics, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221.
- 29 Department of Physics, College of Science and Technology, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122.
- 30 Dongguan University of Technology, Dongguan.
- 31 Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720.
- 32 Department of Physics, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong.
- 33 Charles University, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Prague.
- 34 Department of Physics, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois 60616.
- 35 Joseph Henry Laboratories, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544.
- 36 Instituto de Física, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago.
- 37 California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125.
- 38 College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, Virginia 23187.
- 39 Department of Physics, Applied Physics, and Astronomy, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York 12180.
- 40 China General Nuclear Power Group, Shenzhen.
- 41 College of Electronic Science and Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha.
- 42 Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011.
- 43 Chongqing University, Chongqing.
- PMID: 28696753
- DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.251801
Abstract
The Daya Bay experiment has observed correlations between reactor core fuel evolution and changes in the reactor antineutrino flux and energy spectrum. Four antineutrino detectors in two experimental halls were used to identify 2.2 million inverse beta decays (IBDs) over 1230 days spanning multiple fuel cycles for each of six 2.9 GW_{th} reactor cores at the Daya Bay and Ling Ao nuclear power plants. Using detector data spanning effective ^{239}Pu fission fractions F_{239} from 0.25 to 0.35, Daya Bay measures an average IBD yield σ[over ¯]_{f} of (5.90±0.13)×10^{-43} cm^{2}/fission and a fuel-dependent variation in the IBD yield, dσ_{f}/dF_{239}, of (-1.86±0.18)×10^{-43} cm^{2}/fission. This observation rejects the hypothesis of a constant antineutrino flux as a function of the ^{239}Pu fission fraction at 10 standard deviations. The variation in IBD yield is found to be energy dependent, rejecting the hypothesis of a constant antineutrino energy spectrum at 5.1 standard deviations. While measurements of the evolution in the IBD spectrum show general agreement with predictions from recent reactor models, the measured evolution in total IBD yield disagrees with recent predictions at 3.1σ. This discrepancy indicates that an overall deficit in the measured flux with respect to predictions does not result from equal fractional deficits from the primary fission isotopes ^{235}U, ^{239}Pu, ^{238}U, and ^{241}Pu. Based on measured IBD yield variations, yields of (6.17±0.17) and (4.27±0.26)×10^{-43} cm^{2}/fission have been determined for the two dominant fission parent isotopes ^{235}U and ^{239}Pu. A 7.8% discrepancy between the observed and predicted ^{235}U yields suggests that this isotope may be the primary contributor to the reactor antineutrino anomaly.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous