Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jul 14;7(1):5467.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-05848-2.

Deep Learning based Radiomics (DLR) and its usage in noninvasive IDH1 prediction for low grade glioma

Affiliations

Deep Learning based Radiomics (DLR) and its usage in noninvasive IDH1 prediction for low grade glioma

Zeju Li et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Deep learning-based radiomics (DLR) was developed to extract deep information from multiple modalities of magnetic resonance (MR) images. The performance of DLR for predicting the mutation status of isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) was validated in a dataset of 151 patients with low-grade glioma. A modified convolutional neural network (CNN) structure with 6 convolutional layers and a fully connected layer with 4096 neurons was used to segment tumors. Instead of calculating image features from segmented images, as typically performed for normal radiomics approaches, image features were obtained by normalizing the information of the last convolutional layers of the CNN. Fisher vector was used to encode the CNN features from image slices of different sizes. High-throughput features with dimensionality greater than 1.6*104 were obtained from the CNN. Paired t-tests and F-scores were used to select CNN features that were able to discriminate IDH1. With the same dataset, the area under the operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the normal radiomics method was 86% for IDH1 estimation, whereas for DLR the AUC was 92%. The AUC of IDH1 estimation was further improved to 95% using DLR based on multiple-modality MR images. DLR could be a powerful way to extract deep information from medical images.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Tumor segmentation results for single-modal images and multi-modal images using different network structures. (a) Comparison between the indexes of different segmentation results of different CNNs. Conv. indicates the number of convolutional layers in the CNN structures, and fc. indicates the number of neurons in the fully connected layers in the CNN structures. (b) Three typical cases with segmentation results for the CNN with 6 convolutional layers and fully connected layers with 4096 neurons.
Figure 2
Figure 2
CNN features from the last convolutional layers. (a) An example of specific CNN features. Deep filter responses showed noticeable differences between wild-type and mutant IDH1, and the Fisher vectors could successfully represent the differences.
Figure 3
Figure 3
ROC curves of the prediction results. (a) ROC curves of the radiomics features and DLR of the second cohort with single-modal images. (b) ROC curves of DLR of the first cohort with multiple modal images are shown on the right.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Feature maps of CNN features from different convolutional layers. The four most significant filter banks of different layers were selected. As shown in the figures, feature maps of deeper layers represented more detailed characteristics.
Figure 5
Figure 5
An overview of our DLR. Our approach included two selection steps. The first step is to recognize the tumor regions in the MR images based on a state-of-the-art CNN structure. In the second step, deep filter responses were extracted from the last convolutional layer through Fisher vector encoding. Then, the prediction results were evaluated by a leave-one-out cross-validation SVM.

References

    1. Bourgier C, et al. Radiomics: definition and clinical development. Cancer Radiotherapie. 2015;19:532–537. doi: 10.1016/j.canrad.2015.06.008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aerts HJWL, et al. Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach. Nature communications. 2014;5:4006. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kumar V, et al. Radiomics: the process and the challenges. Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2012;30:1234–1248. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.06.010. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vallieres M, et al. A radiomics model from joint FDG-PET and MRI texture features for the prediction of lung metastases in soft-tissue sarcomas of the extremities. Physicis in Medicine & Biology. 2015;60:5471–5496. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/14/5471. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vignati A, et al. Texture features on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: new potential biomarkers for cancer aggressiveness. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 2015;60:2685–2701. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/7/2685. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources