Medication Errors: A Characterisation of Spontaneously Reported Cases in EudraVigilance
- PMID: 28698988
- PMCID: PMC5688193
- DOI: 10.1007/s40264-017-0569-3
Medication Errors: A Characterisation of Spontaneously Reported Cases in EudraVigilance
Erratum in
-
Correction to: Medication Errors: A Characterisation of Spontaneously Reported Cases in EudraVigilance.Drug Saf. 2017 Dec;40(12):1293. doi: 10.1007/s40264-017-0609-z. Drug Saf. 2017. PMID: 29116609 Free PMC article.
-
Correction to: Medication Errors: A Characterisation of Spontaneously Reported Cases in EudraVigilance.Drug Saf. 2018 Dec;41(12):1439-1440. doi: 10.1007/s40264-018-0700-0. Drug Saf. 2018. PMID: 30027420 Free PMC article.
Abstract
Introduction: Medication errors recently became the focus of regulatory guidance in pharmacovigilance to support reporting, evaluation and prevention of medication errors.
Objective: This study aims to characterise spontaneously reported cases of medication errors in EudraVigilance over the period 2002-2015 before the release of EU good practice guidance.
Methods: Case reports were identified through the adverse reaction section where a Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA®) term is reported and included in the Standardised MedDRA® Query (SMQ) for medication errors. These case reports were further categorised by MedDRA® terms, geographical region, patient age group and Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification system of suspect medicinal product(s).
Results: A total of 147,824 case reports were retrieved, 41,355 of which were from the European Economic Area (EEA). Approximately 60% of these case reports were retrieved with the narrow SMQ. The absolute number of medication error case reports and the proportion to the total number of reports in EudraVigilance increased during the study period, with peaks seen around 2005 and 2012 for cases with EEA origin. Fifty-two percent of case reports in which age was provided occurred in adults, 30% in the elderly and 18% in children, with almost half of these in children aged 2 months to 2 years.
Conclusion: Case reports of medication errors in EudraVigilance steadily increased between 2005 and 2015, the reasons for which may be multifactorial, including increased awareness, changes to the MedDRA® terminology and the 2012 EU pharmacovigilance legislation and associated guidance for stakeholders, or a generally increased risk for errors as more medications become available.
Conflict of interest statement
Funding
No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this article.
Conflicts of interest
Victoria Newbould, Steven Le Meur, Thomas Goedecke and Xavier Kurz have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this study.
Disclaimer
The views expressed in this article are the personal views of the authors and may not be understood or quoted as being made on behalf of or reflecting the position of the EMA or one of its committees or working parties.
Figures
References
-
- Union European. Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use. OJ. 2001;44(L311):67–128.
-
- Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee. Good practice guide on recording, coding, reporting and assessment of medication errors (EMA/762563/2014). http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Regulatory_and_proc... (2015). Accessed 15 Jun 2017.
-
- European Medicines Agency. Guideline on good pharmacovigilance practices (GVP) Module VI—management and reporting of adverse reactions to medicinal products (Rev 1) (EMA/873138/2011 Rev 1). http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guidelin... (2014). Accessed 15 Jun 2017.
-
- E2B(R3) Individual Case Safety Report (ICSR). Specification and related files. http://estri.ich.org/e2br3/index.htm. Accessed 19 Jun 2017.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
