A Custom-Developed Emergency Department Provider Electronic Documentation System Reduces Operational Efficiency
- PMID: 28712608
- PMCID: PMC5653416
- DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.05.032
A Custom-Developed Emergency Department Provider Electronic Documentation System Reduces Operational Efficiency
Abstract
Study objective: Electronic health record implementation can improve care, but may also adversely affect emergency department (ED) efficiency. We examine how a custom, ED provider, electronic documentation system (eDoc), which replaced paper documentation, affects operational performance.
Methods: We analyzed retrospective operational data for 1-year periods before and after eDoc implementation in a single ED. We computed daily operational statistics, reflecting 60,870 pre- and 59,337 postimplementation patient encounters. The prespecified primary outcome was daily mean length of stay; secondary outcomes were daily mean length of stay for admitted and discharged patients and daily mean arrival time to disposition for admitted patients. We used a prespecified multiple regression model to identify differences in outcomes while controlling for prespecified confounding variables.
Results: The unadjusted change in length of stay was 8.4 minutes; unadjusted changes in secondary outcomes were length of stay for admitted patients 11.4 minutes, length of stay for discharged patients 1.8 minutes, and time to disposition 1.8 minutes. With a prespecified regression analysis to control for variations in operational characteristics, there were significant increases in length of stay (6.3 minutes [95% confidence interval 3.5 to 9.1 minutes]) and length of stay for discharged patients (5.1 minutes [95% confidence interval 1.9 to 8.3 minutes]). There was no statistically significant change in length of stay for admitted patients or time to disposition.
Conclusion: In our single-center study, the isolated implementation of eDoc was associated with increases in overall and discharge length of stay. Our findings suggest that a custom-designed electronic provider documentation may negatively affect ED throughput. Strategies to mitigate these effects, such as reducing documentation requirements or adding clinical staff, scribes, or voice recognition, would be a valuable area of future research.
Copyright © 2017 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
References
-
- Blumenthal D. Stimulating the adoption of health information technology. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1477–1479. - PubMed
-
- Desroches CM, Charles D, Furukawa MF, et al. Adoption Of Electronic Health Records Grows Rapidly, But Fewer Than Half Of US Hospitals Had At Least A Basic System In 2012. Health Aff (Millwood) 2013 - PubMed
-
- Wright A, Henkin S, Feblowitz J, McCoy AB, Bates DW, Sittig DF. Early results of the meaningful use program for electronic health records. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:779–780. - PubMed
-
- Adler-Milstein J, DesRoches CM, Furukawa MF, et al. More than half of US hospitals have at least a basic EHR, but stage 2 criteria remain challenging for most. Health Aff (Millwood) 2014;33:1664–1671. - PubMed
-
- Jamoom E, Hing E. NCHS data brief, no 187. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2015. Progress with electronic health record adoption among emergency and outpatient departments: United States, 2006–2011. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Molecular Biology Databases
