Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017;9(5):441-455.
doi: 10.1159/000477419. Epub 2017 Jul 12.

Update of Sepsis in the Intensive Care Unit

Affiliations
Review

Update of Sepsis in the Intensive Care Unit

Kelly Roveran Genga et al. J Innate Immun. 2017.

Abstract

Sepsis, the most common cause of admission to an intensive care unit (ICU), has had an increased incidence and prevalence over the last years with a simultaneous decrease in its short-term mortality. Sepsis survivors are more frequently discharged from hospital and often experience long-term outcomes such as late mortality, immune dysfunction, secondary infections, impaired quality of life, and unplanned readmissions. Early recognition and management of sepsis have challenged emergency care and critical care physicians and nurses. New sepsis definitions were produced and the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) 2016 was updated recently. Although hospital readmissions after sepsis are common, associated risk factors and how to manage patients who survive an episode of sepsis still need clarification. The immune dysfunction caused by sepsis/septic shock is complex, persistent, affects inflammatory and anti-inflammatory systems, and might be associated with long-term outcomes of sepsis. Several randomized controlled trials (RCT) that analyzed new (and old) interventions in sepsis/septic shock are discussed in this review in parallel with the SSC 2016 recommendations and other guidelines when relevant. RCTs addressing incidence, treatment, and prevention of important sepsis-associated organ dysfunction such as the acute respiratory distress syndrome, acute kidney injury, and brain dysfunction are highlighted. Finally, we briefly discuss the need for novel targets, predictive biomarkers, and new designs of RCTs in sepsis.

Keywords: Albumin; Early treatment; Renal therapy; Sepsis; Septic shock; Transfusion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
New targets and novel randomized controlled trial (RCT) designs are necessary in sepsis. The increased number of sepsis survivors and subsequent greater proportions and numbers of sepsis-associated long-term outcomes, and a great number of negative RCTs in sepsis emphasize the need for the use of new designs in RCTs (e.g., more and larger phase 2 trials, inclusion of patients at early stages of sepsis, and use of long-term and composite endpoints) and new targets aimed at immune system modulation, resolution of organ dysfunction(s), and/or increased pathogen clearance.

References

    1. Hall MJ, Williams SN, DeFrances CJ, Golosinskiy A. Inpatient care for septicemia or sepsis: a challenge for patients and hospitals. NCHS Data Brief. 2011;62:1–8. - PubMed
    1. Hoyert DL, Xu J. Deaths: preliminary data for 2011. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2012;61:1–51. - PubMed
    1. Navaneelan T, Alam S, Peters PA, Phillips O. Deaths involving sepsis in Canada. Health at a Glance. 2016 http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/82-624-x/2016001/article/14308-eng.htm.
    1. Perner A, Gordon AC, De Backer D, et al. Sepsis: frontiers in diagnosis resuscitation and antibiotic therapy. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42:1958–1969. - PubMed
    1. Chang DW, Tseng CH, Shapiro MF. Rehospitalizations following sepsis: common and costly. Crit Care Med. 2015;43:2085–2093. - PMC - PubMed

Substances