Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Dec;61(6):534-541.
doi: 10.1590/2359-3997000000278. Epub 2017 Jul 13.

Effects of a structured education program on glycemic control in type 1 diabetes

Affiliations

Effects of a structured education program on glycemic control in type 1 diabetes

Ana Paula F Pacheco et al. Arch Endocrinol Metab. 2017 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: Diabetes mellitus is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, and education is known to play a key role in managing this disease. This study addresses the effects of a structured education program (SEP) on self-care in subjects with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). The aim was to evaluate the effect of a SEP on glycemic control, knowledge, and skills associated with diabetes care in subjects with T1DM.

Subjects and methods: A total of 47 adults with T1DM were followed up for 20 months (32 participated in the SEP and 15 served as a control group). The SEP consisted of workshops, individualized care, 24-hour distant support, and a questionnaire assessing knowledge of diabetes care. Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels were measured before and after the SEP implementation.

Results: Compared with pre-SEP levels, the mean HbA1c levels decreased by approximately 20% (21 mmol/mol) at 1 year, with a further 11% reduction (10 mmol/mol) observed 8 months later (p < 0.001). Knowledge about diabetes care increased by 37% between the pre-SEP and post-SEP questionnaires (p < 0.005).

Conclusion: Relevant improvements occurred after SEP activities. The sustained decrease in HbA1c levels and the overall increase in knowledge and confidence regarding diabetes care reinforce the importance, necessity, and positive outcomes of a SEP intervention in T1DM.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure: no potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Comparison of the total hits on the questionnaire about diabetes care knowledge, in the pre-SEP and post-SEP evaluations.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) values of 47 subjects (32 in the SEP group and 15 in the control group) at three time points (pre-SEP, post-SEP, and follow-up).
Figure 3
Figure 3. Patients’ feedback about the program: results of a semistructured interview with subjects from the SEP group (A) and the control group (B).

References

    1. World Health Organization. The world health report 2002: reducing risks, promoting healthy life. World Health Organization, 2002.
    1. IDF. IDF Diabetes Atlas Seventh Edition. (2015). Available from: <http://www.idf.org/idf-diabetes-atlas-seventh-edition>. Access on: Feb. 16, 2016.
    1. Wu YL, Ding YP, Gao J, Tanaka Y, Zhang W. Risk factors and primary prevention trials for type 1 diabetes. Int J Biol Sci. 2013;9(7):666-79. - PMC - PubMed
    1. National Audit Office. The management of adult diabetes services in the NHS. (2012). Available from: <https://www.nao.org.uk/report/the-management-of-adult-diabetes-services-...>. Access on: Feb. 16, 2016.
    1. Beeney LJ, Bakry AA, Dunn SM. Patient psychological and information needs when the diagnosis is diabetes. Patient Educ Couns. 1996;29(1):109-16. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources