A comparison of the validity of the Demirjian, Willems, Nolla and Häävikko methods in determination of chronological age of 5-15 year-old Indian children
- PMID: 28708981
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jflm.2017.07.007
A comparison of the validity of the Demirjian, Willems, Nolla and Häävikko methods in determination of chronological age of 5-15 year-old Indian children
Abstract
Background: Demirjian's method has been the most popular and extensively tested radiographic method of age estimation. More recently, Willems' method has been reported to be a better predictor of age. Nolla's and Häävikko's methods have been used to a lesser extent. Very few studies have compared all four methods in non-Indian and Indian populations. Most Indian research is limited by inadequate sample sizes, age structures and grouping and different approaches to statistical analysis.
Aim: The present study aimed to evaluate and compare the validity of the Demirjian, Willems, Nolla and Häävikko methods in determination of chronological age of 5 to 15 year-old Indian children.
Design: In this cross-sectional observational study, four methods were compared for validity in estimating the age of 1200 Indian children aged 5-15 years.
Results: Demirjian's method overestimated age by +0.24 ± 0.80, +0.11 ± 0.81 and +0.19 ± 0.80 years in boys, girls and the total sample, respectively. With Willems' method, overestimations of +0.09 ± 0.80, +0.08 ± 0.80 and +0.09 ± 0.80 years were obtained in boys, girls and the total sample, respectively. Nolla's method underestimated age by -0.13 ± 0.80, -0.30 ± 0.82 and -0.20 ± 0.81 years in boys, girls and the total sample, respectively. Häävikko's method underestimated age by -0.17 ± 0.80, -0.29 ± 0.83 and -0.22 ± 0.82 years in boys, girls and the total sample, respectively. Statistically significant differences were observed between dental and chronological ages with all methods (p < 0.001). Significant gender-based differences were observed with all methods except Willems' (p < 0.05). Gender-specific regression formulae were derived for all methods.
Conclusion: Willems' method most accurately estimated age, followed by Demirjian's, Nolla's and Häävikko's methods. All four methods could be applicable for estimating age in the present population, mean prediction errors being lower than 0.30 years (3.6 months).
Keywords: Age estimation; Demirjian; Häävikko; Indian children; Nolla; Willems.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd and Faculty of Forensic and Legal Medicine. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Accuracy of age estimation of radiographic methods using developing teeth.Forensic Sci Int. 2006 May 15;159 Suppl 1:S68-73. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.02.019. Epub 2006 Mar 14. Forensic Sci Int. 2006. PMID: 16533584
-
The applicability of the Demirjian, Willems and Chaillet standards to age estimation of 5-15 year old Indian children.J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2019 May 1;37(1):40-50. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2019. PMID: 31187742 Free PMC article.
-
Reliability and validity of five radiographic dental-age estimation methods in a population of Malaysian children.J Investig Clin Dent. 2016 Feb;7(1):102-9. doi: 10.1111/jicd.12116. Epub 2014 Jul 22. J Investig Clin Dent. 2016. PMID: 25048008
-
Dental age estimation: Demirjian's versus the other methods in different populations. A literature review.Med Sci Law. 2021 Jan;61(1_suppl):125-129. doi: 10.1177/0025802420934253. Med Sci Law. 2021. PMID: 33591866
-
Assessment of dental age estimation methods applied to Brazilian children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2021 Feb 1;50(2):20200128. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20200128. Epub 2020 Jun 12. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2021. PMID: 32479117 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Accuracy of second and third molar maturity indices, Olze, Haavikko, and Demirjian methods for 14- and 16-year-old age thresholds assessment in Croatian children and adolescents.Int J Legal Med. 2024 Nov;138(6):2411-2425. doi: 10.1007/s00414-024-03278-0. Epub 2024 Jul 11. Int J Legal Med. 2024. PMID: 38987428
-
Bibliometric analysis of research on dental age estimation.J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2023 Dec 27;41(3):26-44. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2023. PMID: 38183970 Free PMC article.
-
Performance of the London Atlas, Willems, and a new quick method for dental age estimation in Chinese Uyghur children.BMC Oral Health. 2022 Dec 21;22(1):624. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02652-x. BMC Oral Health. 2022. PMID: 36544118 Free PMC article.
-
Accuracy of age estimation and assessment of the 18-year threshold based on second and third molar maturity in Koreans and Japanese.PLoS One. 2022 Jul 8;17(7):e0271247. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271247. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 35802665 Free PMC article.
-
A systematic overview of dental methods for age assessment in living individuals: from traditional to artificial intelligence-based approaches.Int J Legal Med. 2023 Jul;137(4):1117-1146. doi: 10.1007/s00414-023-02960-z. Epub 2023 Apr 14. Int J Legal Med. 2023. PMID: 37055627 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources