Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Dec;33(6):1328-1332.
doi: 10.1007/s13187-017-1254-z.

Is Cancer Information Exchanged on Social Media Scientifically Accurate?

Affiliations

Is Cancer Information Exchanged on Social Media Scientifically Accurate?

Elizabeth A Gage-Bouchard et al. J Cancer Educ. 2018 Dec.

Abstract

Cancer patients and their caregivers are increasingly using social media as a platform to share cancer experiences, connect with support, and exchange cancer-related information. Yet, little is known about the nature and scientific accuracy of cancer-related information exchanged on social media. We conducted a content analysis of 12 months of data from 18 publically available Facebook Pages hosted by parents of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (N = 15,852 posts) and extracted all exchanges of medically-oriented cancer information. We systematically coded for themes in the nature of cancer-related information exchanged on personal Facebook Pages and two oncology experts independently evaluated the scientific accuracy of each post. Of the 15,852 total posts, 171 posts contained medically-oriented cancer information. The most frequent type of cancer information exchanged was information related to treatment protocols and health services use (35%) followed by information related to side effects and late effects (26%), medication (16%), medical caregiving strategies (13%), alternative and complementary therapies (8%), and other (2%). Overall, 67% of all cancer information exchanged was deemed medically/scientifically accurate, 19% was not medically/scientifically accurate, and 14% described unproven treatment modalities. These findings highlight the potential utility of social media as a cancer-related resource, but also indicate that providers should focus on recommending reliable, evidence-based sources to patients and caregivers.

Keywords: Caregiver; Health communication; Information seeking; Pediatrics; Psycho-social oncology; Social media; United States.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose

References

    1. Chou WY, Hunt Y, Beckjord EB, Moser RP, Hesse BW. Social media use in the United States: Implications for health communication. J Med Internet Res. 2009;11(4):e48. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hamm MP, Chisholm A, Shulhun J, Milne A, Scott SD, Given LM, Hartling L. Social media use among patients and caregivers: A scoping review. BMJ Open. 2013;3(5):e002819. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moorhead SA, Haslett DE, Harrison L, Carroll JK, Irwin A, Hoving C. A new dimension of health care: Systematic review of the uses, benefits, and limitations of social media for health communication. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(4):e85. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chou WY, Prestin A, Lyons C, Wen K. Web 2.0 for health promotion: Reviewing the current evidence. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(1):e9–e18. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Weaver B, Lindsay B, Gitelman B. Communication technology and social media: opportunities and implications for health care systems. Online J Issues Nurs. 2012;17(3):3. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources