Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2017 Sep;34(11):1125-1130.
doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1604161. Epub 2017 Jul 13.

Prophylactic Wound Vacuum Therapy after Cesarean Section to Prevent Wound Complications in the Obese Population: A Randomized Controlled Trial (the ProVac Study)

Kelly Ruhstaller  1 , Katheryne L Downes  1 , Suchitra Chandrasekaran  2 , Sindhu Srinivas  1 , Celeste Durnwald  1
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Prophylactic Wound Vacuum Therapy after Cesarean Section to Prevent Wound Complications in the Obese Population: A Randomized Controlled Trial (the ProVac Study)

Kelly Ruhstaller et al. Am J Perinatol. 2017 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to perform a randomized controlled feasibility trial investigating negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) system versus a standard postcesarean wound care (WC) on the development of a postoperative surgical site infection (SSI) and/or a wound dehiscence in obese women.

Study Design: This is a randomized controlled feasibility trial of obese women undergoing an unscheduled cesarean delivery. Women with an initial body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2 who were ≥ 4 cm dilated were included. Women were assigned to either a NPWT or standard WC. The primary outcome was a composite of wound morbidity at 4 weeks postpartum including SSI and/or wound opening (clinicaltrials. gov, NCT02128997). Continuous variables were analyzed with t-test and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests and categorical variables with Fisher’s exact test.

Results: Of 136 women randomized, 67 received NPWT and 69 received standard WC. The 4-week follow-up rate was 88%. Maternal clinical and surgical characteristics were similar between the groups. The prevalence of the composite wound morbidity outcome was not different between those with NPWT and standard WC (4.9 vs. 6.9%; p = 0.71).

Conclusion: Routine clinical use of a NPWT system after cesarean delivery did not result in a significant reduction of wound morbidity over standard WC.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Prevena negative wound pressure therapy system.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Study enrollment.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Krieger Y, Walfisch A, Sheiner E. Surgical site infection following cesarean deliveries: trends and risk factors. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;30(01):8–12. - PubMed
    1. Smaill FM, Grivell RM. Antibiotic prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis for preventing infection after cesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;10:CD007482. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tuuli MG, Liu J, Stout MJ, et al. A randomized trial comparing skin antiseptic agents at cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(07):647–655. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Olsen MA, Butler AM, Willers DM, Gross GA, Hamilton BH, Fraser VJ. Attributable costs of surgical site infection and endometritis after low transverse cesarean delivery. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010;31(03):276–282. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kominiarek MA, Vanveldhuisen P, Hibbard J, et al. Consortium on Safe Labor The maternal body mass index: a strong association with delivery route. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(03):264.e1–264.e7. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data