Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jul 12;7(7):e014795.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014795.

Evaluation of the geriatric co-management for patients with fragility fractures of the proximal femur (Geriatric Fracture Centre (GFC) concept): protocol for a prospective multicentre cohort study

Alexander Joeris  1 , Anahí Hurtado-Chong  1 , Denise Hess  1 , Vasiliki Kalampoki  1 , Michael Blauth  2
Affiliations

Evaluation of the geriatric co-management for patients with fragility fractures of the proximal femur (Geriatric Fracture Centre (GFC) concept): protocol for a prospective multicentre cohort study

Alexander Joeris et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Treatment of fractures in the elderly population is a clinical challenge due partly to the presence of comorbidities. In a Geriatric Fracture Centre (GFC), patients are co-managed by a geriatrician in an attempt to improve clinical outcomes and reduce morbidity and mortality. Until now the beneficial effect of orthogeriatric co-management has not been definitively proven. The primary objective of this study is to determine the effect of GFC on predefined major adverse events related to a hip fracture compared to usual care centres (UCC). The secondary objectives include assessments in quality of life, patient-reported outcomes and cost-effectiveness.

Methods and analysis: Two hundred and sixty-six elderly patients diagnosedwith hip fracture and planned to be treated with osteosynthesis or endoprosthesis in either a GFC or UCC study site will be recruited, 133 per type of centre. All procedures and management will be done according to the site's standard of care. Study-related visits will be performed at the following time points: preoperative, intraoperative, discharge from the orthopaedic/trauma department, discharge to definite residential status, 12 weeks and 12 months postsurgery. Data collected include demographics, residential status, adverse events, patient-reported outcomes, fall history, costs and resources related to treatment. The risk of major adverse events at 12 months will be calculated for each centre type; patient-reported outcomes will be analysed by mixed effects regression models to estimate differences in mean scores between baseline and follow-ups whereas cost-effectiveness will be assessed using the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.

Ethics and dissemination: Ethics approval for this study was granted from the local Ethics Committees or Institutional Review Board from each of the participating sites prior to patient enrolment. The results of this study will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at different conferences.

Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02297581; pre-results.

Keywords: GERIATRIC MEDICINE; HEALTH ECONOMICS; Hip; ORTHOPAEDIC & TRAUMA SURGERY; TRAUMA MANAGEMENT.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: AH-C, AJ, DH and VK are AOCID employees and receive salary from the AO Foundation.

References

    1. Braithwaite RS, Col NF, Wong JB. Estimating hip fracture morbidity, mortality and costs. J Am Geriatr Soc 2003;51:364–70. 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2003.51110.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pretto M, Spirig R, Kaelin R, et al. Outcomes of elderly hip fracture patients in the Swiss healthcare system: a survey prior to the implementation of DRGs and prior to the implementation ofa geriatric fracture Centre. Swiss Med Wkly 2010;140:w13086 10.4414/smw.2010.13086 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Friedman SM, Mendelson DA, Kates SL, et al. Geriatric co-management of proximal femur fractures: total quality management and protocol-driven care result in better outcomes for a frail patient population. J Am Geriatr Soc 2008;56:1349–56. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01770.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kammerlander C, Roth T, Friedman SM, et al. Ortho-geriatric service–a literature review comparing different models. Osteoporos Int 2010;21:S637–46. 10.1007/s00198-010-1396-x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Adunsky A, Arad M, Levi R, et al. Five-year experience with the 'Sheba' model of comprehensive orthogeriatric care for elderly hip fracture patients. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27:1123–7. 10.1080/09638280500056030 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data