Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Dec;38(12):2222-2230.
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5314. Epub 2017 Jul 13.

Pacemakers in MRI for the Neuroradiologist

Affiliations
Review

Pacemakers in MRI for the Neuroradiologist

A W Korutz et al. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017 Dec.

Abstract

Cardiac implantable electronic devices are frequently encountered in clinical practice in patients being screened for MR imaging examinations. Traditionally, the presence of these devices has been considered a contraindication to undergoing MR imaging. Growing evidence suggests that most of these patients can safely undergo an MR imaging examination if certain conditions are met. This document will review the relevant cardiac implantable electronic devices encountered in practice today, the background physics/technical factors related to scanning these devices, the multidisciplinary screening protocol used at our institution for scanning patients with implantable cardiac devices, and our experience in safely performing these examinations since 2010.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1.
Fig 1.
Normal versus first-level mode: normal level only for neuroradiology. SAR information panel at the scanner console for a sagittal STIR TSE acquisition of the lumbar spine. Any neurologic imaging study that can be run on a 1.5T magnet, including echo-planar imaging, can be performed in a patient with a CIED, as long as the examination is performed in normal operating mode. Image courtesy of Charles Fasanati.
Fig 2.
Fig 2.
Comprehensive safety protocol: collaboration between neuroradiology and cardiology.
Fig 3.
Fig 3.
Risk categorization: inappropriate device sensing during MR imaging. Intracardiac electrograms from a patient with a dual-chamber ICD. Electromagnetic interference is seen on both atrial and ventricular channels (solid arrows), resulting in oversensing (dashed arrow) and an inappropriate ICD shock (asterisk).
Fig 4.
Fig 4.
Absolute contraindications: chest x-ray examinations with abandoned and epicardial leads. Posteroanterior view of the chest (A) demonstrates an abandoned lead (black arrows) in a patient with a dual-chamber pacemaker device. B, An abandoned right ventricular lead (black arrows) in a patient with a single-lead pacemaker device. The black arrowhead denotes a fracture of the abandoned lead. C, A patient with a biventricular ICD pacing system, which includes transvenous atrial and right ventricular leads and 2 permanent epicardial pacing leads (black arrows). None of these 3 patients would be cleared to undergo MR imaging examination at our institution.

Comment in

  • Reply.
    Korutz AW, Russell EJ, Hijaz TA, Collins JD, Knight BP, Nemeth AJ. Korutz AW, et al. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018 Feb;39(2):E37. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5467. Epub 2017 Oct 26. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018. PMID: 29074630 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
  • Economic Considerations in MR Imaging of Patients with Cardiac Devices.
    Antonucci MU, Spampinato MV, Ritenour ER. Antonucci MU, et al. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018 Feb;39(2):E36. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5450. Epub 2017 Oct 26. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018. PMID: 29074631 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
  • Reply.
    Korutz AW, Hijaz TA, Collins JD, Nemeth AJ. Korutz AW, et al. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018 May;39(5):E56. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5575. Epub 2018 Mar 1. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018. PMID: 29496727 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
  • Pacemakers in MRI for the Neuroradiologist: Revisited.
    Kanal E. Kanal E. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018 May;39(5):E54-E55. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5565. Epub 2018 Mar 1. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018. PMID: 29496728 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. OECD. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) exams, total. Health: Key Tables. OECD 2014. https://data.oecd.org/healthcare/magnetic-resonance-imaging-mri-exams.htm. Accessed December 24, 2016.
    1. Nazarian S, Hansford R, Roguin A, et al. . A prospective evaluation of a protocol for magnetic resonance imaging of patients with implanted cardiac devices. Ann Intern Med 2011;155:415–24 10.7326/0003-4819-155-7-201110040-00004 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kanal E, Barkovich AJ, Bell C, et al. ; ACR Blue Ribbon Panel on MR Safety. ACR guidance document for safe MR practices: 2007. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;188:1447–74 10.2214/AJR.06.1616 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Levine GN, Gomes AS, Arai AE, et al. ; American Heart Association Committee on Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization, American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology, American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention. Safety of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiovascular devices: an American Heart Association scientific statement from the Committee on Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention: endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation, the North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. Circulation 2007;116:2878–91 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.187256 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Roguin A, Schwitter J, Vahlhaus C, et al. . Magnetic resonance imaging in individuals with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices. Europace 2008;10:336–46 10.1093/europace/eun021 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms