Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jul 11;12(7):e0181161.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181161. eCollection 2017.

Age dependent differences in the kinetics of γδ T cells after influenza vaccination

Affiliations

Age dependent differences in the kinetics of γδ T cells after influenza vaccination

Ulrik Stervbo et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Immunosenescence is a hallmark of the aging immune system and is considered the main cause of a reduced vaccine efficacy in the elderly. Although γδ T cells can become activated by recombinant influenza hemagglutinin, their age-related immunocompetence during a virus-induced immune response has so far not been investigated. In this study we evaluate the kinetics of γδ T cells after vaccination with the trivalent 2011/2012 northern hemisphere seasonal influenza vaccine. We applied multi-parametric flow cytometry to a cohort of 21 young (19-30 years) and 23 elderly (53-67 years) healthy individuals. Activated and proliferating γδ T cells, as identified by CD38 and Ki67 expression, were quantified on the days 0, 3, 7, 10, 14, 17, and 21. We observed a significantly lower number of activated and proliferating γδ T cells at baseline and following vaccination in elderly as compared to young individuals. The kinetics changes of activated γδ T cells were much stronger in the young, while corresponding changes in the elderly occurred slower. In addition, we observed an association between day 21 HAI titers of influenza A and the frequencies of Ki67+ γδ T cells at day 7 in the young. In conclusion, aging induces alterations of the γδ T cell response that might have negative implications for vaccination efficacy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: Epiontis GmbH provided support in the form of salaries for authors (UB, SO), but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. The authors have no further competing interests.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Baseline activation of γδ T cells changes with age.
A) The gating hierarchy of the analyzed populations and their common CD3+ ancestor. Relative frequencies of γδTCR+ subsets (B) and their absolute counts per µl blood at day 0 are shown (C); total CD38+ among γδ T cells (D and E) cells, and total Ki67+ among γδ T cells (F and G). The box represents the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentile and the whiskers represent the range of the observations excluding outliers. Each point signifies a single donor. NS indicate not significant, asterisks indicate p-values (** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05) after comparison with Student's t-test.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Activation status changes rapidly after vaccination.
A) Total Ki67+ among γδTCR+. B) Proportionality in the segments day 0 to 3 and C) day 7 to day 21. D) CD38+Ki67+ among γδTCR+. E) Proportionality in the segments day 0 to 3, and F) day 7 to day 21. The box in figures A and D represents the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentile and the whiskers the range excluding outliers (open circles). Asterisks indicate p-values (*** < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05) after comparison with Student's t-test. p-values were corrected by the FDR method and only significant differences are shown. The two age groups in figures B, C, E, and F are slightly offset to the day of measurement to improve the visualization. Each point represents a single donor. The formula y = β + αx was fitted in B and E. The formula y = β + α/x was fitted in C and F. The given values indicate the proportionality constant α.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Dynamic changes of activated γδ T cells.
A) Kinetics of absolute count of total CD38+ after vaccination. B) Linear fit for day 0 to 6, C) day 7 to 10, D) day 10 to 17, and E) day 17 to 21. F) Kinetics of absolute count of CD38+Ki67 after vaccination. G) Linear fit for day 0 to 6, H) day 7 to 10, I) day 10 to 17, and J) day 17 to 21. The box in figures A and F represents the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentile and the whiskers the range excluding outliers (open circles). Asterisks indicate p-values (*** < 0.001; ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05) after comparison with Student's t-test. p-values were corrected by the FDR method and only significant differences are shown. The two age groups in figures B-E and in G-J are slightly offset to the day of measurement to improve the visualization. Each point represents a single donor. The formula y = β + αx was fitted in B-E and G-J. The given values indicate the proportionality constant α.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Proliferation level associates with vaccination titer in the young.
Day 21 HAI titers of A/California/7/2009 (H1N1) and A/Perth/16/2009 (H3N2) compared to A-B) the frequency of total Ki67+ among γδTCR+ or C-D) the frequency of CD38+Ki67+ among γδTCR+ at day 3 and 7. Correlation by the Spearman rank method. Each point indicates a donor.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Preaud E, Durand L, Macabeo B, Farkas N, Sloesen B, Palache A, et al. Annual public health and economic benefits of seasonal influenza vaccination: a European estimate. BMC Public Health. 2014;14: 813 doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-813 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Osterholm MT, Kelley NS, Sommer A, Belongia EA. Efficacy and effectiveness of influenza vaccines: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2012;12: 36–44. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(11)70295-X - DOI - PubMed
    1. Holtmeier W, Kabelitz D. gammadelta T cells link innate and adaptive immune responses. Chem Immunol Allergy. 2005;86: 151–183. doi: 10.1159/000086659 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chien Y, Meyer C, Bonneville M. γδ T cells: first line of defense and beyond. Annu Rev Immunol. 2014;32: 121–155. doi: 10.1146/annurev-immunol-032713-120216 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wu Y-L, Ding Y-P, Tanaka Y, Shen L-W, Wei C-H, Minato N, et al. γδ T cells and their potential for immunotherapy. Int J Biol Sci. 2014;10: 119–135. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.7823 - DOI - PMC - PubMed