Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2017 Jul 17;7(7):e014580.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014580.

Online versus face-to-face pulmonary rehabilitation for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: randomised controlled trial

Simon Bourne  1   2 , Ruth DeVos  1   2 , Malcolm North  2 , Anoop Chauhan  1 , Ben Green  1 , Thomas Brown  1 , Victoria Cornelius  3 , Tom Wilkinson  2   4
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Online versus face-to-face pulmonary rehabilitation for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: randomised controlled trial

Simon Bourne et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: To obtain evidence whether the online pulmonary rehabilitation(PR) programme 'my-PR' is non-inferior to a conventional face-to-face PR in improving physical performance and symptom scores in patients with COPD.

Design: A two-arm parallel single-blind, randomised controlled trial.

Setting: The online arm carried out pulmonary rehabilitation in their own homes and the face to face arm in a local rehabilitation facility.

Participants: 90 patients with a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), modified Medical Research Council score of 2 or greater referred for pulmonary rehabilitation (PR), randomised in a 2:1 ratio to online (n=64) or face-to-face PR (n=26). Participants unable to use an internet-enabled device at home were excluded.

Main outcome measures: Coprimary outcomes were 6 min walk distance test and the COPD assessment test (CAT) score at completion of the programme.

Interventions: A 6-week PR programme organised either as group sessions in a local rehabilitation facility, or online PR via log in and access to 'myPR'.

Results: The adjusted mean difference for the 6 min walk test (6MWT) between groups for the intention-to-treat (ITT) population was 23.8 m with the lower 95% CI well above the non-inferiority threshold of -40.5 m at -4.5 m with an upper 95% CI of +52.2 m. This result was consistent in the per-protocol (PP) population with a mean adjusted difference of 15 m (-13.7 to 43.8). The CAT score difference in the ITT was -1.0 in favour of the online intervention with the upper 95% CI well below the non-inferiority threshold of 1.8 at 0.86 and the lower 95% CI of -2.9. The PP analysis was consistent with the ITT.

Conclusion: PR is an evidenced-based and guideline-mandated intervention for patients with COPD with functional limitation. A 6-week programme of online-supported PR was non-inferior to a conventional model delivered in face-to-face sessions in terms of effects on 6MWT distance, and symptom scores and was safe and well tolerated.

Keywords: copd; exercise; mhealth.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: Dr Bourne reports grants and personal fees from myMHealth (a medical software company) during the conduct of the study; other from myMHealth, outside the submitted work. He is CEO, co-founder and part owner of this company. Mrs De Vos reports personal fees from myMHealth, during the conduct of the study; and is a partner in the rehabilitation facility that hosted some of the clinical trial activity. Dr Green reports grants to Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust from myMHealth, during the conduct of the study. Mr North has nothing to disclose. Dr Cornelius reports personal fees from myMHealth, during the conduct of the study. Professor Chauhan has nothing to disclose. Dr Brown reports grants from myMHealth, during the conduct of the study. Professor Wilkinson reports grants and personal fees from myMHealth during the conduct of the study. He is co-founder and part owner of this company.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CONSORT diagram patient flow in study. COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; ITT, intention to treat; PR, pulmonary rehabilitation.
Figure 2A
Figure 2A
Adjusted mean difference and 95% CI for 6 min walk test (6MWT) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) population.
Figure 2B
Figure 2B
Adjusted mean difference and 95% CI for COPD assessment test (CAT) score in the intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) population.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease;. 2013. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/conditions-and-diseases/respiratory-con....
    1. Society BT. British thoracic society quality standards for pulmonary rehabilitation in adults, 2014. 6 https://www.brit-thoracic.org.uk/document-library/clinical-information/p....
    1. McCarthy B, Casey D, Devane D, et al. . Pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015:CD003793.10.1002/14651858.CD003793.pub3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Garcia-Aymerich J, Lange P, Benet M, et al. . Regular physical activity reduces hospital admission and mortality in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a population based cohort study. Thorax 2006;61:772–8.10.1136/thx.2006.060145 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fischer MJ, Scharloo M, Abbink JJ, et al. . Drop-out and attendance in pulmonary rehabilitation: the role of clinical and psychosocial variables. Respir Med 2009;103:1564–71.10.1016/j.rmed.2008.11.020 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types