Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Feb;18(2):261-267.
doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.07.008. Epub 2017 Jul 13.

Patient-reported outcomes after surgical stabilization of spinal tumors: symptom-based validation of the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) and surgery

Ibrahim Hussain  1 , Ori Barzilai  2 , Anne S Reiner  3 , Natalie DiStefano  2 , Lily McLaughlin  2 , Shahiba Ogilvie  2 , Mark Bilsky  1 , Ilya Laufer  4
Affiliations

Patient-reported outcomes after surgical stabilization of spinal tumors: symptom-based validation of the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) and surgery

Ibrahim Hussain et al. Spine J. 2018 Feb.

Abstract

Background context: Neoplastic spinal instability is movement-related pain or neurologic compromise under physiologic loads with the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) developed to facilitate diagnosis. There is a paucity of evidence that mechanical instability correlates with patient-reported symptoms and that surgical stabilization significantly improves these patient-reported outcomes (PROs).

Purpose: The objective of this study was to determine if SINS correlates with patient-reported preoperative pain and disability, and if surgical stabilization significantly improves PRO.

Study design: A single-institution prospective cohort study was carried out.

Patient sample: A total of 131 patients who underwent stabilization for metastatic spinal tumor treatment between July 2014 and August 2016 were included.

Outcomes measures: Preoperative baseline and mean difference in perioperative PROs as assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) and MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) were the outcome measures.

Methods: The SINS was analyzed as a continuous, ordinal, and categorical variable (Stable: 0-6, Indeterminate: 7-12, Unstable: 13-18). Statistical analysis was performed using Spearman rank coefficient (rho), the Kruskal-Wallis test, and an extension of the Cochran-Armitage trend test. The SINS and association between the mean differences in post- and preoperative PRO scores was analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

Results: There was a statistically significant positive correlation between increasing SINS and severity of preoperative pain with BPI average pain (rho=0.20; p=.03) and MDASI pain (rho=0.19; p=.03). Increasing SINS correlated with severity of preoperative disability with BPI walking (rho=0.19; p=.04), MDASI activity (rho=0.24; p=.006), and MDASI walking (rho=0.20; p=.03). Similar associations were noted when SINS was analyzed as an ordinal categorical variable. Stabilization significantly improved nearly all PRO measures for patients with indeterminate and unstable SINS. Significant correlations persisted when controlling for neurologic status and were not affected based on the technique of surgical stabilization used.

Conclusions: Patient-related outcome-based validation of SINS confirms this scoring system for diagnosing neoplastic spinal instability and provides surgeons with a tool to determine which patients will benefit from stabilization. Surgical stabilization of cancer patients with SINS consistent with mechanical instability provides significant reduction in pain and improves patient mobility independent of neurologic status and stabilization technique.

Keywords: Metastatic tumor; Patient-reported outcomes; Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score; Spinal instability; Spinal tumor; Surgical stabilization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. White AA 3rd, Panjabi MM. Update on the evaluation of instability of the lower cervical spine. Instr Course Lect. 1987;36:513–20. - PubMed
    1. Asdourian PL, Mardjetko S, Rauschning W, Jonsson H Jr., Hammerberg KW, Dewald RL. An evaluation of spinal deformity in metastatic breast cancer. J Spinal Disord. 1990;3(2):119–34. - PubMed
    1. Greenlee RT, Murray T, Bolden S, Wingo PA. Cancer statistics, 2000. CA Cancer J Clin. 2000;50(1):7–33. - PubMed
    1. Siegel T Surgical management of malignant epidural tumors compressing the spinal cord. In: Schmidek HH SW, ed. Operative Neurosurgical Techniques Indications, Methods, and Results. 3 ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1995. p. 1997–2025.
    1. Lee CH, Kwon JW, Lee J, et al. Direct decompressive surgery followed by radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for metastatic epidural spinal cord compression: a meta-analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2014;39(9):E587–92. - PubMed