Comparison of skin-sparing mastectomy using LigaSure™ Small Jaw and electrocautery
- PMID: 28709454
- PMCID: PMC5512734
- DOI: 10.1186/s12957-017-1199-z
Comparison of skin-sparing mastectomy using LigaSure™ Small Jaw and electrocautery
Abstract
Background: Skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) is increasingly used in patients with breast cancer. We compared the differences between use of electrocautery and LigaSure™ Small Jaw in patients with breast cancer who underwent SSM.
Methods: Between January 2012 and December 2015, 81 patients with breast cancer who underwent SSM were selected and were divided into the electrocautery group and the LigaSure™ Small Jaw group based on the devices that were used. Clinicopathological characteristics, body mass index, operative time, and weight of removed breast were obtained from medical records. Total amount and days of drain use, until removal, and postoperative skin necrosis, requiring debridement, were also analyzed.
Results: The study population consisted of 50 patients in the electrocautery group and 31 in the LigaSure™ Small Jaw group. The latter group has significantly shorter operative time (117.5 ± 16.9 vs. 104.0 ± 23.6 min, P = 0.004). The mean total volume of drainage was less (805 ± 278 vs. 694 ± 131 mL, P = 0.017) and mean duration of drainage was also significantly shorter in the LigaSure™ Small Jaw group (11.3 ± 2.5 vs. 10.1 ± 2.0 days, P = 0.029).
Conclusions: The use of LigaSure™ Small Jaw during skin-sparing mastectomy shortened the operative time and duration of drainage and reduced the total volume of drainage.
Keywords: Electrocautery; Energy devices; LigaSure™ Small Jaw; Skin-sparing mastectomy.
Conflict of interest statement
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This retrospective study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Korea University Medical Center, Ansan.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Monopolar diathermy versus a vessel-sealing device for reducing postoperative drain output after simple mastectomy: randomized clinical trial.Br J Surg. 2024 Mar 2;111(3):znae029. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znae029. Br J Surg. 2024. PMID: 38498075 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The Clinical Usefulness of the LigaSure™ Small Jaw in Axillary Lymph Node Dissection in Patients with Breast Cancer.Anticancer Res. 2018 Apr;38(4):2359-2362. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.12483. Anticancer Res. 2018. PMID: 29599361 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison between bipolar scissors, monopolar electrocautery, and hydrodissection in nipple-sparing mastectomy.Surg Oncol. 2025 Feb;58:102182. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102182. Epub 2024 Dec 19. Surg Oncol. 2025. PMID: 39718307
-
Surgical outcomes of total thyroidectomy using the LigaSure™ Small Jaw versus LigaSure Precise™: A retrospective study of 2000 consecutive patients.Int J Surg. 2017 Jan;37:8-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.08.241. Epub 2016 Aug 23. Int J Surg. 2017. PMID: 27565244
-
Does post-mastectomy radiotherapy represent a contraindication to skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction: an update.Surg Oncol. 2012 Jun;21(2):e67-74. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2011.12.007. Epub 2012 Jan 30. Surg Oncol. 2012. PMID: 22296996 Review.
Cited by
-
Usefulness of cordless ultrasonic cutting energy devices in endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy: a retrospective study.Ann Surg Treat Res. 2024 Mar;106(3):147-154. doi: 10.4174/astr.2024.106.3.147. Epub 2024 Feb 22. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2024. PMID: 38435493 Free PMC article.
-
A Prospective Randomized Study to Compare Postoperative Drainage After Mastectomy Using Electrosurgical Bipolar Systems and Conventional Electro-Cautery.J Breast Cancer. 2022 Aug;25(4):307-317. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2022.25.e29. Epub 2022 Jun 27. J Breast Cancer. 2022. PMID: 35914746 Free PMC article.
-
Advanced hemostasis in axillary lymph node dissection for locally advanced breast cancer: new technology devices compared in the prevention of seroma formation.BMC Surg. 2019 Apr 24;18(Suppl 1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12893-018-0454-8. BMC Surg. 2019. PMID: 31074399 Free PMC article.
-
Monopolar diathermy versus a vessel-sealing device for reducing postoperative drain output after simple mastectomy: randomized clinical trial.Br J Surg. 2024 Mar 2;111(3):znae029. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znae029. Br J Surg. 2024. PMID: 38498075 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of Single Incision Endoscopic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Conventional Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy for Breast Cancer Based on Initial Experience.J Breast Cancer. 2021 Apr;24(2):196-205. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2021.24.e18. J Breast Cancer. 2021. PMID: 33913275 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Petit JY, Gentilini O, Rotmensz N, Rey P, Rietjens M, Garusi C, Botteri E, De Lorenzi F, Martella S, Bosco R, et al. Oncological results of immediate breast reconstruction: long term follow-up of a large series at a single institution. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008;112:545–9. doi: 10.1007/s10549-008-9891-x. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical