Corrupting the DNA damage response: a critical role for Rad52 in tumor cell survival
- PMID: 28722656
- PMCID: PMC5559167
- DOI: 10.18632/aging.101263
Corrupting the DNA damage response: a critical role for Rad52 in tumor cell survival
Abstract
The DNA damage response enables cells to survive, maintain genome integrity, and to safeguard the transmission of high-fidelity genetic information. Upon sensing DNA damage, cells respond by activating this multi-faceted DNA damage response leading to restoration of the cell, senescence, programmed cell death, or genomic instability if the cell survives without proper repair. However, unlike normal cells, cancer cells maintain a marked level of genomic instability. Because of this enhanced propensity to accumulate DNA damage, tumor cells rely on homologous recombination repair as a means of protection from the lethal effect of both spontaneous and therapy-induced double-strand breaks (DSBs) in DNA. Thus, modulation of DNA repair pathways have important consequences for genomic instability within tumor cell biology and viability maintenance under high genotoxic stress. Efforts are underway to manipulate specific components of the DNA damage response in order to selectively induce tumor cell death by augmenting genomic instability past a viable threshold. New evidence suggests that RAD52, a component of the homologous recombination pathway, is important for the maintenance of tumor genome integrity. This review highlights recent reports indicating that reducing homologous recombination through inhibition of RAD52 may represent an important focus for cancer therapy and the specific efforts that are already demonstrating potential.
Keywords: DNA damage response; Rad52; pre‐clinical model; squamous cell carcinoma of the lung; tumor growth.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Figures
References
-
- Khanna KK, Jackson SP. DNA double-strand breaks: signaling, repair and the cancer connection. Nat Genet. 2001;27:247–54. https://doi.org/10.1038/85798 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Boesch P, Weber-Lotfi F, Ibrahim N, Tarasenko V, Cosset A, Paulus F, Lightowlers RN, Dietrich A. DNA repair in organelles: Pathways, organization, regulation, relevance in disease and aging. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2011;1813:186–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2010.10.002 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Harper JW, Elledge SJ. The DNA damage response: ten years after. Mol Cell. 2007;28:739–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2007.11.015 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Lindahl T, Barnes DE. Repair of endogenous DNA damage. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2000;65:127–34. https://doi.org/10.1101/sqb.2000.65.127 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Shiloh Y. ATM and related protein kinases: safeguarding genome integrity. Nat Rev Cancer. 2003;3:155–68. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc1011 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials