Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2017 Oct 1;3(10):1378-1385.
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.1007.

Germline Mutation Status, Pathological Complete Response, and Disease-Free Survival in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Secondary Analysis of the GeparSixto Randomized Clinical Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Germline Mutation Status, Pathological Complete Response, and Disease-Free Survival in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Secondary Analysis of the GeparSixto Randomized Clinical Trial

Eric Hahnen et al. JAMA Oncol. .

Abstract

Importance: The GeparSixto trial provided evidence that the addition of neoadjuvant carboplatin to a regimen consisting of anthracycline, taxane, and bevacizumab increases pathological complete response (pCR) rates in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Whether BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutation status affects treatment outcome remains elusive.

Objective: To determine whether BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutation status affects therapy response in patients with TNBC.

Design, setting, and participants: This secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial used archived DNA samples and cancer family history of 315 patients with TNBC enrolled between August 1, 2011, and December 31, 2012, in the GeparSixto trial. In all, 291 participants (92.4%) were included in this multicenter prospective investigation. DNA samples were analyzed for germline mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, and 16 other cancer predisposition genes. The pCR rates between the carboplatin and noncarboplatin arms were compared. Genetic analyses were performed at the Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer in Cologne, Germany; data analysis, November 1 through December 31, 2015.

Main outcomes and measures: Proportion of patients who achieved pCR and disease-free survival after neoadjuvant treatment according to BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutation status. For pCR rates, the ypT0/is ypN0 definition was used as a primary end point.

Results: Of the 291 patients with TNBC, all were women; the mean (SD) age was 48 (11) years. The pCR rate in the carboplatin group was 56.8% (83 of 146) and 41.4% (60 of 145) in the noncarboplatin group (odds ratio [OR], 1.87; 95% CI, 1.17-2.97; P = .009). Pathogenic BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations were present in 50 of the 291 patients (17.2%). In the noncarboplatin arm, the pCR rate was 66.7% (16 of 24) for patients with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations and 36.4% (44 of 121) for patients without (OR, 3.50; 95% CI, 1.39-8.84; P = .008). The high pCR rate observed in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers (16 of 24 [66.7%]) was not increased further by adding carboplatin (17 of 26 [65.4%]). In contrast, carboplatin increased response rates in patients without BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations: 66 of the 120 patients (55%) without BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations achieved pCR in the carboplatin arm vs 44 of the 121 patients (36.4%) in the noncarboplatin arm (OR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.28-3.58; P = .004). Patients without pathogenic BRCA1 and BRCA2 alterations showed elevated disease-free survival rates when carboplatin was added (without carboplatin, 73.5%; 95% CI, 64.1%-80.8% vs with carboplatin, 85.3%; 95% CI, 77.0%-90.8%; hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.29-0.96; P = .04).

Conclusions and relevance: Under the nonstandard GeparSixto polychemotherapy regimen, patients without BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations benefited from the addition of carboplatin and those with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations showed superior response rates without additive effects observed for carboplatin.

Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01426880.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Drs Loibl and von Minckwitz report that their institution has received research funding from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Hexal, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Teva. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. CONSORT Flow Diagram
All patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) were scheduled to receive paclitaxel, 80 mg/m2, and non–pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, 20 mg/m2, both given once a week for 18 weeks, as well as bevacizumab, 15 mg/kg, intravenously every 3 weeks simultaneously with all cycles. Patients who were randomly assigned to receive simultaneous carboplatin received the drug at a dose of 2.0 area under curve (AUC), once every week for 18 weeks. The carboplatin dose was reduced to 1.5 AUC after an interim safety analysis when approximately half of the patients were randomized.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Kaplan-Meier Analysis of Disease-Free Survival
A, Disease-free survival by treatment arm. B, Disease-free survival by BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation status and treatment arm. mt Indicates mutant; PM, paclitaxel and myocet; PMCb, paclitaxel, myocet, and carboplatin; and wt, wild-type.

Comment in

References

    1. von Minckwitz G, Schneeweiss A, Loibl S, et al. . Neoadjuvant carboplatin in patients with triple-negative and HER2-positive early breast cancer (GeparSixto; GBG 66): a randomised phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(7):747-756. - PubMed
    1. Sikov WM, Berry DA, Perou CM, et al. . Impact of the addition of carboplatin and/or bevacizumab to neoadjuvant once-per-week paclitaxel followed by dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide on pathologic complete response rates in stage II to III triple-negative breast cancer: CALGB 40603 (Alliance). J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(1):13-21. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sikov WM, Berry DA, Perou CM, et al. . Event-free and overall survival following neoadjuvant weekly paclitaxel and dose-dense AC +/− carboplatin and/or bevacizumab in triple-negative breast cancer: outcomes from CALGB 40603 (Alliance) [abstract S2-05]. Cancer Res. 2016;76(4)(suppl):S2-S5.
    1. Foulkes WD, Smith IE, Reis-Filho JS. Triple-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(20):1938-1948. - PubMed
    1. Stevens KN, Vachon CM, Couch FJ. Genetic susceptibility to triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2013;73(7):2025-2030. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data