Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jul 8;18(7):1468.
doi: 10.3390/ijms18071468.

The Chemokine Receptor CXCR6 Evokes Reverse Signaling via the Transmembrane Chemokine CXCL16

Affiliations

The Chemokine Receptor CXCR6 Evokes Reverse Signaling via the Transmembrane Chemokine CXCL16

Vivian Adamski et al. Int J Mol Sci. .

Abstract

Reverse signaling is a signaling mechanism where transmembrane or membrane-bound ligands transduce signals and exert biological effects upon binding of their specific receptors, enabling a bidirectional signaling between ligand and receptor-expressing cells. In this study, we address the question of whether the transmembrane chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 16, CXCL16 is able to transduce reverse signaling and investigate the biological consequences. For this, we used human glioblastoma cell lines and a melanoma cell line as in vitro models to show that stimulation with recombinant C-X-C chemokine receptor 6 (CXCR6) or CXCR6-containing membrane preparations induces intracellular (reverse) signaling. Specificity was verified by RNAi experiments and by transfection with expression vectors for the intact CXCL16 and an intracellularly-truncated form of CXCL16. We showed that reverse signaling via CXCL16 promotes migration in CXCL16-expressing melanoma and glioblastoma cells, but does not affect proliferation or protection from chemically-induced apoptosis. Additionally, fast migrating cells isolated from freshly surgically-resected gliomas show a differential expression pattern for CXCL16 in comparison to slowly-migrating cells, enabling a possible functional role of the reverse signaling of the CXCL16/CXCR6 pair in human brain tumor progression in vivo.

Keywords: brain tumor; cellular communication; chemokine; chemokine receptor; glioma; reverse signaling; tumor cell migration.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Expression of CXCL16 and CXCR6 mRNA and protein in glioblastoma cells and stably transfected LOX melanoma cell clones by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) and immunocytochemistry (ICC). (A) Expression of CXCL16 and CXCR6 was investigated in glioblastoma cell lines A172, LN229, T98G and U251MG (for biological independent results of A172 and T98G, compare also [13]). CXCL16 was detected at moderate to high extends, whereas CXCR6 was undetectable or yielded just background staining; (B) expression of CXCL16 was investigated in clones from natively CXCL16-negative, CXCR6-negative LOX melanoma cells. While the LOX-pcDNA clone was CXCL16 negative, the LOX-CXCL16 clone showed CXCL16 at the mRNA and protein level. A C-terminally truncated version of CXCL16 (in LOX-ΔCXCL16 cells) was also detectable at the mRNA and protein level (for verification of truncation, see [13]); (C) Expression of CXCR6 was investigated in LOX melanoma cell clones. While the LOX-pCMV clone was CXCR6 negative, a LOX-CXCR6 transfected clone yielded positive staining for CXCR6 and a specific signal at about 43 kDa in Western blot experiments. Values of qRT-PCR are shown as ΔCT, meaning that a 3.33 higher ΔCT indicates a 10-fold lower mRNA expression. n = 3 independent experiments; examples shown for immunocytochemistry. Scale bars indicate 20 µm, respectively.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Phosphorylation of the extra cellular-regulated kinases ERK1/2 upon stimulation with recombinant CXCR6 in glioblastoma cells. (A) T98G and U251MG glioblastoma cells were stimulated with 25 ng/mL recombinant (rec) CXCR6 for 10 or 15 min, respectively, and phosphorylation of ERK1/2 was investigated by Western blot; equal loading was ensured by reprobing of the membranes with antibodies for the non-phosphorylated kinase ERK2. Stimulation with recombinant CXCR6 yielded a clear phosphorylation signal for both cell lines; (B) when CXCL16 expression was reduced in T98G and U251MG cells to 30–40% by CXCL16-specific siRNA (siCXCL16) as proven by qRT-PCR and Western or dot blotting, ERK1/2 phosphorylation after 10 minutes of stimulation with recombinant CXCR6 was clearly diminished in comparison to control siRNA transfections. Examples of n = 3 independent experiments.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Phosphorylation of ERK1/2 upon stimulation with recombinant CXCR6 or membrane preparations of CXCR6-expressing and control LOX clones. (A) In LOX-CXCL16 clones, stimulation with 25 ng/mL recombinant (rec) CXCR6 (upper panel), as well as with membranes from CXCR6-expressing LOX cells (CXCR6 membranes, 5 µg/mL membrane preparation, middle panel) induced a robust phosphorylation of ERK1/2, while stimulation with control membranes lacking CXCR6 (pCMV membranes, lower panel) failed to activate ERK1/2; (B) in LOX-pcDNA cells that are CXCL16-negative and CXCR6-negative, stimulation with neither recombinant CXCR6, nor CXCR6 membranes, nor pCMV membranes yielded ERK1/2 phosphorylation; (C) LOX-ΔCXCL16 cells lacking the intracellular domain of the transmembrane CXCL16 also did not show any activation of the ERK1/2 signaling pathway upon stimulation with recombinant or membrane expressed CXCR6. Examples of n = 3 independent experiments.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Biological effects of reverse signaling via the CXCR6-CXCL16-axis. (A) To investigate effects on proliferation, DNA contents were measured in LOX-CXCL16 and as a control in LOX-pcDNA cells stimulated (or not) with 50 ng/mL recombinant (rec) CXCR6 for 24 or 48 h (upper part). Corresponding experiments were also performed with T98G glioblastoma cells (lower part); 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) served as the positive control for proliferation. Unstimulated controls were set to 100%, respectively, and stimulation with CXCR6 did not yield any significant induction or reduction of DNA content. Mean ± SD from n = 3 independent experiments; (B) apoptosis was induced with 0.1 µg/mL camptothecin (Campto), in comparison to equal volumes of solvent control dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) for 18 h in LOX-CXCL16, LOX-pcDNA and LOX-ΔCXCL16 cells or for 48 h in T98G glioblastoma cells, and simultaneous stimulation with 50 ng/mL recCXCR6 did not reduce cleavage of PARP (cPARP) as detected by Western blot or caspase 3/7 activity as determined by fluorimetric measurement of substrate cleavage, both indicating apoptosis. For Western blotting, equal loading was ensured by reprobing of the membrane with a glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH)-specific antibody. Examples (Western blot) or mean values (caspase activity) of n = 3 independent experiments; (C) to investigate migration, scratch assays were performed with LOX clones LOX-CXCL16, LOX-pcDNA and LOX-ΔCXCL16 or T98G glioblastoma cells stimulated with 50 ng/mL recCXCR6 or left unstimulated for controls. Scratch areas were measured at the beginning and after 8 h, and settled areas were determined as the percentage of the initial scratch area. Stimulation with 50 ng/mL CXCR6 promotes migration of LOX-CXCL16 and T98G cells, but not LOX-pcDNA or LOX-ΔCXCL16 cells. Mean ± SD from n = 4 independent experiments; exemplary images are shown with equal magnifications, respectively; scale bar indicates 50 µm; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01; (D) fast migrating glioblastoma cells from freshly-dissected glioblastomas mostly show higher CXCL16 mRNA expression levels than the slowly migrating cells of the same tumor preparation. ΔCT levels are shown in a logarithmic scale (a 3.33 higher ΔCT value indicates a 10-fold lower mRNA expression), and numbers above the brackets indicate the (linearized) x-fold expression difference between fast and slowly-migrating cells of ten different primary and secondary glioblastoma samples.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Eissner G., Kolch W., Scheurich P. Ligands working as receptors: Reverse signaling by members of the TNF superfamily enhance the plasticity of the immune system. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2004;1:353–366. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2004.03.011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Klein R. Bidirectional modulation of synaptic functions by Eph/ephrin signaling. Nat. Neurosci. 2009;12:15–20. doi: 10.1038/nn.2231. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhou Y., Gunput R.A., Pasterkamp R.J. Semaphorin signaling: Progress made and promises ahead. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2008;33:161–170. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2008.01.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Juhasz K., Buzas K., Duda E. Importance of reverse signaling of the TNF superfamily in immune regulation. Expert Rev. Clin. Immunol. 2013;9:335–348. doi: 10.1586/eci.13.14. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shao Z., Schwarz H. CD137 ligand, a member of the tumor necrosis factor family, regulates immune responses via reverse signal transduction. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2011;89:21–29. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0510315. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources