Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2017 Jul;7(3):e151-e157.
doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1603956. Epub 2017 Jul 14.

Closed-Incision Negative-Pressure Therapy in Obese Patients Undergoing Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Affiliations
Case Reports

Closed-Incision Negative-Pressure Therapy in Obese Patients Undergoing Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Ravindu P Gunatilake et al. AJP Rep. 2017 Jul.

Abstract

Background Postcesarean wound morbidity is a costly complication of cesarean delivery for which preventative strategies remain understudied. Objective We compared surgical site occurrences (SSOs) in cesarean patients receiving closed-incision negative-pressure therapy (ciNPT) or standard-of-care (SOC) dressing. Study Design A single-center randomized controlled trial compared ciNPT (5-7 days) to SOC dressing (1-2 days) in obese women (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 35), undergoing cesarean delivery between 2012 and 2014. Participants were randomized 1:1 and monitored 42 ± 10 days postoperatively. The primary outcome SSOs included unanticipated local inflammation, wound infection, seroma, hematoma, dehiscence, and need for surgical or antibiotic intervention. Results Of the 92 randomized patients, 82 completed the study. ciNPT and SOC groups had similar baseline characteristics. Mean BMI was 46.5 ± 6.5 and no treatment-related serious adverse events. Compared with SOC, the ciNPT group had fewer SSOs (7/43 [16.3%] vs. 2/39 [5.1%], respectively; p = 0.16); significantly fewer participants with less incisional pain both at rest (39/46 [84.8%] vs. 20/46 [43.5%]; p < 0.001) and with incisional pressure (42/46 [91.3%] vs. 25/46 [54.3%]; p < 0.001); and a 30% decrease in total opioid use (79.1 vs. 55.9 mg morphine equivalents, p = 0.036). Conclusion A trend in SSO reduction and a statistically significant reduction in postoperative pain and narcotic use was observed in women using ciNPT.

Keywords: cesarean; negative pressure wound therapy; obesity; wound infection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure To the author's knowledge, no conflict of interest, either financial or other, exists.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
CONSORT study population diagram.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Wound complication rates. The percentage of participants in the ciNPT and SOC groups who had any SSO and those who developed a SSI calculated from the per-protocol population ( n  = 82). SSO, surgical site occurrence; SSI, surgical site infection; ciNPT, closed-incision negative-pressure therapy; SOC, standard-of-care dressing.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Participant-perceived pain scores at rest. Percentage of participants who reported pain at rest with a value of > 2 (any pain) using the Wong–Baker Faces Scale, calculated from the intention-to-treat population ( n  = 92). ciNPT, closed-incision negative-pressure therapy; SOC, standard-of-care dressing.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Participant-perceived pain scores with pressure. Percentage of participants who reported pain with pressure applied to a value of > 2 (any pain) using the Wong–Baker Faces Scale, calculated from the intention-to-treat population ( n  = 92). ciNPT, closed-incision negative-pressure therapy; SOC, standard-of-care dressing.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Total analgesic use for hospital stay. Cumulative total inpatient use of acetaminophen, NSAID, and narcotic opioid medications expressed as milligrams, maximum daily use equivalents, and parenteral morphine mg equivalents, respectively. ciNPT, closed-incision negative-pressure therapy; NSAID, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory; SOC, standard-of-care dressing.

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Births—Method of deliveryAvailable at:http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/delivery.htm. Accessed October 07, 2015
    1. Edwards J R, Peterson K D, Mu Y et al. National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) report: data summary for 2006 through 2008, issued December 2009. Am J Infect Control. 2009;37(10):783–805. - PubMed
    1. Perlow J H, Morgan M A, Montgomery D, Towers C V, Porto M.Perinatal outcome in pregnancy complicated by massive obesity Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992167(4 Pt 1):958–962. - PubMed
    1. Alanis M C, Villers M S, Law T L, Steadman E M, Robinson C J. Complications of cesarean delivery in the massively obese parturient. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(03):2710–2.71E9. - PubMed
    1. Olsen M A, Butler A M, Willers D M, Devkota P, Gross G A, Fraser V J.Risk factors for surgical site infection after low transverse cesarean section Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 20082906477–484., discussion 485–486 - PubMed

Publication types