Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jul;12(7):517-522.
doi: 10.12788/jhm.2765.

Implementing ACOVE Quality Indicators as an Intervention Checklist to Improve Care for Hospitalized Older Adults

Affiliations

Implementing ACOVE Quality Indicators as an Intervention Checklist to Improve Care for Hospitalized Older Adults

Liron Sinvani et al. J Hosp Med. 2017 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Medicare patients account for approximately 50% of hospital days. Hospitalization in older adults often results in poor outcomes.

Objective: To test the feasibility and impact of using Assessing Care of Vulnerable Elders (ACOVE) quality indicators (QIs) as a therapeutic intervention to improve care of hospitalized older adults.

Design: >Post-test only prospective intervention with a nonequivalent retrospective control group.

Setting: Large tertiary hospital in the greater New York Metropolitan area.

Patients: Hospitalized patients, 75 years and over, admitted to medical units.

Intervention: A checklist, comprised of four ACOVE QIs, administered during daily interdisciplinary rounds: venous thrombosis prophylaxis (VTE) (QI 1), indwelling bladder catheters (QI 2), mobilization (QI 3), and delirium evaluation (QI 4).

Measurements: Variables were extracted from electronic medical records with QI compliance as primary outcome, and length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition, and readmissions as secondary outcomes. Generalized linear mixed models for binary clustered data were used to estimate compliance rates for each group (intervention group or control group) in the postintervention period, along with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals.

Results: Of the 2,396 patients, 530 were on an intervention unit. In those patients not already compliant with VTE, compliance rate was 57% in intervention vs 39% in control (𝑃 < .0056). For indwelling catheters, mobilization, and delirium evaluation, overall compliance was significantly higher in the intervention group 72.2% vs 54.4% (𝑃 = .1061), 62.9% vs 48.2% (𝑃 < .0001), and 27.9% vs 21.7% (𝑃 = .0027), respectively.

Conclusion: The study demonstrates the feasibility and effectiveness of integrating ACOVE QIs to improve the quality of care in hospitalized older adults.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types