Quality of life in patients with leg ulcers: results from CHALLENGE, a double-blind randomised controlled trial
- PMID: 28704156
- DOI: 10.12968/jowc.2017.26.7.368
Quality of life in patients with leg ulcers: results from CHALLENGE, a double-blind randomised controlled trial
Abstract
Objective: We recently showed the superiority of a matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) modulating dressing (foam impregnated with NOSF, nano-oligosaccharide factor) compared with a lipidocolloid matrix (TLC) control dressing in median wound area reduction (WAR). Here we report the results from the same study assessing the performance and safety of TLC-NOSF in the local management of venous leg ulcers (VLUs) or mixed leg ulcers and determining its impact on the patient's health-related quality of life (HRQoL).
Method: A superiority randomised double-blind controlled trial was conducted on patients presenting with a non-infected leg ulcer (VLUs or mixed leg ulcers) of predominantly venous origin (ABPI >0.8), with a surface area ranging from 5 to 50cm2 and a duration of 6 to 36 months. Patients were randomly allocated to either the TLC-NOSF matrix foam (UrgoStart) dressing group or to the neutral TLC foam dressing group (UrgoTul Absorb). All received appropriate compression therapy and the wounds were assessed blindly (clinical examination, wound area tracing and photographic record) every 2 weeks for a period of 8 weeks, or until complete closure. A secondary endpoint, described here, was the patient's HRQoL, documented by the patient, through the EuroQol 5D tool (EQ-5D) questionnaire and visual analogue scale (VAS).
Results: In total, 187 patients were randomised to either the TLC-NOSF group (n=94) or the control dressing group (n=93). The two groups were well balanced at baseline with regard to wound and patient characteristics. In the HRQoL questionnaire (EQ-5D), the pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression dimensions were significantly improved in the TLC-NOSF group versus the control one (pain/discomfort: 1.53±0.53 versus 1.74±0.65; p=0.022, and anxiety/depression: 1.35±0.53 versus 1.54±0.60, p=0.037). The VAS score was better in the test group compared with the control group (72.1±17.5 versus 67.3±18.7, respectively), without reaching significance (p=0.072). Acceptability and tolerance of the two products were similar in both groups.
Conclusion: The double-blind clinical trial has demonstrated that the TLC-NOSF matrix dressing promotes faster healing of VLUs and mixed leg ulcers and significantly reduces the pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression experienced by the patients. These results suggest that acceleration of VLU healing could improve the HRQoL of the patients and reduced the emotional and social burden of these chronic wounds.
Keywords: TLC-NOSF matrix dressing; matrix metalloproteinase modulator; quality of life; randomised controlled trial; venous leg ulcer.
Similar articles
-
Impact of primary dressings on healing of venous leg ulcers: a French cohort study from the healthcare insurance database.J Wound Care. 2024 Sep 2;33(9):678-686. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2024.0189. J Wound Care. 2024. PMID: 39287032
-
The reality of routine practice: a pooled data analysis on chronic wounds treated with TLC-NOSF wound dressings.J Wound Care. 2017 Feb;26(Sup2):S4-S15. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2017.26.Sup2.S4. J Wound Care. 2017. PMID: 28182533
-
A randomized, controlled, double-blind prospective trial with a Lipido-Colloid Technology-Nano-OligoSaccharide Factor wound dressing in the local management of venous leg ulcers.Wound Repair Regen. 2012 Jul-Aug;20(4):500-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2012.00797.x. Epub 2012 Jun 8. Wound Repair Regen. 2012. PMID: 22681551 Clinical Trial.
-
TLC-NOSF dressings as a first-line local treatment of chronic wounds: a systematic review of clinical evidence.J Wound Care. 2024 Oct 2;33(10):756-770. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2024.0208. J Wound Care. 2024. PMID: 39388207
-
Benefits of sucrose octasulfate (TLC-NOSF) dressings in the treatment of chronic wounds: a systematic review.J Wound Care. 2021 Apr 1;30(Sup4):S42-S52. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2021.30.Sup4.S42. J Wound Care. 2021. PMID: 33856929
Cited by
-
Nanocomposites used in the treatment of skin lesions: a scoping review.Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2024 May 13;58:e20230338. doi: 10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2023-0338en. eCollection 2024. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2024. PMID: 38743957 Free PMC article.
-
A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Clinical Trial Evaluating a Lyopreserved Amniotic Membrane in the Treatment of Venous Leg Ulcers.Health Sci Rep. 2025 May 4;8(5):e70819. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70819. eCollection 2025 May. Health Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40330756 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of composite biodegradable biomaterials on wound healing in diabetes.Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Nov 25;10:1060026. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.1060026. eCollection 2022. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022. PMID: 36507270 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Venous, Arterial, and Neuropathic Leg Ulcers With Emphasis on the Geriatric Population.Cureus. 2023 Apr 25;15(4):e38123. doi: 10.7759/cureus.38123. eCollection 2023 Apr. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 37252574 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Dressings and topical agents for arterial leg ulcers.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 20;1(1):CD001836. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001836.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 31978262 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources