Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2017 Jul 19;17(1):154.
doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0548-7.

Impact of a lay-led home-based intervention programme on quality of life in community-dwelling pre-frail and frail older adults: a randomized controlled trial

A Kapan  1 , E Winzer  2 , S Haider  2 , S Titze  3 , K Schindler  4 , C Lackinger  5 , T E Dorner  2
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Impact of a lay-led home-based intervention programme on quality of life in community-dwelling pre-frail and frail older adults: a randomized controlled trial

A Kapan et al. BMC Geriatr. .

Abstract

Background: Due to the demographic ageing process and the increasing number of pre-frail and frail individuals, new lifestyle interventions to enhance the quality of life (QoL) in community-dwelling older adults are necessary. Therefore, we performed a randomised controlled trial (RCT) to compare effects of a lay-led home-based physical and nutritional intervention programme with social support alone on different QoL domains in community-dwelling pre-frail and frail older adults.

Methods: In this analysis within a RCT (12 weeks), lay volunteers visited one-on-one pre-frail or frail older adults at home twice a week. Participants in the physical training and nutritional intervention (PTN) group performed six strength exercises and discussed main nutritional issues during each visit. The social support (SOSU) group received home visits twice a week for social exchanges. The QoL was assessed with the WHOQOL-BREF and the WHOQOL-OLD instruments. Analyses of covariance (ANCOVA) were used to examine differences between groups with baseline values as the covariate. Changes within groups were assessed with paired t-tests.

Results: Eighty participants (n = 39 in the PTN group and n = 41 in the SOSU group) were included. No significant differences were found between the two groups except in past, present and future activities domain [β = 3.66 (95% confidence interval 0.13 to 7.18)] in favour of the PTN group. However, there was some evidence of greater within group improvements in the PTN group particularly in overall QoL, social relations and social participation. In the SOSU group, no significant effect was observed in any QoL domain.

Conclusion: A combination of a home-based physical and nutritional intervention was not more effective compared to social support alone, on QoL in community-dwelling pre-frail and frail older adults. However, the small but significant improvement within the PTN group suggests that a home-based physical and nutritional intervention delivered by volunteers may influence the QoL in a positive way.

Trial registration: The study protocol was registered on 6 November 2013 at ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT01991639 ).

Keywords: Frailty; Home-based programme; Quality of life; Volunteer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the local ethics committee of the Medical University of Vienna (EK no. 627/2011). All study participants received oral and written information about the aim of the study and about the procedure. They all gave both written and oral consent to participate.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow of participants through the trial
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Chen X, Mao G, Leng SX. Frailty syndrome: an overview. Clin Interv Aging. 2014;9:433–441. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chang Y-W, Chen W-L, Lin F-G, Fang W-H, Yen M-Y, Hsieh C-C, Kao T-W. Frailty and its impact on health-related quality of life: a cross-sectional study on elder community-dwelling preventive health service users. PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e38079. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038079. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Masel MC, Ostir GV, Ottenbacher KJ. Frailty, mortality, and health-related quality of life in older Mexican Americans. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010;58(11):2149–2153. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03146.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fillit H, Butler RN. The frailty identity crisis. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009;57(2):348–352. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.02104.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kojima G, Iliffe S, Jivraj S, Walters K. Association between frailty and quality of life among community-dwelling older people: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016;70(7):716–721. doi: 10.1136/jech-2015-206717. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources