Measures and predictors of varenicline adherence in the treatment of nicotine dependence
- PMID: 28728040
- PMCID: PMC5581992
- DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.07.006
Measures and predictors of varenicline adherence in the treatment of nicotine dependence
Abstract
Introduction: While adherence to medication in smoking cessation clinical trials is strongly associated with clinical outcome, very few studies have evaluated the validity of pill count as a measure of adherence relative to a biological assay, and evaluated a broad range of correlates of adherence.
Methods: In a smoking cessation clinical trial of varenicline, we compared pill counts collected over 4 different time periods to varenicline salivary levels taken after 2weeks of treatment, as well as evaluated predictors of adherence to varenicline.
Results: Using a binary measure of adherence based on salivary varenicline levels, adherence was higher among older, white, and more educated participants. Relative to 3, 7, and 14-day pill count, 12-week pill count was the only significant measure able to discriminate adherence as defined by salivary varenicline levels (assessed by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; AUC=0.59, p=0.004). Seventy-two percent of participants who indicated adherence on 12-week pill count were classified as adherent based on varenicline saliva levels (sensitivity=0.80; specificity=0.40). There was modest variability in the relationship between 12-week pill count and varenicline levels across race and rate of nicotine metabolism. Lastly, General Estimating Equation models demonstrated that longitudinal changes in withdrawal, craving, negative and positive affect, and side effect count and severity were not related to adherence based on salivary varenicline levels.
Conclusions: These results indicate that 12-week pill count was the best, albeit a relatively weak, measure of varenicline adherence; additional factors associated with treatment adherence need to be identified.
Keywords: Adherence; Nicotine dependence; Smoking cessation; Varenicline.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Dr. Schnoll receives medication and placebo free of charge from Pfizer for other clinical trials and has provided consultation to Pfizer and GlaxoSmithKline. Dr. Tyndale has consulted for Apotex. Drs. George and Cinciripini have had investigator and industry sponsored research funding from Pfizer, and Dr. George is a consultant to Novartis. These companies had no involvement in this study.
Figures
References
-
- Brown RBE, Sales S, Whiteley J, Evans D, Miller I. Reliability and Validity of a Smoking Timeline Follow-Back Interview. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors. 1998;12(2):101–112.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
