Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jun 22;3(6):e00328.
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2017.e00328. eCollection 2017 Jun.

Abdominal symptoms in general practice: Frequency, cancer suspicions raised, and actions taken by GPs in six European countries. Cohort study with prospective registration of cancer

Knut Holtedahl  1 , Peter Vedsted  2 , Lars Borgquist  3 , Gé A Donker  4 , Frank Buntinx  5 , David Weller  6 , Tonje Braaten  1 , Peter Hjertholm  2 , Jörgen Månsson  7 , Eva Lena Strandberg  8 , Christine Campbell  6 , Lisbeth Ellegaard  1 , Ranjan Parajuli  1
Affiliations

Abdominal symptoms in general practice: Frequency, cancer suspicions raised, and actions taken by GPs in six European countries. Cohort study with prospective registration of cancer

Knut Holtedahl et al. Heliyon. .

Abstract

Background: Abdominal symptoms are diagnostically challenging to general practitioners (GPs): although common, they may indicate cancer. In a prospective cohort of patients, we examined abdominal symptom frequency, initial diagnostic suspicion, and actions of GPs in response to abdominal symptoms.

Methods: Over a 10-day period, 493 GPs in Norway, Denmark, Sweden, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Scotland, recorded consecutive consultations: sex, date of birth and any specified abdominal symptoms. For patients with abdominal symptoms, additional data on non-specific symptoms, GPs' diagnostic suspicion, and features of the consultation were noted. Data on all cancer diagnoses among all included patients were requested from the GPs eight months later.

Findings: Consultations with 61802 patients were recorded. Abdominal symptoms were recorded in 6264 (10.1%) patients. A subsequent malignancy was reported in 511 patients (0.8%): 441 (86.3%) had a new cancer, 70 (13.7%) a recurrent cancer. Abdominal symptoms were noted in 129 (25.2%) of cancer patients (P < 0.001), rising to 34.5% for the 89 patients with cancer located in the abdominal region. PPV for any cancer given any abdominal symptom was 2.1%. In symptomatic patients diagnosed with cancer, GPs noted a suspicion of cancer for 85 (65.9%) versus 1895 (30.9%) when there was no subsequent cancer (P < 0.001). No suspicion was noted in 32 (24.8%) cancer patients. The GP's intuitive cancer suspicion was independently associated with a subsequent new cancer diagnosis (OR 2.11, 95% CI 1.15-3.89). Laboratory tests were ordered for 45.4% of symptomatic patients, imaging for 10.4%, referral or hospitalization for 20.0%: all were more frequent in subsequent cancer patients (P < 0.001).

Interpretation: Abdominal symptoms pointed to abdominal cancers rather than to other cancers. However, the finding of abdominal symptoms in only one third of patients with an abdominal cancer, and the lack of cancer suspicion in a quarter of symptomatic cancer patients, provide challenges for GPs' diagnostic thinking and referral practices.

Keywords: Evidence-based medicine; Medicine; Oncology; Public health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Inclusion and exclusion of patients with cancer.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Distribution of abdominal and general symptoms in 23928 male and 37874 female patients consulting in primary care.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Holtedahl K.A. University of Tromsø; Norway: 1991. Diagnosis of Cancer in General Practice. A Study of Delay Problems and Warning Signals of Cancer, with Implications for Public Cancer Information and for Cancer Diagnostic Strategies in General Practice (Thesis)http://hdl.handle.net/10037/2325 ISM skriftserie nr. 16.
    1. Allgar V.L., Neal R.D. General practitioners' management of cancer in England: secondary analysis of data from the National Survey of NHS Patients—Cancer. Eur. J. Cancer Care. 2005;14:409–416. - PubMed
    1. Demagny L., Holtedahl K., Bachimont J., Thorsen T., Letourmy A., Bungener M. General practitioners' role in cancer care: a French-Norwegian study. BMC Res. Notes. 2009;2:200. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rubin G., Berendsen A., Crawford S.M., Dommett R., Earle C., Emery J. The expanding role of primary care in cancer control. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(12):1231–1272. - PubMed
    1. Ingebrigtsen S.G., Scheel B.I., Hart B., Thorsen T., Holtedahl K. Frequency of ‘warning signs of cancer' in Norwegian general practice, with prospective recording of subsequent cancer. Fam. Pract. 2013;30(2):153–160. - PubMed