Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2017 Jul 14;17(1):120.
doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-0960-x.

Development and pilot testing of an interprofessional patient-centered team training programme in medical rehabilitation clinics in Germany: a process evaluation

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Development and pilot testing of an interprofessional patient-centered team training programme in medical rehabilitation clinics in Germany: a process evaluation

Sonja Becker et al. BMC Med Educ. .

Abstract

Background: Interprofessional teamwork is considered to be a key component of patient-centred treatment in healthcare, and especially in the rehabilitation sector. To date, however, no interventions exist for improving teamwork in rehabilitation clinics in Germany. A team training programme was therefore designed that is individualised in content but standardised regarding methods and process. It is clinic specific, task related, solution focused and context oriented. The aim of the study was to implement and evaluate this training for interprofessional teams in rehabilitation clinics in Germany.

Methods: The measure consists of a training of a varying number of sessions with rehabilitation teams that consists of four distinct phases. Those are undergone chronologically, each with clinic-specific contents. It was implemented between 2013 and 2014 in five rehabilitation clinics in Germany and evaluated by the participants via questionnaire (n = 52).

Results: Staff in three clinics evaluated the programme as helpful, in particular rating moderation, discussions and communication during the training positively. Staff in the remaining two clinics rated it as not very or not helpful and mentioned long-term structural problems or a lack of need for team training as a reason for this.

Conclusions: The team training is applicable and accepted by staff. It should, however, be tested in a greater sample and compared with a control group. Processes should be studied in more detail in order to determine what differentiates successful from non-successful interventions and the different requirements each of these might have.

Keywords: Chronic care; Interprofessional; Process evaluation; Rehabilitation; Team training; Teamwork.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All data collection, saving, and usage of personal data was based on ethical guidelines. Informed consent was obtained from all participants. A positive ethical vote of the University of Freiburg is available (No 190/12).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors’ declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Körner M. Ein Modell der partizipativen Entscheidungsfindung in der medizinischen Rehabilitation [A Model of Shared Decision-making in Medical Rehabilitation] Rehabilitation (Stuttg) 2009;48:160–165. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1220748. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Körner M. Patient-centered care through internal and external participation in medical rehabilitation. Health. 2013;5:48–55. doi: 10.4236/health.2013.56A2008. - DOI
    1. Meier C. Importance of good teamwork in urgent care services. Emerg Nurse. 2014;22:32–36. doi: 10.7748/en.22.7.32.e1312. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Weinberg DB, Cooney-Miner D, Perloff JN, Babington L, Avgar AC. Building collaborative capacity: promoting interdisciplinary teamwork in the absence of formal teams. Med Care. 2011;49:716–723. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318215da3f. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Grumbach K, Bodenheimer T. Can health care teams improve primary care practice? JAMA. 2004;291:1246–1251. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.10.1246. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources