Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Nov;70(5):638-655.
doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2017.05.018. Epub 2017 Jul 15.

Treatment of Uremic Pruritus: A Systematic Review

Affiliations
Free article

Treatment of Uremic Pruritus: A Systematic Review

Elizabeth Simonsen et al. Am J Kidney Dis. 2017 Nov.
Free article

Abstract

Background: Uremic pruritus is a common and burdensome symptom afflicting patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) and has been declared a priority for CKD research by patients. The optimal treatments for uremic pruritus are not well defined.

Study design: Systematic review.

Setting & population: Adult patients with advanced CKD (stage ≥ 3) or receiving any form of dialysis.

Selection criteria for studies: PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov from their inception to March 6, 2017, were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of uremic pruritus treatments in patients with advanced CKD (stage ≥ 3) or receiving any form of dialysis. 2 reviewers extracted data independently. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration risk-of-bias tool.

Intervention: Any intervention for the treatment of uremic pruritus was included.

Outcomes: A quantitative change in pruritus intensity on a visual analogue, verbal rating, or numerical rating scale.

Results: 44 RCTs examining 39 different treatments were included in the review. These treatments included gabapentin, pregabalin, mast cell stabilizers, phototherapy, hemodialysis modifications, and multiple other systemic and topical treatments. The largest body of evidence was found for the effectiveness of gabapentin. Due to the limited number of trials for the other treatments included, we are unable to comment on their efficacy. Risk of bias in most studies was high.

Limitations: Heterogeneity in design, treatments, and outcome measures rendered comparisons difficult and precluded meta-analysis.

Conclusions: Despite the acknowledged importance of uremic pruritus to patients, with the exception of gabapentin, the current evidence for treatments is weak. Large, simple, rigorous, multiarm RCTs of promising therapies are urgently needed.

Keywords: Uremic pruritus; chronic kidney disease (CKD); dialysis; end-stage renal disease (ESRD); gabapentin; randomized control trials (RCTs); systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources