Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jan;18(1):163-179.
doi: 10.1111/ajt.14433. Epub 2017 Sep 14.

Pancreatic allograft thrombosis: Suggestion for a CT grading system and management algorithm

Affiliations

Pancreatic allograft thrombosis: Suggestion for a CT grading system and management algorithm

A Hakeem et al. Am J Transplant. 2018 Jan.

Abstract

Pancreatic allograft thrombosis (PAT) remains the leading cause of nonimmunologic graft failure. Here, we propose a new computed tomography (CT) grading system of PAT to identify risk factors for allograft loss and outline a management algorithm by retrospective review of consecutive pancreatic transplantations between 2009 and 2014. Triple-phase CT scans were graded independently by 2 radiologists as grade 0, no thrombosis; grade 1, peripheral thrombosis; grade 2, intermediate non-occlusive thrombosis; and grade 3, central occlusive thrombosis. Twenty-four (23.3%) of 103 recipients were diagnosed with PAT (including grade 1). Three (2.9%) grafts were lost due to portal vein thrombosis. On multivariate analysis, pancreas after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation/solitary pancreatic transplantation, acute rejection, and CT findings of peripancreatic edema and/or inflammatory change were significant risk factors for PAT. Retrospective review of CT scans revealed more grade 1 and 2 thromboses than were initially reported. There was no significant difference in graft or patient survival, postoperative stay, or morbidity of recipients with grade 1 or 2 thrombosis who were or were not anticoagulated. Our data suggest that therapeutic anticoagulation is not necessary for grade 1 and 2 arterial and grade 1 venous thrombosis. The proposed grading system can assist clinicians in decision-making and provide standardized reporting for future studies.

Keywords: clinical research/practice; coagulation and hemostasis; complication; graft survival; health services and outcomes research; pancreas/simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation; thrombosis and thromboembolism.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Representative cross‐sectional images demonstrating grades 1‐3 of venous and arterial pancreas allograft thrombosis. IMAGE 1: Grade 1 venous thrombus: axial image of a portal phase study demonstrating non‐occlusive thrombus (arrow) within an SMV tributary within fat, at the transected margin of the graft. IMAGE 2: Grade 2 venous thrombus: coronal reformatted image of a portal phase study demonstrating non‐occlusive thrombus extending along the splenic vein within the body of graft pancreas (arrow). Adjacent patent splenic artery (short arrow). IMAGE 3: Grade 3 venous thrombus: unenhanced axial image demonstrating acute hyper‐dense thrombus in an expanded SMV. IMAGE 4: Grade 3 venous thrombus: portal phase axial image demonstrating thrombus in the SMV extending into the IVC (arrow). This component is seen as hypo‐dense within otherwise opacified cava. IMAGE 5: Grade 1 arterial thrombus: axial arterial phase image demonstrating minimal thrombus in the distal splenic artery (arrow). IMAGE 6: Grade 2 arterial thrombus: axial arterial phase image demonstrating thrombus extending into the mid SMA. IMAGE 7: Grade 3 arterial thrombus: (image not from current series; obtained from a library) arterial phase coronal reformatted image demonstrating acute occlusive thrombus expanding the Y graft and SMA (arrow). Enhancement of the residual patent proximal Y graft stump (short arrow)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Death‐censored graft survival. Graft survival was significantly inferior in the thrombosis group compared to controls. All graft losses in this group occurred within two weeks of transplantation
Figure 3
Figure 3
Patient survival. There was no difference in patient survival between thrombosis and no‐thrombosis groups
Figure 4
Figure 4
Flowchart depicting the 2 distinct stages of the retrospective study
Figure 5
Figure 5
Death‐censored graft survival. Graft survival was similar between thrombosis‐Anticoagulated (Grade 1 and 2) and Thrombosis‐Not anticoagulated groups
Figure 6
Figure 6
Patient survival. There was no statistical difference in patient survival between thrombosis‐Anticoagulated (Grade 1 and 2) and Thrombosis‐Not anticoagulated groups
Figure 7
Figure 7
Management algorithm for allograft thrombosis based on the Cambridge Pancreas Allograft Thrombosis (CPAT) grading system

References

    1. Farney AC, Rogers J, Stratta RJ. Pancreas graft thrombosis: causes, prevention, diagnosis, and intervention. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2012;17(1):87‐92. - PubMed
    1. Ramessur Chandran S, Kanellis J, Polkinghorne KR, Saunder AC, Mulley WR. Early pancreas allograft thrombosis. Clin Transplant. 2013;27(3):410‐416. - PubMed
    1. Muthusamy AS, Giangrande PL, Friend PJ. Pancreas allograft thrombosis. Transplantation. 2010;90(7):705‐707. - PubMed
    1. Burke GW 3rd, Ciancio G, Figueiro J, et al. Hypercoagulable state associated with kidney‐pancreas transplantation. Thromboelastogram‐directed anti‐coagulation and implications for future therapy. Clin Transplant. 2004;18(4):423‐428. - PubMed
    1. Shahrestani S, Webster AC, Lam VW, et al. Outcomes from pancreatic transplantation in donation after cardiac death: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Transplantation. 2017;101(1):122‐130. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms