Abortion terminology: views of women seeking abortion in Britain
- PMID: 28698244
- DOI: 10.1136/jfprhc-2016-101631
Abortion terminology: views of women seeking abortion in Britain
Abstract
Background: Controversy exists as to whether 'abortion or 'termination of pregnancy' should be used by health professionals during interactions with women and in published works.
Methods: Self-administered anonymous questionnaires were distributed to women attending 54 abortion clinics in Scotland, England and Wales during a 4-month period in 2015. Responses were coded and analysed using SPSS. Descriptive statistics were generated and responses compared by demographic characteristics. The main outcome measures were the proportion of respondents reporting that they found the terms 'abortion' and 'termination of pregnancy' to be distressing, and women's preferred terminology for referring to induced abortion.
Results: Surveys were completed by 2259 women. The mean age of the respondents was 27(range 13-51) years; 82% identified as white, 51% had children and 36% had previously undergone abortion. Thirty-five percent indicated that they found the word 'abortion' distressing compared with 18% who reported that 'termination of pregnancy' was distressing (p< 0.001). Forty-five percent of respondents expressed a preference for 'termination of pregnancy' and 12% for 'abortion'. Sixteen percent would choose either term. This pattern of results did not vary statistically by age, reproductive history, country of residence, ethnicity or level of deprivation.
Conclusions: Most women seeking abortion did not find the terms 'abortion' or termination of pregnancy' distressing. When given a choice of terms, more women who expressed a preference chose 'termination of pregnancy'. Healthcare professionals should be sensitive to preferences for terminology when communicating with women seeking abortion.
Keywords: abortion; termination of pregnancy; terminology; voluntary interruption of pregnancy.
© Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
Similar articles
-
'Abortion' or 'termination of pregnancy'? Views from abortion care providers in Scotland, UK.BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2018 Apr;44(2):122-127. doi: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2017-101925. Epub 2018 Mar 8. BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2018. PMID: 29921635
-
Randomised preference trial of medical versus surgical termination of pregnancy less than 14 weeks' gestation (TOPS).Health Technol Assess. 2009 Nov;13(53):1-124, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta13530. Health Technol Assess. 2009. PMID: 19906334 Clinical Trial.
-
Impact of the October 1995 pill scare in Grampian.Br J Fam Plann. 1998 Apr;24(1):18-20. Br J Fam Plann. 1998. PMID: 9719702
-
Reasons women give for abortion: a review of the literature.Arch Womens Ment Health. 2009 Dec;12(6):365-78. doi: 10.1007/s00737-009-0084-3. Epub 2009 Jun 11. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2009. PMID: 19517213 Review.
-
Acceptability of medical abortion in early pregnancy.Fam Plann Perspect. 1995 Jul-Aug;27(4):142-8, 185. Fam Plann Perspect. 1995. PMID: 7589354 Review.
Cited by
-
Abortion terminology preferences: a cross-sectional survey of people accessing abortion care.BMC Womens Health. 2023 Jan 19;23(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12905-022-02152-8. BMC Womens Health. 2023. PMID: 36658525 Free PMC article.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources