Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Jan 18;13(546):148-151.

[2016 Update in general internal medicine : Good intentions, possible bad outcomes]

[Article in French]
Affiliations
  • PMID: 28703513
Review

[2016 Update in general internal medicine : Good intentions, possible bad outcomes]

[Article in French]
Sofia Zisimopoulou et al. Rev Med Suisse. .

Abstract

Ideally, our clinical practices and decisions should be based on evidence derived from randomized clinical trials. Yet, we often have to determine the potential side effects (including interactions) of drugs that we prescribed using other level of evidence; clinical trials being obviously not appropriate for such situations. Results from observational studies published in 2016 should be of interest to primary care physicians. In this review, we present six of them. Once the limitations of these non-interventional studies acknowledged, primary care physicians should consider these results and be particularly attentive when prescribing these drugs.

Dans l’idéal, nos pratiques et décisions sont guidées sur la base d’évidences issues d’études cliniques randomisées. Cependant, nous devons fréquemment juger des possibles effets indésirables (y inclus interactions) des médicaments que nous prescrivons sur la base d’autres types d’informations, les essais cliniques n’étant pour des raisons évidentes pas réalisables. Les résultats de plusieurs études observationnelles publiées en 2016 dans ce domaine devraient attirer notre attention. Nous présentons ici six d’entre elles. Une fois les limites inhérentes à ce type d’étude considérées, ces résultats nous invitent à être particulièrement vigilants lors de nos prescriptions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Les auteurs n’ont déclaré aucun conflit d’intérêts en relation avec cet article.

Similar articles

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources