Diagnostic accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF for tuberculosis detection in different regions with different endemic burden: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 28708844
- PMCID: PMC5510832
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180725
Diagnostic accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF for tuberculosis detection in different regions with different endemic burden: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Purpose: To estimate the diagnostic accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF, a systematic review and meta-analysis were carried out.
Methods: Up to June 20, 2015, multiple databases were screened for relevant studies.
Results: Accordingly, 106 studies included 52,410 samples were selected. Diagnostic accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF for TB detection was validated against either culture or a composite reference standard (CRS). Additionally, selected studies were further subgrouped in four groups based on sample's type, subject's age, status of HIV co-infection and smear-positivity. The overall pooled sensitivity and specificity of Xpert MTB/RIF was 0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.82-0.88) and 0.98 (95% CI 0.96-0.98), respectively, compared to culture; while it was 0.59 (95% CI 0.44-0.72) and 0.99 (95% CI 0.97-1.00) compared to CRS. The overall sensitivity was lower in countries with high TB prevalence than countries with middle/low prevalence (0.84, 95% CI: 0.80-0.88 versus 0.89, 95% CI: 0.84-0.93). Furthermore, Xpert MTB/RIF has higher sensitivity in patients with positive smears (0.99, 95% CI 0.97-0.99), in patients with pulmonary TB samples (0.87, 95% CI 0.83-0.90), in adults (0.82, 95% CI 0.76-0.86) and in HIV-positive patients (0.81, 95% CI 0.73-0.87).
Conclusions: Taken together, Xpert MTB/RIF is a quick and accurate diagnostic assay for TB which will significantly help the physicians to make their clinical decisions.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures



References
-
- Zumla A, George A, Sharma V, Herbert RHN, of Ilton BM, Oxley A, et al. (2015) The WHO 2014 global tuberculosis report—further to go. The Lancet Global Health 3 (1):e10–e12 doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70361-4 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Zumla A, Abubakar I, Raviglione M, Hoelscher M, Ditiu L, McHugh TD, et al. (2012) Drug-resistant tuberculosis—current dilemmas, unanswered questions, challenges, and priority needs. The Journal of infectious diseases 205 Suppl 2:S228–240. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jir858 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Weyer K, Mirzayev F, Migliori GB, Van Gemert W, D'Ambrosio L, Zignol M, et al. (2013) Rapid molecular TB diagnosis: evidence, policy making and global implementation of Xpert MTB/RIF. The European respiratory journal 42 (1):252–271. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00157212 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Zumla A, George A, Sharma V, Herbert N, Baroness Masham of I (2013) WHO's 2013 global report on tuberculosis: successes, threats, and opportunities. Lancet 382 (9907):1765–1767. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62078-4 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Chaisson RE, Nuermberger EL (2012) Confronting multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. The New England journal of medicine 366 (23):2223–2224. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe1204478 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical